Write an essay of 500-700 words responding to the following questions in an essay format. Respond to the questions in one complete essay, not in a short essay format where you respond to each question in separate short essays.
What is meant by the term “junk science” and is it always readily identifiable?
What is the Daubert rule?
Who is responsible for implementing the Daubert rule at trial and what have been the challenges in implementing the rule with respect to expert forensic testimony?
What steps should be taken to ensure that “junk science” is not admitted as real scientific evidence in criminal trials?
