Answer

Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP)

Introduction

Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) is a wide sector-led initiative with properly defined aim of developing a great focus on work safeguarding while integrating a range of responses that fully support people’s initiatives of improving and resolving their current circumstances (Lawson et al., 2014). It is basically engaging different persons in determining expected outcomes both at the beginning and middle of an operation and ascertaining the extent of outcome likely to be realized. This work is, in most cases, supported by the Local Government Association (LGA) and the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) together with other national partners (Cooper et al., 2016). MSP aims at achieving a highly personalized approach for enabling quality safeguarding by people to establish a practice that entirely focuses on achievement of a meaningful improvement of workers’ circumstances as opposed to merely drawing conclusions from baseless investigations. This report encompasses a detailed description on making safeguarding personal, evaluation of the current research and its effectiveness together with key elements of health and safety legislation and duty of care and how they relate to personalized safeguarding.

It is an approach that focuses on utilization of available social work skills, supporting and empowering key principles upheld by adults in making choices and controlling the manner by which they want to lead their own life. This can be achieved through establishing a cultural practice shift in response to what regards safeguarding as either more or less effective as per the adults’ perspective (Hodder Education, 2013). In short, it is a clear comprehension of how conversations held among people relate to mechanisms through which safeguarding circumstances can be manipulated in a way to enhance effective involvement, choices, control mechanisms as well as improving the quality of the worker’s lives, safety models and their general well-being. MSP further advocates for incorporation of concerns about making people their own lives’ experts (Lawson, Lewis, & Williams, 2014), and operating towards identification of exact outcome of their original expectations.

Additionally, it raises concerns on need for achieving meaningful improvements in people’s life patterns for reasons of preventing neglection and abuse incidences likely to occur in the near future as well as identifying different methodologies for offering protection. Such programs are based on variations in people’s thinking capacity, operational circumstances, histories and lifestyles, a factor making personalized safeguarding arrangements not prescriptible (Klee & Williams, 2013). This, therefore, means there is need to opt for a more personalized approach. Developing a personalized safeguarding culture puts more focus on outcomes largely desired by populations together with support needs and care quality for those likely to be abused. It may be equally healthy to consider roles embedded when trying to make the entire concept of ‘Making Safeguarding Personal’ highly implementable and adaptable (PACE, 2014). Establishment and development of broader participation strategies across agencies with the goal of achieving easy accessibility to information to offer safeguarding support to persons as well as focusing on more qualitative reports regarding outcomes and advocacies for generating quantitative measures.

It upholds policies and procedures for working in line with a more personalized safeguarding approach, strategies for enabling practitioners work collaboratively in a manner that describes skills needed to support shifts in a culture and implementation of person-centered approaches relating to work environment risks (Redley et al., 2015). It is considered crucial for all safeguarding partners to initiate a broad community approach for establishing appropriate safeguarding plans, making it quite vital for organizations to recognize the fact that these initiatives are steered towards protection of individuals by making it entirely person-led and outcome-focused.

The personal safeguarding toolkit is set out in a unique modular format with a summary of key areas of concern ranging from theories, areas of specialism, models, skills and approaches needed and acquainted with safeguarding practitioners (Cooper et al., 2016). It can equally be utilized as a developmental resource for allowing updates on amendments to ensure all initiatives are clearly outlined in making these practices more effective and publicly known by social workers. It puts more focus on driving a culturally defined shift among partner organizations for imbedding MSP principles into processes, structures and practice. It aims at developing a clear understanding of what people aspire to achieve, agree, negotiate and further record all desired outcomes while cooperating with their advocates or relevant representatives in cases of lack of capacity to find effective solutions (Manthorpe, 2014). It further determines the most appropriate applicable strategies to ensure realization of the best results while monitoring from the other end how far these expectations have been met.

This whole procedure is overseen by the Care Acts, which in most cases, call for Local Authorities to ensure necessary arrangement for an independent and appropriate advocation to support and represent any adult subjected to a safeguarding enquiry with substantial difficulties. It enhances the virtue of cooperation among partnership members to ensure support provision to any person at the risk of suffering abuse or experiencing neglect of their need for quality care (Lawson, Lewis & Williams, 2014). In any case one is over the age of eighteen years but still subjected to receipt of children services and care, there is need to raise issues affecting safeguarding progress and enable them be handled as a matter of course involving the adult safeguarding team. It makes meaningful enquiries and ensures others equally do the same thing whenever there are significant signs of exploit, abuse and risks to human health and development (Klee & Williams, 2013). Moreover, the Care Act ensures that all enquiries made regarding personalized safeguarding are well established on whether there is need to take up an action to stop the abuse or neglect and specifies on who should do it by setting up a safeguarding adults board.

The key concepts in safeguarding revolve around different applicable health and safety legislations as well as duty of care. The concept of duty of care includes taking the earliest possible opportunities to hold conversations with the party likely to be affected to enable them identify the most realistic outcomes to make their feelings, views, beliefs and wishes central during decision making concerning the manner in which they wish to proceed in (Cooper et al., 2016). It entails closely working with all individuals within their operational contexts to enable the virtue of positive risk taking and enable convenience in ensuring safeguarding is highly appropriate for the victim. It equally calls for holding honest discussion regarding possible risks, options and benefits that can result into a more focused risk enablement operation (PACE, 2014). It further grants them a sense of self control and esteem to enable them effectively safeguard themselves through consideration of their own safety and safety of others.

This is considered a flexible approach as it incorporates persons from a wide range of varying options with direct response to their life experiences, allowing full support of every individual to ensure exploration of responses and choices. People vary as some rarely wish for formal proceedings and whenever it happens without their consent or agreement they become stressed in every part of the way which may take quite some time for them to regain their confidence and esteem through self-protection and action taking (Hodder Education, 2013). MSP must therefore pay respect to autonomy and individual independence as well as their basic right to family life, as articulated in the Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Overriding someone’s wishes only occur on condition that it is lawfully accepted, and regularly updating the adult in question through consistent discussions concerning factors contributing to neglection and abuse to derive relevant data during proceedings on enquiries made. There may also be need for access to forms of resolution or justice, for example through restorative justice or civil law to ensure persons are made fully aware of the available options or approaches that may be of great help for promoting their personal well-being.

Health and safety legislations in making safeguarding personal revolves around personal protection from harm and promotion of people’s welfare, making it everyone’s responsibility. It aims at evading maltreatments, preventing health and development impairment, ensuring people operate in conditions that consistently provide safe and effective care as well as taking considerable actions to enable realization of best personal outcomes (Manthorpe, 2014). All trustees entitled to vulnerable groups must operate or act in a manner that best interests them to ensure opting for reasonable precautions for preventing exposure to uncertainties and harm. Having such legislations in place within any operating organizations further promotes children’s welfare by enhancing their confidence in volunteers, trustees, parents, staff together with the public at large. There is prompt need to safeguard people by making the entire ideology personal, especially by charity personnel operating in nations where people have a likelihood of facing different additional abuse and exploitation risks (Klee & Williams, 2013). These safeguarding initiatives entail all procedures relating to child protection policies for dealing with all issues of concern on abuse and exploitation.

In conclusion, making safeguarding personal should not only be considered a mere professional process, but a factor requiring general culture change. There should be properly designed and meaningful recommendations that cover specific actions needed to be taken whenever any service provision service channel has allegedly undergone abuse. It is key to ensure that safeguarding is qualitatively embedded into different professional practices to limit the amount of risks people are entirely exposed to. Abiding by the existing statutory guidance is essential in ensuring all service operators are kept at the forefront of any service developments, properly and fully represented at the highest organizational level. Generally, there is need for creation and increase of awareness on importance of making safeguarding personal among different user populations and enhance service users’ knowledge and acquaintance to ensure full personal safeguarding from incidences of abuse and neglect.