{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
  1. QUESTION

    Humanities and social sciences   

    Assignments instructions

    You need to provide summary of the one resource taken from the assignment that is already submitted. This summery is nothing but the resource itself in detailed explanation.

    You need to design a rubric for the evaluation of such resources. Provide the whole document in the form of a report. (That is, it includes introduction part, about rubric, how to apply rubric and rubric itself etc).

     

    Note – An example of rubric is also provided for the reference.

    Word count – 1000 words

    Rubric measuring effectiveness of resources for student engagement and learning of HASS

     

    Instructions:    Tick mark in the boxes which best depicts the efficiency of the resources against each marking criteria. Alternatively, additional notes or comments can be added to specify the marks for the given criteria. Any general comments or feedback can also be provided in last columns.

     

     

     

    Marking Criteria

     

    Evaluation

    High distinction

    (8.5 – 10)

    Characteristics of the resource are clearly evident and highly effective

    Distinction

    (7.5-8.5)

    Evident and mostly effective

    Credit

    (6.5-7.5)

    Mostly evident and moderately effective

    Pass

    (5-6.5)

    Evident in some place and minimally effective

    Fail

    (0-5)

    Not evident and appropriate at all

    Additional comments/Feedback

    Appropriateness and suitability of the resource for HASS learning:

    Teaching resource is explicitly aligned with target Humanities and Social Sciences (HASS) Australian Curriculum links appropriate to Early primary years of education. The resource is highly relevant and suitable to teach the target topic, to meet and achieve the desired learning objectives for specific Year level.

    R1: Resource is correctly linked to content descriptions of History sub-strand of Knowledge and Understanding skills of HASS for the appropriate Year level.

     

    R3: Resource is accurately connected to content descriptions of geography sub-strand of Knowledge and Understanding skills and Inquiry Skills of HASS learning area.

     

    R2: No clear target learning objectives and connections to specific content descriptions/Elaborations of Geography sub-strand of Knowledge and Understanding skills of HASS for Foundation Year level. No specific information to determine appropriateness of the resource for all students.

     

     

     

    Develops cross curriculum learning and general capabilities:

    Teaching resource provides wide range of opportunities to develop literacy, numeracy and ICT skills. It identifies and develops varying general capabilities encompassing Personal and Social skills, Intercultural understanding, Critical and Creative thinking skills.

    R1: Reflects clear connections to develop literacy, ICT skill and some general capabilities. However, it can be used for numeracy learning.

     

    R3: Reflects effective ability to develop critical and creative thinking skills, ethical understandings and sustainability.

    R2: Reflects ability to integrate other curriculum areas such as Science and to establish general abilities involving literacy skills, critical and cognitive thinking.

    R3: Resource reflects the developing ability to create cross connections with literacy language and Historical skills.

     

     

    Relevancy in context with contemporary pedagogical approaches and theories for effective HASS teaching-learning:

    Teaching resource reflects the effective use of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), contemporary pedagogical approaches and established theories involving Inquiry based learning, scaffolding and constructivist approach. It demonstrates the authentic and visible teaching and learning of Humanities and social sciences in Early primary years.

    R1: Demonstrates efficient ability to integrate PCK involving contemporary pedagogical approaches to reflect authentic inquiry-based learning.

     

    R2: Demonstrates efficient ability to integrate contemporary pedagogical approaches reflecting play-based, Inquiry-based and constructivist learning. Sound ability of visible and authentic learning.

     

    R1: Additional information about what stage the resource can be used would have been useful.

     

    R2: Additional information about what stage the resource can be used would have been useful.

     

    R3: Reflects limited scope of implementing contemporary pedagogical approaches such as play-based and constructivism approach.

    No clear information as where and how to use each resource from the set and will it be used independently or part of any unit plan or lesson plan

     

     

    Supports students’ higher order thinking:

    Teaching resource provides wide range of learning opportunities to develop 4c’s of 21st century education i.e. Communication, Collaboration, Creative and Critical thinking to support students’ higher order thinking levels.

    R1: Demonstrates high efficiency to support students’ higher order thinking and the development of 4c’s of learning through class discussions, group and individual activities.

     

    R2: Reflects efficient ability to develop 4c’s of learning to support students’ higher order thinking through group activities, learning via investigation, by answering questions.

    R3: Resource demonstrates effective ability to support students’ higher order thinking.

     

     

     

     

    Supports students’ diversity and abilities:

    Teaching resource identifies and appreciates inclusive educational practices. It offers sufficient learning opportunities to support wide range of socio-cultural and linguistic diversities and meet needs of diverse learners including EAL/D and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students.

    Resource is user friendly i.e. easy to use; easily accessible to all the learners and can be modified to cater the diversities more widely.

     

    R3: Reflects effective ability to support socio-cultural diversity of learners including Aboriginal and Torres Islander students.

    R1: Reflects strong ability to accommodate linguistic and physical diversities.

    Not much information about socio-cultural diversity such as how to support Aboriginal students. Lack of ability to integrate scaffolding approach or modification of the resource to make it more user friendly.

     

    R3: Resource can be modified to integrate scaffolding approach to cater linguistic and physical diversity more widely.

    R2: Reflects minimal ability to design or modify the resource to foster inclusivity. But scaffolding approach can be used during associated learning activities to support diverse students’ learning.

     

    R3: It is set of varying resources which does not clearly specify the factors to demonstrate the suitability for all age group learners.

     

     

    Develops appealing and engaging learning experiences:

    Teaching resource actively engages, motivates and attracts the students. It demonstrates the potential to create fun, play-based, hands-on learning and engaging learning experiences. It reflects the ability to create purposeful and innovative learning activities.

    R1: Reflects sound capability to provide creative and engaging learning experiences.

     

    R2: Reflects high ability to create engaging, fun and creative learning through place-based learning experiences.

     

     

    R3: Resource is more teacher-centred and lacks fun/ play-based learning experiences which may not engage all the students.

     

     

     

    Key: Yellow colour signifies Resource 1 (R1); Green colour signifies Resource 2 (R2); Blue colour signifies Resource 3 (R3)

     

     

     

     

    Note – you don’t need to highlight the rubric according to the resource. Provide a general rubric that can be applied to any resource.

     

 

Subject Uncategorized Pages 9 Style APA

Answer

    1.  

      Evaluation Rubric

      Rubric measuring the effectiveness of photos as a resource.

      Rubrics are logical points of references of evaluation of students’ work. They contain descriptions of different distinctions according to the quality of work, and they contain description of the performance. Rubrics are different depending on what is being assessed. In some cases, they are used in assessment of a student’s finished work and in others, the process of a student doing something like using a drill is assessed (Brookhart S. M., n.d). According to Arter and McTighe (2000), rubrics helps both the student and teacher to know what is considered crucial in assessment of a given assignment.

      The use of rubrics has been embraced by educators all around the world as an exceptional instructional tool, as well as an accurate way of grading students’ work. According to Chowdhury and Faieza (2019), a rubric that is well designed can aid students to figure out their weaknesses and strengths in different topics. The authors also state that students can also gain factuality in the quality of their own work, as it is an unbiased method of grading. According to Jonsson and Svingby (2007), the use of rubrics does nor necessarily mean that the judgement and grading of the work will be easier per se. However, the authors point out that correct assessment can be successfully made easier by the use of a thorough structure of validity of the work being assessed.

      Interpretation of rubrics is done either as a group or individually. Therefore, one should know how to interpret the rubric. To correctly use rubrics, one should judge the extent of accuracy of reflection of the work to the goals stated, or the criteria. However, many instructors have not embraced self-assessment of students, as there is a likelihood that they may just award themselves A’s without proper revision of the work. However, according to Andrade (2007), when the assessment is done by the teacher, it might prove difficult to give feedback to the students when they are in need of it.

      The following is a rubric designed from the resources collected in the aim of teaching students of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS).

       

      Instructions: Against each marking criteria, tick in the box that best matches the resource efficiency. For specification of the marks awarded, comments can be added in the last columns.

       

       

       

      Marking criteria

                                                    Evaluation

      Excellent

      The resource highly effective and exceptionally carried out

      Above

      Average

      Resource averagely effective and well carried out  

      Sufficient

      Resource averagely effective and averagely carried out

      Minimal

      Resource negligibly effective and minimally carried out

      Poor

      Not appropriately done

      Additional Comments/ Feedback

      Support and engagement of diversity among students.

      It shows support for students regardless of where they are from. Promotes equity among all students and accommodates different students irrespective of their backgrounds, making them feel appreciated.

      It embraces different backgrounds of the students and effectively acknowledges the differences among them.

      It shows acknowledgement of difference in students’ backgrounds and vaguely embraces them but can be modified to cater diversity better. 

       It simply is not clear in the diversity among the students.

      It does not in any way show any acknowledgement or embrace in differences among students.

       

      Supports higher order thinking of students.

      The resource provides a room for students to gain 4c’s which are collaboration, communication, critical thinking or creativity to support higher order thinking among them.

      The resource engages the students enough for them to acquire all the 4c’s in the activities, whether in class or outdoors in groups or individually.

      The resource engages the students just enough to support higher order thinking.

      The resource engages the students when working in groups.

      The students get absent-minded during the practice. 

      Resource does not engage the students in any way to boost their higher order thinking levels.

       

      Appropriateness and effectiveness in the approaches of pedagogy used in the resource.

      The resource indicates clearly the use of successful Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), which is important in helping students gain a deeper grasp in what is taught (Persaud, 2019).

      It constitutes of well shown capacity to merge pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and normal class activities. Shows the teacher is paying attention to the pupils with activities like involving students by asking them of their opinions in different choices, which proves effectiveness of the approach.

      It vaguely shows capacity to merge pedagogical content knowledge with normal class activities, but with limited interaction with students. However, with slight adjustments, can reach the expectation.

      It does not involve much interaction with students, and vaguely shows efficient integration of pedagogical content knowledge.

      It shows interaction among students just enough to make them not lose focus.

      It does not show any bond between the teacher and students, and gets the students’ minds to wander and lack attention during the process.

       

      Suitability and appropriateness of the resource for the learning of HaSS

      The resource is supposed to help in teaching of Humanities and Social Sciences. It should therefore be relevant enough to be helpful in reaching the desired learning objective of the particular year level. The resource is therefore aligned in detail, to be suitable for students according to their levels.

      The resource is accurately connected to the description of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) learning objectives. It should guide the student in grasping the content of the course. It should also give the student a sense of what the course is about.

      The resource has accurately connected to the description of the course, but does not give the student a clear scope of the content of the course.

      The resource vaguely connects the students to the goal of the course and gives an indistinct reach of the course content.

      The resource vaguely connects the students to the goal of the course.

      The resource has not given the student any helpful information in line with the learning objectives of the course.

       

References

 

Persaud C. (2019, March 1). Retrieved from https://tophat.com/blog/pedagogy/#:~:text=1.1.-,Why%20is%20pedagogy%20important%3F,help%20students%20achieve%20deeper%20learning.

Brookhart S. M. (n.d). Retrieved on 13th October 2020 from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112001/chapters/What-Are-Rubrics-and-Why-Are-They-Important%C2%A2.aspx.

Chowdhury, F. (2019). Application of rubrics in the classroom: A vital tool for improvement in assessment, feedback and learning. International Education Studies12(1), 61-68.

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational research review2(2), 130-144.

Andrade H. (2007, December). Retrieved on 13th October 13, 2020 from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/dec07/vol65/num04/Self-Assessment_Through_Rubrics.aspx.

Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2000). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Corwin Press.

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?