Answer

Human Cloning

Human cloning refers to a time-delayed undistinguishable/identical twin. A clone of ten possesses the exact/precise DNA or genetic material of the original person or source. For instance, in case a clone is developed of an adult, such a clone would need to develop within the uterus of a woman and be delivered through normal childbirth (New Atlantis, 2015). A clone of a given individual would possess its own thought and memory independent of the source or original person. Two techniques can be employed in cloning humans or mammals. The first method involves embryo splitting. Embryo splitting refers to the artificial splitting/division of an embryo (Piotrowska, 2014). This similar process often happens naturally resulting into the production of identical twins. Thomas (2013) asserts that, since identical twins possesses a similar genetic code, they are considered clones of each other. Embryo division is not common because embryos can only be divided a few times, producing only a limited number of clones. The second technique is the somatic nuclear replacement.  Contrary to the embryo splitting technique, somatic nuclear replacement can lead to the generation of an indefinite number of clones of the same person, making it a principal target of religious leaders, political figures, and some scientists (Piotrowska, 2014). The cloning of Dolly the sheep was accomplished through nuclear replacement procedure, which involves the transfer of DNA from an individual’s cells to a naturally/genetically blank egg.     

The significance of human cloning lies in the fact that the idea concerning its legalization has presented a tricky puzzle to researchers and scholars from various disciplines. Cloning of humans happens to be a complex issue associated with several differing opinions. Since the development of “Dolly” the sheep, the issue of human cloning has transformed into a significant global debate (Thomas, 2013). While others, particularly those who embrace science and technology, argue that human cloning should be a reality, other claim that human cloning is religiously, ethically, and morally wrong. Opponents of human cloning advocate the intervention of the government by placement of ban on this issue. For instance, the American Society has been noted to express negative feeling on human cloning and is pushing for its ban According to Levine et al., (2013), 70% of U.S citizens do not welcome the idea of human cloning. Meacham (2014) point out that the denouncement of human cloning by many individuals is attributed to the far-fetched stories and widespread misconceptions about it. As such, the exploration of this topic is essential in unveiling its myths and realities, thereby contributing to a clear determination of whether it should be legalized or banned.

This study will explore the issue of human cloning by focusing on its benefits and harms. A conclusion/deduction on whether human cloning should or should not be embraced will based on the weight of benefits its presents against its harms. The research will accomplish its objectives by focusing on secondary sources of information such as peer-reviewed articles, websites related to the topic (such as humanCloning .org), and published books addressing the topic. Some of the primary sources of information that will be sought are documentaries on human cloning, and personal opinions from experts and members of the public. Such an approach will largely contribute to the comprehension of the issue of human cloning.