{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

analize the film 12 Angry Men and its characters from a communications perspective.You must watch the film in its entirety, take notes and answer the specific questions posted in the Week 5 Discussion Board forum. You may want to have the questions with you as you watch the movie.Go to Just Watch It to rent the movie for $3.99 in most streaming services. You can choose which service you prefer.Pay close attention to the plot and the characters in the 1957 film. While the group communications methods are in person and may seem old-fashioned, the exchanges are valuable as guides of what is effective and what is not in a group environment. The setting in the film may not be viewed by all as a professional setting, but it is. The men who gather are strangers to each other. They must (or should) be professional using all tips noted in the Week 4 lecture, they must (or should) show respect, and they must work toward one, unified goal. Enjoy the film. NOTE:Although 12 Angry Men is still considered a standard for depicting what happens inside a jury room, it is not without its problems. For instance, you will notice the jury is made up of all men. The play on which this film is based was written in the days before women were allowed to serve on juries in most jurisdictoins.
BackgroundIn England before the 15th century, juries were chosen among people who actually knew something about the customs of the people and the locale in question. The modern jury dates from the 15th century when English Common Law judges began to instruct juries on the law and restrict them to finding the facts from the evidence presented at the trial. Under the U.S. Constitution, a person is entitled to a jury of his peers.

Sample Solution

The jury room includes twelve men with very different personalities and backgrounds. The main characters in 12 Angry Men are Juror #1 (Henry Fonda) who takes on the role of leader, Juror #3 (Lee J. Cobb) who is stubborn, fierce and angry, Juror #7 (Jack Warden) who is an impatient businessman, Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) who argues for reasonable doubt, and Jury Foreman (Martin Balsam) who acts as a mediator between jurors. Other jurors include Juror 2 (John Fielder), 4 (E G Marshall), 5(Jack Klugman), 6(Edward Binns), 9(Joseph Sweeney), 10(Ed Begley Sr.), 11(George Voskovec), 12(Robert Webber).

2. What communication techniques were used by each character?

Juror 1 uses active listening to allow all jurors to express their opinion before he shares his perspective. He seeks common ground amongst them by presenting factual evidence and asking questions that encourage others to think through their reasoning. He also speaks calmly and avoids personal attacks when engaging in debates with other members of the jury room.

 

 

Sample Solution

The jury room includes twelve men with very different personalities and backgrounds. The main characters in 12 Angry Men are Juror #1 (Henry Fonda) who takes on the role of leader, Juror #3 (Lee J. Cobb) who is stubborn, fierce and angry, Juror #7 (Jack Warden) who is an impatient businessman, Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) who argues for reasonable doubt, and Jury Foreman (Martin Balsam) who acts as a mediator between jurors. Other jurors include Juror 2 (John Fielder), 4 (E G Marshall), 5(Jack Klugman), 6(Edward Binns), 9(Joseph Sweeney), 10(Ed Begley Sr.), 11(George Voskovec), 12(Robert Webber).

2. What communication techniques were used by each character?

Juror 1 uses active listening to allow all jurors to express their opinion before he shares his perspective. He seeks common ground amongst them by presenting factual evidence and asking questions that encourage others to think through their reasoning. He also speaks calmly and avoids personal attacks when engaging in debates with other members of the jury room.

 

 

citizens to actively seat candidates they believe will benefit their regional constituency. Furthermore, PR systems give political access to minority parties even if they do not receive a majority of the vote, meaning that to some extent everyone is being represented. Additionally, these weaker political parties can form coalitions with larger, more prominent parties to form coalitions that sway chamber voting. Coalitions aid smaller, weaker parties to combat social dominance theory as “the dominators in order to continue domination, and the disadvantaged group to try to change the status quo,” (Aguilar/Barone/Cunow/Desposato, 180). In this way, power sharing between parties, and even interest groups become more apparent to citizens so they know who is responsible for the policies being enacted, which influences the next election cycle. Overall, open-list PR produces a number of advantages permitting a level of transparency between the governing bodies and the populace at large.

On the other side of the aisle, there are a handful of disadvantages associated with the relationship of open-list PR. In traditional PR, party leaders would have the power to allocate seats to their parties candidates as they deem appropriate, taking away political influence from citizens. Candidates in both systems have incentives to garner political party support as it allocates more party power within the upper and lower chambers of the legislature. However, since candidates have more personal power in making a name for themselves without necessarily following party principles, this can lead to a weakening of political parties. Lack of faith in political parties leads to what is known as floor crossing, political figures would change party affiliation, “in an attempt to jockey for the best positions for future elections,” (Dickovick/Eastwood, 409). Only causing faith in open-list PR to further disintegrate, political leaders would offer bribes to legislators to maintain a majority vote on specific pieces of legislation. Also, due to legislators loyalty to their federal states, they do not always have Brazil’s interests in mind when enacting legislation, as only the members of their respective state ensure re-election. What’s more, Brazil contains a multi-party, fragmented party, system where “voters may face as many as one thousand candidates in a single district… [caused by] high-magnitude legislative districts, low costs for candidates’ entry, and high thresholds for the number of candidates per party list,” (Aguilar/Barone/Cunow/Desposato, 181). Withal, the disadvantages of open-list PR in Brazil have led citizens to lose trust in their government, such as the impeachment of Brazilian president Dilm

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?