Answer

Analysis of 1^st And 2^nd Kings

            1 and 2 Kings provides an insight into the case of kingship and the criteria implemented to establish their righteousness and loyalty to God. This paper explores the case of first and second Kings while providing a discussion of the role of prophets at the time.

Criteria for Judging the Kings’ Righteousness

            Different criteria are implemented in judging whether the king is righteous or not as represented by Jeremiah. One of the criteria included establishing if the kings only worshiped the God of Israel or encouraged the people to engage in idolatry and other gods. For instance, if a King remained loyal to worshipping the God of Israel, he was regarded as righteous unlike in the case whereby one engaged in idol worship. I think that the implementation of the criteria in ascertaining the righteousness of the kings was important for the plan of God because Jeremiah wanted to ensure that the person who was to undertake the kingship position would only serve God. Additionally, I believe that the criterion involving establishing a king’s loyalty to God was effective in achieving the plan of the creator since it was a fundamental step towards guaranteeing that the king remained faithful and obedient to God only and ensured that the people under his rule followed in their step. Arguably, it is a fundamental requirement to ensure that the king is only faithful to God to ensure that he blesses all the nations.

The Role of Prophets as Recorded in 1 and 2 Kings

            The fundamental role of the prophets in Israel during the historic time was to communicate God’s message to the people. Additionally, the prophets had a responsibility of acting as the Covenant’s watchdog. In this case, the prophets had the power to discourage people and the kings from engaging in idolatry. This is founded on the fact that God did not permit His people to worship other gods besides Him. The prophets also had a primary role of constantly reminding people that they had a duty and responsibility to follow and abide by the commandments of God. Moreover, it was also the duty of the prophets to remind the people that they had a duty to repent and focus on following God.

Jesus fulfills the role of a prophet in various ways. For instance, Jesus played the role of communicating God’s word and encouraging people to be only faithful to the creator. The fact that Jesus relied on parables to guide his teachings about God’s requirement suggests that Christ was fulfilling the role of educating people about God’s truth. Additionally, showing his loyalty to God when He called on him before performing miracles such as healing the sick and raising the dead is considered as a role carried out by Jesus depicting that he is a prophet. Jesus showed his loyalty to God through his action suggesting that he meets the qualifications of a prophet.

In the world today, the role of a prophet is enacted in different ways. True prophets are chosen by God. However, to achieve the primary responsibilities of the prophet, it is evident that the chosen person should share Jesus’ message to the people. It is evident that God still uses prophets today to prophesy about the future and deliver Christ’s requirements to the people. Despite this, the world today, false prophets still emerge. Therefore, Christians are guided to be vigilant in identifying false prophets to ensure that they only follow those who are faithful to God.

Conclusively, 1 and 2 Kings suggests that a King’s loyalty to the God of Israel was an effective criterion implemented to outline the righteousness of a person in that position. In his work, Jeremiah reveal that prophets had a fundamental role of sharing God’s message as reflected in Jesus’ case during his time.

28.QUESTION

 Leading Effective Teams. Managing People to Perform  

ANSWER

Analysis of 1^st And 2^nd Kings

            1 and 2 Kings provides an insight into the case of kingship and the criteria implemented to establish their righteousness and loyalty to God. This paper explores the case of first and second Kings while providing a discussion of the role of prophets at the time.

Criteria for Judging the Kings’ Righteousness

            Different criteria are implemented in judging whether the king is righteous or not as represented by Jeremiah. One of the criteria included establishing if the kings only worshiped the God of Israel or encouraged the people to engage in idolatry and other gods. For instance, if a King remained loyal to worshipping the God of Israel, he was regarded as righteous unlike in the case whereby one engaged in idol worship. I think that the implementation of the criteria in ascertaining the righteousness of the kings was important for the plan of God because Jeremiah wanted to ensure that the person who was to undertake the kingship position would only serve God. Additionally, I believe that the criterion involving establishing a king’s loyalty to God was effective in achieving the plan of the creator since it was a fundamental step towards guaranteeing that the king remained faithful and obedient to God only and ensured that the people under his rule followed in their step. Arguably, it is a fundamental requirement to ensure that the king is only faithful to God to ensure that he blesses all the nations.

The Role of Prophets as Recorded in 1 and 2 Kings

            The fundamental role of the prophets in Israel during the historic time was to communicate God’s message to the people. Additionally, the prophets had a responsibility of acting as the Covenant’s watchdog. In this case, the prophets had the power to discourage people and the kings from engaging in idolatry. This is founded on the fact that God did not permit His people to worship other gods besides Him. The prophets also had a primary role of constantly reminding people that they had a duty and responsibility to follow and abide by the commandments of God. Moreover, it was also the duty of the prophets to remind the people that they had a duty to repent and focus on following God.

Jesus fulfills the role of a prophet in various ways. For instance, Jesus played the role of communicating God’s word and encouraging people to be only faithful to the creator. The fact that Jesus relied on parables to guide his teachings about God’s requirement suggests that Christ was fulfilling the role of educating people about God’s truth. Additionally, showing his loyalty to God when He called on him before performing miracles such as healing the sick and raising the dead is considered as a role carried out by Jesus depicting that he is a prophet. Jesus showed his loyalty to God through his action suggesting that he meets the qualifications of a prophet.

In the world today, the role of a prophet is enacted in different ways. True prophets are chosen by God. However, to achieve the primary responsibilities of the prophet, it is evident that the chosen person should share Jesus’ message to the people. It is evident that God still uses prophets today to prophesy about the future and deliver Christ’s requirements to the people. Despite this, the world today, false prophets still emerge. Therefore, Christians are guided to be vigilant in identifying false prophets to ensure that they only follow those who are faithful to God.

Conclusively, 1 and 2 Kings suggests that a King’s loyalty to the God of Israel was an effective criterion implemented to outline the righteousness of a person in that position. In his work, Jeremiah reveal that prophets had a fundamental role of sharing God’s message as reflected in Jesus’ case during his time.

Work Cited

Angus, Loten. “Private-Equity Deals for Information Technology Soar as Companies Modernize Infrastructure.” The Wall Street Journal. Feb. 2021. https://www.wsj.com/articles/private-equity-deals-for-information-technology-soar-as-companies-modernize-infrastructure-11613176798

Full Copy of Article

Private-Equity Deals for Information Technology Soar as Companies Modernize Infrastructure

By Angus Loten

Feb 12, 2021

Private-equity investments in technology soared in the final months of 2020 as investors sought to take advantage of a rise in corporate IT spending.

Investors spent $65.17 billion last year on 2,138 private-equity deals with U.S.-based information technology companies, down from $72.47 billion over 2,007 deals in 2019 but far outpacing investments in any other sector, according to market research firm S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Nearly half of that spending came in the fourth quarter, which saw $31.73 billion in investments, compared with $11.22 billion in the previous quarter and up more than 90% from the same period in 2019, the research group said.

The amount spent on IT investments handily beat the next closest sector, healthcare, which drew in $9.26 billion in private-equity capital between October and December, the research group said.

Although the number of private-equity deals inched down in the closing months of the year, higher-priced acquisitions kept total spending on IT companies roughly on par with 2019, despite a slowdown in the early months of the coronavirus pandemic, the research group said. S&P Global Market Intelligence includes announced and closed late-stage venture-capital deals as a subset of private equity.

For investors, much of the perceived value in the information-technology sector comes from the pressure many businesses face to modernize their aging IT systems. This has become particularly acute in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, which exposed weaknesses in areas such as supply chain, fulfillment and customer service, analysts say.

The pandemic spurred chief information officers, among the primary customers of these technology companies, to redraw corporate IT strategies to cope with changing markets. These moves include a broader shift to cloud computing, automation and data analytics, according to chief information officers.

Thoma Bravo LLC in December announced a $9.6 billion acquisition of software and data analytics company RealPage Inc., marking the year’s largest deal.

Gartner Inc. expects world-wide spending on enterprise IT to grow 6.2% this year compared with 2020, to $3.9 trillion, the IT research and consulting firm said in a report last month. Spending is expected to be led by enterprise software, which is projected to grow 8.8% this year to roughly $505 billion.

“The cloud market is on the threshold of a major expansion,” said Platinum Equity Chief Executive Tom Gores. In December, the firm acquired Ingram Micro Inc., a cloud-based IT distributor and supply-chain management provider, for roughly $7.2 billion.

Mr. Gores said his firm saw Ingram Micro as a powerful platform with multiple ways to grow, given the high demand for public cloud infrastructure and new technologies, such as managed services, where companies turnover tasks such as cloud migration, maintenance and optimization to third-party tech firms.

“As we come out of the pandemic, this will be a crucial period for companies adapting to these new technologies,” Mr. Gores said.

Another private-equity firm, London-based Vitruvian Partners, last week reached an agreement to acquire a majority stake in Dutch internet and cloud-access provider Expereo BV. Irwin Fouwels, Expereo’s chief executive, said the move would help the company capitalize on opportunities in the global network and cloud connectivity industry.

Scott Denne, senior research analyst at 451 Research, a research division of S&P, said private equity has been a steadily growing presence in the tech merger-and-acquisition market for the last decade.

Private equity today accounts for roughly one in every three tech acquisitions, up from less than 10% a decade ago, he said. “As many tech- and software-focused private-equity firms have rung up large returns, more money has poured into the space,” Mr. Denne said.

Glenn Mincey, the national sector leader for private equity at professional services firm KPMG LLP, said tech investors are attracted by an increasing need for digital tools in retail, healthcare, hospitality and other sectors. Areas of interest include everything from inventory-management software to customer-service apps.

At the same time, he added, many IT companies could benefit from economies of scale and sophisticated management: “All of which seem like a perfect match for the private-equity playbook.”

For private-equity firms, spending on IT by companies across the economy offers a solid indicator of continued value.

The momentum in IT spending by companies across the economy is likely to fuel deal making in the year ahead, analysts say.

.