Identify a specific employer and union by name; describe the effect of unionization on wages, hours, and working conditions for those specific workers and that employer.
Sample Solution
Since the unionization of UAW-represented employees at Ford Motor Company, wages, hours and working conditions have improved significantly for those workers. The collective bargaining agreement between the two parties has resulted in higher base wage rates, along with a number of other benefits such as health care coverage, improved safety standards on the job, paid holidays and vacation time, tuition assistance for dependents, cost-of-living adjustments to keep up with inflation and more. Furthermore, through collective bargaining agreements negotiated by UAW representatives on behalf of their members at Ford Motor Company,
Sample Solution
Since the unionization of UAW-represented employees at Ford Motor Company, wages, hours and working conditions have improved significantly for those workers. The collective bargaining agreement between the two parties has resulted in higher base wage rates, along with a number of other benefits such as health care coverage, improved safety standards on the job, paid holidays and vacation time, tuition assistance for dependents, cost-of-living adjustments to keep up with inflation and more. Furthermore, through collective bargaining agreements negotiated by UAW representatives on behalf of their members at Ford Motor Company,
On the other side of the aisle, there are a handful of disadvantages associated with the relationship of open-list PR. In traditional PR, party leaders would have the power to allocate seats to their parties candidates as they deem appropriate, taking away political influence from citizens. Candidates in both systems have incentives to garner political party support as it allocates more party power within the upper and lower chambers of the legislature. However, since candidates have more personal power in making a name for themselves without necessarily following party principles, this can lead to a weakening of political parties. Lack of faith in political parties leads to what is known as floor crossing, political figures would change party affiliation, “in an attempt to jockey for the best positions for future elections,” (Dickovick/Eastwood, 409). Only causing faith in open-list PR to further disintegrate, political leaders would offer bribes to legislators to maintain a majority vote on specific pieces of legislation. Also, due to legislators loyalty to their federal states, they do not always have Brazil’s interests in mind when enacting legislation, as only the members of their respective state ensure re-election. What’s more, Brazil contains a multi-party, fragmented party, system where “voters may face as many as one thousand candidates in a single district… [caused by] high-magnitude legislative districts, low costs for candidates’ entry, and high thresholds for the number of candidates per party list,” (Aguilar/Barone/Cunow/Desposato, 181). Withal, the disadvantages of open-list PR in Brazil have led citizens to lose trust in their government, such as the impeachment of Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff in August 2016.
Altogether, the interesting question arises of how an open-list PR system would affect a less fragmented, strong party alliance system in a democracy such as the United States. The transition from a strict first-past-the-post system, which has been the building blocks for American society for 250 years, would certainly cause an uproar from conservatives and libertarians alike. While it would have little to no effect on the Senate retaining two seats per state, the institution of voting proportionment would likely result in smaller parties becoming more prevalent in the House of Representatives. Potential effects of such an institutional
