-
-
- QUESTION
Proposal for Standardized Tests
- Introduction
- Topic
1) Research question: Have standardized tests in the United States improved schools or demonstrated stronger student learning achievement?
2) Working thesis: Standardized tests in the United States have not improved schools and should be abolished and replaced with end-of-year subject tests because they will save time and money, lead to increased mastery of core subjects, and diminish dropout rates.
3) Angle: Standardized testing has made the gap between developed nations and the United States wider. Taxpayers and employers are paying the price of poorly educated graduates. No Child Left Behind has left nobody ahead, least of all our country’s educational standing among other developed nations.
- Context
1) Issues in education are in the news because budget cuts and school closures are tied to student performance on standardized tests.
2) Though I am a novice scholar, I am a parent and care deeply about education. I will refer to the expertise of several sources that will establish my credibility regarding standardized tests. The ideas of Hillocks (2002), McNeil and Valenzuela (2001), and Ravitch (2011), who are all experts on this topic, will help to establish my credibility.
- Audience
1) My primary audience will be educational stakeholders who are teachers, parents, or administrators.
2) My secondary audience is my professor and fellow classmates, some of whom may have experienced standardized tests or have school-aged children and will relate to the topic.
3) My audience shares my opinions and values and will likely be on my side.
- Evidence
- Research collected so far
I have found support for the recommendation to remove poorly designed tests that don’t measure what they should. Federal mandates such as No Child Left Behind have spurred their growth and the reward-and-punishment system that serves nobody well, least of all the people these tests were intended to help: students.
- Research to be collected
I will look for additional facts and statistics to demonstrate the gap between other nations and the United States. I will also look for experts who agree that there are implications for taxpayers and employers to show that the issues of schools affect the public at large. Finally, I will represent the opposing viewpoint and others who have suggested alternatives to standardized tests, including no testing at all. Yearly subject tests are better than other alternate recommendations that have been proposed, such as portfolios, because these tests would be objective determinants of learning rather than subject artifacts of courses.
III. Conclusion
I propose that end-of-year subject tests will be successful in raising the standards and expectations of our students while decentralizing control of students’ learning away from the government and politicians and in the control of teachers who know their students best. This solution is also better than having no assessments whatsoever, as that is unrealistic and does not prepare students for higher education or the workplace. The benefits of yearly subject tests include the time and money that will be saved by switching to end-of year subject tests; the collective energy of stakeholders in education—students, parents, teachers, administrators, and the public—will also be put to better use. I will develop my project to support these claims with research.
- References
Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
McNeil, L., & Valenzuela, A. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas. In G. Ornfield & M. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? (pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Century Foundation.
-
Subject | Writing a proposal | Pages | 9 | Style | APA |
---|
Answer
Proposal Pitch for Gender Discrimination
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Gender discrimination is a common topic in many societies in the world due to the increased demand for equality and fairness (Cunningham-Parmeter, 2014). According to Marshall (2015), gender discrimination is simply discrimination based on one’s sex or gender and may involve; unequal pay for male or female workers in one workplace, pregnancy discrimination or sexual harassment. On the other hand, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of the United States says that gender or sex discrimination involves the unfavorable treatment of people in a workplace or society due to the person’s gender or affiliation to an organization managed or formed by people of a specific gender (Clouatre, 2014). Ostensibly, gender discrimination is two-dimensional in the sense that it can either be men discriminating women or women discriminating men. In the United States, gender discrimination especially against women was prominent prior to the formulation of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 which sought to ensure equal opportunities and pay for all genders in the US. Despite these policies, Marshall (2015) observes that sexual harassment against women is still relatively high in American workplaces and homes, thus the need for stronger policies and tougher penalties for violators.
1.1 Research Question
Have the gender discrimination policies formulated in the United States reduced sexual harassment against women at the workplace and at home?
1.2 Working Thesis
Gender discrimination policies in the United States have failed in reducing and eliminating sexual harassment against women at the workplaces and homes, and should therefore be replaced by stronger and stiffer policies to ensure women in the society are appreciated and respected just like men.
1.3 Angle
Gender discrimination has been on a decline in the United States since the enactment of the 1964 Civil Rights Laws. However, sexual harassment has remained prevalent as it has taken new dimensions especially at the workplace. Unlike before, sexual harassment has become silent and difficult to spot as people have stopped using the previous aggressive techniques. Today, it is propagated through social sites and workplace meetings whenever people make comments about women. On the other hand, most victims have failed to report these cases while others have failed to recognize when they are being harassed thus allowing the perpetrators to continue undermining the efforts made towards eliminating gender discrimination in the United States.
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
Gender discrimination in the United States has been witnessed for many years even before the enactment of the 1964 Act. In fact, research conducted to this point of the study indicates that women were mostly discriminated by men in the country especially when it came to political positions, ownership of property and adjudication of responsibilities especially at home. Nonetheless, continued civilization and civil rights grouped began campaigning for equality thus leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that contained policies that guided the distribution of resources and opportunities with the aim of reducing and eliminating any discrimination in the country. Although adopted unanimously and encompasses tough penalties for perpetrators, the laws have been overtaken by time as the gender discrimination acts have taken a new dimension.
Clouatre (2014), Cunningham-Parmeter (2014) and Marshall (2015) have also second the argument and based on their observations and believes, this research will discuss some of the new methods used by the perpetrators to discriminate against women especially through sexual harassment. Through these sources and more that will be collected during the research, I will be able to develop suggestions that could be adopted by civil groups, the government and other stakeholders in order to improve the country’s chances of reducing the vice. As the main recipients to the acts of sexual harassment, women will also be guided on how to detect acts of sexual harassment at the workplace as it has become more silent and uses new dimensions that were not used before. The women will also be guided on how to report these cases to avoid victimization and ensure the perpetrators are punished for improved gender equality.
The primary or main audience will be the civil rights stakeholders who include: the government, civil rights groups (both local and international) and women in the society. My secondary audience is my university’s female professors and students who may have faced sexual harassment or are aware of it as they will be able to know how to detect or handle the situation whenever it occurs or has a probability of occurring. Finally, I believe my audience agrees to my arguments and by the end of my research, will possibly agree to my opinion thereby adopting and sharing it accordingly.
Finally, based on the available evidence, gender discrimination in the United States is still being propagated through sexual harassment targeting women at the workplace and at home. The collected research also shows that these behaviors have adopted new techniques that make it difficult for women to detect in order to report or complain about. Besides, it is clear through the collected data that some women fail to report sexual harassment advances on them and this undermines the progress made towards eliminating gender discrimination. In contrast, other authors emphasize that the sexual harassment policies and laws are among the toughest in the entire gender discrimination policies in the country. Nonetheless, the behavior is still rife as shown by the available statistics. Accordingly, the available resources emphasize the need to discuss the issue on sexual harassment and the measures that can be taken to stop women from being harassed.
In presenting my arguments, I will also seek additional information that will help to demonstrate the existence of sexual harassment in the United States. This will mainly be in form of statistical presentations that will compare the level of sexual harassment in the country in relation to other gender discrimination acts like unequal pay and pregnancy discrimination. I will also identify statistics, showing how the country is performing in relation to its neighbors and other countries all over the world in terms of sexual harassment. In conclusion, I will also review opposing literature in order to build a justifiable case from their point of view. Indeed, sexual harassment is a leading gender discrimination act that affects women in the US while at the workplace and at home.
3.0 CONCLUSION
I propose that gender discrimination policies in the United States be stiffened and improved in order to recognize silent sexual harassments like that conducted in social media and work place meetings. On the other hand, women should also be informed on the silent sexual harassments in order to make them aware of the behaviors. Lastly, there should be discrete reporting procedures in every institution in order to encourage more women to report cases of sexual harassment without fear of victimization. These solutions will therefore improve the country’s ranking in terms of gender discrimination thereby promoting equal opportunities and fair treatment for all genders.
ns
References
Civil rights — employment discrimination — executive order prohibits federal government and contractor employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. (2015). Harvard Law Review, 128(4), 1304-1311. Clouatre, D. (2014). Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Salem Press Encyclopedia, Cunningham-Parmeter, K. (2014). (Un)equal protection: why gender equality depends on discrimination. Northwestern University Law Review, 109(1), 1-56. Marshall, A. (2015). Sexual Harassment: United States and Beyond.
|
Related Samples
The Role of Essay Writing Services in Online Education: A Comprehensive Analysis
Introduction The...
Write Like a Pro: Effective Strategies for Top-Notch Explication Essays
Introduction "A poem...
How to Conquer Your Exams: Effective Study Strategies for All Learners
Introduction Imagine...
Overcoming Writer’s Block: Strategies to Get Your Essays Flowing
Introduction The...
Optimizing Your Online Learning Experience: Tips and Tricks for Success
The world of education...