{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
  1.  German Tragedy   





    Trace Adolph Hitler’s career from 1919 to 1939 and the ensuing “German Tragedy”.
    Describe Hitler’s early career (World War I through the 1920s), and assess possible formative influences that set the background for the beginning of the Nazi movement.
    Provide a brief synopsis of the beginning of the Weimar Republic. Why did the years of 1929-1933 bring the Weimar Republic to an end?
    Assess the significance of the economic conditions that contributed to the rise of Nazism. How then, did Hitler lift Germany out of economic depression?
    How did Hitler manipulate constitutional policy to usurp power from 1933-1939?
    Why was Hitler’s message so convincing to the German people? How could such a psychopath gain total power?



Subject History Pages 3 Style APA


Adolf Hitler’s Career from 1919 to 1939 and the ensuing German Tragedy

This paper seeks to give a description of Adolph Hitler’s early career and assess the probable determinative impacts that set the basis for the foundation of the Nazi movement. Additionally, the paper provides a short summary of the emergence of the Weimar Republic as well as why the years of 1929 to 1933 took the Weimar Republic to a termination. Thirdly, the paper assesses the importance of the economic situations that led to the emergence of Nazism as well as how Adolph elevated the German out of the economic hopelessness. Fourthly, the paper outlines how Hitler misrepresented the legitimate policy to take over power from 1933 to 1939. Finally, the paper shows why Hitler’s memo was persuasive to the Germans and how he gained power.

Adolf Hitler battled within the German armed force during World War One. Hitler was severely injured twice and won two Iron Crosses for bravery (Kershaw., 2014). Germany’s surrendering in November 1918 was a stun to him and had a significant impact on his political opinions. Like other German individuals at the time, he felt they had been ‘wounded in the back’ by politicians. Later after World War One, Hitler went to Munich and got to be the pioneer of the German Worker’s Party (DAP) (DiNardo., 2018). This was a small organization of extraordinary supporters of independence as well as anti-Semites that realized their importance as they were attempting to triumph over German laborers from the internationalist Social Democratic Party and, within the consequences of vanquish and revolt, to convince individuals that Jews were basically answerable to the Germany’s quandary (Daniel & Sterphone., 2019). In July 1921 according to DiNardo (2018), Hitler acceded the authority of the organization, and retitled it the “National Socialist German Workers’ Party” (NSDAP). About 12 years later, it turned out to be the major organization within Germany and Hitler was Reich Leader (Nicholls., 2016). Adolph was powerful in characterizing the party’s convictions. Under his authority the Nazi organization rapidly created a 25-Point Program (Van Riel & Schram., 1993), which was a list of the arrangements it would present if it came to control.

From a period 1919 to 1933, Weimar Republic was a Germany’s administration after the World War One till the emergence of Nazi Germany (Van Riel & Schram., 1993). Weimar Republic was called after the city of Weimar where Germany’s new administration was made by an assembly of the state after Kaiser Wilhelm II resigned. Though an impressive number of appointees voted against it, the new structure was inevitably endorsed and marked in August 1919. The Weimar Republic was set up as a demonstrative democracy that tried to provide veritable control to all German grown-ups (Van Riel & Schram., 1993). Nevertheless, it had major blemishes that led to its destruction in 1933-1934. The Republic had a proportional representation as one of the major flaws. In explanation, each organization gained the same number of positions in assembly as the number of votes it established in a race. This implied there were a number of minor organizations in Parliament making it troublesome to approve Acts and resulted to powerless and regularly short-lived administrations. Additionally, article 48 offered the leader the control to act minus parliament’s endorsement in a crisis (DiNardo., 2018). However, it did not clearly characterize what an ’emergency’ was, so the power was abused, which debilitated Germans’ certainty in democracy. It is with these argumentations that the Weimar Republic malformed.

The German economic crisis was pivotal to enhancing the Nazi movement’s democratic affluences (Van Riel & Schram., 1993). It intensified the German economy’s depression, driving to more fundamental election due to decreasing salaries. Furthermore, it expanded the Nazis’ ubiquity unswervingly. The bank (Danatbank) at the center of the predicament, was driven by conspicuous Jewish financier Jakob Goldschmidt. Hence, the Nazi party’s established statement that “the Jews are [Germany’s] misfortune” was, therefore, apparently borne out by undeniable reality. It is with this argumentation that these non-economic impacts of the banking predicament were significant to clarifying political radicalization. More financial failure was one imperative component that joins the banking crisis to Nazi election (DiNardo., 2018). Whereas joblessness did not influence Nazi votes, salary decreases driven by presentation to Danatbank as well as Dresdner Bank (DD) emphatically improved the support for the Nazi organization (NSDAP). When Hitler turned out to be Chancellor of Germany in 1933, he presented approaches objected at progressing the economy and made a difference in a recuperation from the depression (Nicholls., 2016). The changes included privatization of state businesses, autarky (national financial self-sufficiency), as well as duties on imports. And significant to Germany’s recuperation was government investing, most of it being on public works.

Hitler manipulated the constitutional policy through introduction of “Law to Remedy the Distress of People and the Reich” which was also known as the “Enabling Act.” Germany’s parliament approved the “Enabling Act” (Nicholls., 2016). From that point on, Adolf Hitler could enact laws without the need of legislative support. Additionally, Hitler could enter into contracts or coalitions with other nations (Nicholls., 2016). Generally, the law set aside parts of the Weimar Constitution, giving Hitler together with his cabinet the authority to govern by declaration.

While the Nazis took over, their dangerous vitality was basically coordinated against their political adversaries (Daniel & Sterphone., 2019; Lee., 2012). The German Jews shaped the exemption. As a group, they did not contradict the desire of the Nazis. Nevertheless, they were the consistent victims of viciousness, badgering, and persecution. As early as 1 April 1933, the government took official activity against the Jews. It reported a major boycott of Jewish items. It was the primary step in an arrangement of anti-Jewish measures that would end in the Holocaust. After taking control, Hitler and the Nazis turned Germany into a fascism (Lee., 2012). Time and again, they utilized legitimate techniques to deliver their actions a semblance of legitimateness. Step by step, Hitler oversaw to dissolve majority rule government until it was just an empty facade. This was accomplished through the spread of publicity whereby Hitler placed Josef Goebbels in charge of Nazi publicity (Daniel & Sterphone., 2019). The Nazis applied simple slogans to present their thoughts as well as to make them plea to the common citizens of Germany. At the same time Goebbels barred individuals that restricted Nazi policies from articulating their opinions. This assisted in ensuring only Nazi messages reached the public. The Nazi Party was amazingly organized. This meant they were capable of conveying policies to a wide range of individuals, whereas showing up to be competent and capable to run the nation.





Daniel, G. R., & Sterphone, J. (2019). Shame, Anti-Semitism, and Hitler’s Rise to Power in Germany. EC Psychology and Psychiatry8, 334-345.

DiNardo, R. L. (2018). The First Soldier: Hitler as Military Leader. Parameters48(4), 90-91.

Kershaw, I. (2014). Hitler. Routledge.

Lee, S. J. (2012). European Dictatorships 1918-1945. Routledge.

Nicholls, A. J. (2016). Weimar and the Rise of Hitler. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Van Riel, A., & Schram, A. (1993). Weimar economic decline, Nazi economic recovery, and the stabilization of political dictatorship. The journal of economic history, 53(1), 71-105.




Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?