Answer

Quality Improvement Initiative Based on Evidence-Based Practice

Quality is the main objective in dynasties of the provision of goods and services and, therefore, maintaining quality standards leads to sustainable operations. Quality improvement is one of the major concerns of management at various levels in organizations. Briggs (2019) asserts that improving quality standards is composed of corporate efforts from the participants, clients, and stakeholders. This essay aims at providing the problem or the issue that needs improvements, the significance of quality improvement, demonstrations of support from previous studies, and evaluation of quality improvement. Also, the study gives identification of variables in the research, as well as the steps involved in quality improvement. Finally, the study will explain whether quality improvement initiatives have yielded improvements in a school-based setting through the stated hypothesis testing.

Problem in Practice

There are high expectations that students are generally not performing at the level needed to meet state standards. Knecht (2019) argues that data from school archives indicates that students are held to different expectations in different settings and at times, the expectations are too low. Denman and Al-Mahrooqi (2019) asserts that teachers and assistant teachers are unsure of what students are capable of achieving because they have high expectations, but the reality turns out that learners perform poorly. Teachers are in fear that if they set their expectations too high, students will be frustrated by the challenge, and they might avoid school. The staff has decided to devise methods that build scaffolding activities into their lessons so that students get the support that is needed to meet the high teachers’ expectations.

The Need for Quality Improvement

Building a community with learners that focus on productivity is needed for low student achievements across content areas and lack of student interest in learning suggests that there is need to investigate the different instrumental approaches (Denman & Al-Mahrooqi, 2019). Teachers and school staff are aware that research on the effectiveness of students’ learning strategies contribute to both achievement and attitudes towards learning and more specifically, in an urban setting. Teachers have found out that efforts to designing and implementing projects that involve students’ learning in various methods and participating in common teaching practices lead to productive learning (Knecht, 2019). Teachers are struggling with how to design and implement a productive lesson that focuses on improving the quality of lessons offered to students to achieve high levels of successful learning.

Previous Research Results

According to the study done by Knecht (2019), students do not perform as expected out of them to meet the state achievement tests, and they appear to be bored and disconnected in the classroom setting despite many attempts to provide quality instructions. In student surveys, there is a considerable concern that majority of students who claim that class materials used by teachers have no connection with the student out-of-school lives. An analysis that was done by Denman and Al-Mahrooqi (2019) indicates that the work provided to students has no severe effect in achieving the state standards demand. However, teachers have found it challenging to increase the needs of students without putting pressure and risk of failure. Teachers have also found out that their efforts to design and implement projects that consist of students and grouping of peers has resulted in little productive results (Denman & Al-Mahrooqi, 2019). All these studies provide evidence there is a need for quality improvement in a school-based setting.

Steps Necessary to Implement the Quality Improvement Initiative

1. Student Engagement. According to Briggs (2019), teachers have hypothesized that the root cause of students performing below the state standards achievements is a failure to engage students in inhibiting student learning. Engaging varies substantially between classes and also among the students. But there is a large building structure of several students that need to be engaged in the learning process. There is evidence that engaging learning dramatically improves their ability to gain interest in studies and connect the outcome of their lives after school.
2. They are increasing the Variety of Teaching Strategies Used in Classrooms. Knecht (2019) affirms that there is need to change the instructional methods that are used in classrooms to be more successful with the students that are involved in the class. Teachers will make efforts to ensure that their classes are more attractive to students since the majority of the learners are teacher-centered and rely mostly on worksheets.
3. Equitable Distribution of Questions and Student Work Across the Class. There is evidence that focuses on teacher questioning, which is overwhelmingly at the knowledge level. Knecht (2019) asserts that teachers have to device mechanisms that ensure that all learners in the classroom have access to a competed for an important higher order of questions to boost their revision abilities and hence improve their overall performance.
4. Increasing Rigor in Classroom and Supporting Learners in Achieving Higher Levels of Achievement. Teachers are tasked with the work of ensuring that learners are not only achieving higher grades but also progressing in knowledge. Provision of support by implementing the ideas that are planned by the teaching staff creates a rigorous work for students while at the same time promoting student engagement in classroom participation (Knecht, 2019).
5. Encouraging and Scaffolding Student Thinking. Students are acclimated to expecting only to do the low-level thinking work, which may not be appropriate for improving performance (Knecht, 2019). Therefore learners are supposed to be encouraged to adopt the behavior of handling more complex tasks in the classroom, and if they experience challenges, then they can consult their teachers. Teachers are also in their best position in providing a kind of scaffolding to students to increase their efficiency in exhibiting perseverance in answering questions of higher thinking.

How to Evaluate the Quality Improvement Initiative

Evaluating the quality improvement initiatives in schools is done by testing whether the adherence to the steps involved in quality improvement has been accepted by both the learners and the teachers (Knecht, 2019). This is followed by a comprehensive examination of the effects of the initiatives to the delivery of student-centered learning objectives which are tested by involving a dialogue between the learners and the teachers on separate occasions. Finally, accessing the student experience of learning objective is done to confirm whether the quality improvement initiative has worked or needs future amendments. Denman and Al-Mahrooqi (2019) states that exposing learners to complex questions that require critical thinking and reviewing the responses acts as the best method to evaluate the effectiveness of the initiative. Finally, after the performance results are released if the students have met the state set standards proves the effectiveness of the quality improvement initiative while poor performance will indicate non-effectiveness of the quality improvement initiative.

The variables that will be considered for this essay will be the students’ age, performance before and after the quality improvement initiatives are implemented. The hypothesis test that best fits the study is the null hypothesis against the alternative hypothesis that is stated as follows;

H₀: Students exposed to quality improvement initiative meets the standard state achievements

H₁: Students exposed to quality improvement initiative do not meet the standard state achievements

After testing the hypothesis, if the results are such that students meet the state standards on performance achievements, the null hypothesis is accepted, and the alternative is rejected (Briggs, 2019). If the other way round happens to be true, the null hypothesis is rejected, and the alternative hypothesis is accepted, meaning that rejecting the null hypothesis quality improvement initiatives are not effective, and the reverse is true.

In conclusion, quality improvement initiatives in the school setting are based on whether the learners accept the initiatives and improve the performance and meet the state standards. Quality improvement is noted in situations where if the set hypothesis is tested and the impacts of the initiative are positive. Then there is a high level of confidence that the initiatives are conforming to the students while if the initiatives yield to negative results, there is a high level of confidence that the initiatives are not contributing to quality improvement. Quality improvements are desirable and work in situations where the learners and the teachers implement the steps necessary for higher performance expectations. Quality improvement indicators are the major observable facts that initiatives have worked or not specifically in a school setting.

]