QUESTION
‘International Strategic Management 2020_21 Assignment 1 Brief(1) (1)’ with you
Econ 142A: Industrial Organization Nilopa Shah Homework Assignment 3 (based on textbook Chapters 6 and 8) Question 1 (Perfect Price Discrimination) The demand for answering machines is given by . The cost function of a producer of answering machines is given by: . Consider each of the cases described below: CASE 1: The answering machine industry is perfectly competitive. CASE 2: The answering machine industry is a monopoly that charges a uniform price. CASE 3: The answering machine industry is a perfectly discriminating monopoly. For each Case (1) through (3), calculate the following: (i) the price paid by consumers (ii) the quantity bought (iii) consumer surplus (iv) producer surplus/industry profits (v) total surplus (vi) dead weight loss {Hint: Under perfect price discrimination, each consumer is charged his/her willingness-to-pay. Hence, you will not be able to calculate (i) for Case (3). You can still answer (ii) through (vi) for this case, using your calculations from Cases (1) and (2) above.} Question 2 (Non-Linear Pricing) A monopolist faces two types of consumers. The inverse demand function of each type-1 consumer is , while the inverse demand function of each type-2 consumer is: . The firm’s cost function is given by: . Suppose first that the firm is able to tell whether a consumer is of type-1 or type-2 (e.g. by checking some form of ID). Suppose also that the firm uses a two-part tariff with each type. (a) Calculate the fixed fee and the price per unit for each type of consumers. {Hint: Draw diagrams to help you work through the problems.} Suppose now that the firm cannot tell whether a consumer is of type-1 or type-2. Therefore, suppose that the firm decides to offer the following packages: PACKAGE 1: 50 units packaged together for a total price of $2,500 PACKAGE 2: 40 units packaged together for a total price of $2,200 Q = 600 − P/4 C(q) = 100q P = 100 − 2Q P = 80 − Q C(Q) = 200 + 10Q Department of Economics of UC Irvine 1 4 Econ 142A: Industrial Organization Nilopa Shah (b) For each package and each consumer-type, calculate willingness-to-pay (area under the respective demand curve) and associated consumer surplus (given price of each package). (c) Comparing the consumer surplus enjoyed by each consumer-type for each package, decide which package will be preferred by which consumer-type. (d) Assuming that there are 100 consumers of type-1 and 50 consumers of type-2, calculate the monopolist’s profits. Question 3 (Price Discrimination by Indicators) A monopolist sells to consumers who belong to two groups: group-I and group-II. The aggregate behavior of group-I consumers is captured by the demand function: , while the aggregate behavior of group-II consumers is captured by the different demand function: . (a) Draw the two demand curves (show both intercepts). The monopolist has the following cost function: . We shall distinguish two cases. CASE 1: The monopolist cannot tell which consumer belongs to which group and, therefore, must charge the same price to all consumers. (b) Derive the aggregate demand curve, inverse demand curve and the marginal revenue curve. {Hint: The demand curve has two-parts: demand when and . Similarly, the inverse demand and marginal revenue curves also have two-parts: when and .} (c) Draw on the same diagram, the aggregate demand curve and the corresponding marginal revenue curve (clearly mark out all the intercepts). (d) What price will the monopolist charge? (e) Calculate consumer surplus for the two groups, the monopolist’s profits and total surplus. CASE 2: The monopolist can tell which consumer belongs to which group and, therefore, can charge different prices to the two groups. (f) What prices will the monopolist charge to the two groups? (g) Calculate consumer surplus for the two groups, the monopolist’s profits and total surplus. (h) Who benefits from this type of price discrimination and who loses? DI(p) = 20 − p/2 DII(p) = 24 − p/2 C(q) = 4q P > 40 P ≤ 40 Q < 4 Q ≥ 4 Department of Economics of UC Irvine 2 4 Econ 142A: Industrial Organization Nilopa Shah Question 4 (Bertrand and Cournot Competition) (continuation of Question 2 from Assignment 2) Answer the following sub-questions based on the information provided. You will draw explanatory graphs associated with each market structure as is relevant to the explanation. Consider an (inverse) demand curve P = 30 – Q. And a total cost curve of C(Q) = 12Q. (a) Monopoly Market – already answered in Q5 Assignment 2. (b) Perfectly Competitive Market – already answered in Q5 Assignment 2. (c) Instead consider two firms (Firm A and Firm B) competing in this market. They simultaneously decide on the price of the product in a typical Bertrand fashion while producing an identical product. Both firms face the same cost function: C(qA) = 12qA and C(qB) = 12qB, where qA is the output of Firm A and qB is the output of Firm B. (i) What will be the Bertrand-Nash equilibrium price (pB) chosen by each firm? Explain. (ii) What is the equilibrium quantity (qB) sold by each firm and the total market output (QN)? (iii) What, if any, is the dead-weight loss in this case? (d) Now consider a typical Cournot duopoly situation such that the market is being served by two firms (Firm 1 and Firm 2) that simultaneously decide on the level of output to sell in the market, while producing an identical product. The total output of the industry is Q = q1 + q2, where q1 and q2 are the output of Firm 1 and 2, respectively. Each firm has a symmetric cost function: C(q1) = 12 q1 and C(q2) = 12 q2. (i) Write down the (inverse) market demand function for this situation and the resultant profit functions for both firms. (ii) Derive the reaction functions for Firm 1 and Firm 2. (iii) What is the Cournot-Nash equilibrium output level (qN) for each firm? Explain. (iv) Calculate the market price of the product (pN). (v) What will be the total market output (QN) for both firms together? (vi) Calculate the allocative inefficiency resulting from this market structure. Compare it to that under the monopoly market in part (a). (e) What can you say, in general, about the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantities and prices as the number of sellers (n) competing in the industry rises? Department of Economics of UC Irvine 3 4 Econ 142A: Industrial Organization Nilopa Shah (f) Now, think of two firms colluding to earn monopoly profits by each agreeing to enjoy half the market share. (i) If each firm honors this agreement, calculate each firm’s level of output and the resulting profit enjoyed by each firm. (ii) In general, when can such an arrangement be feasible, that is, when will each firm have an incentive to honor such an agreement? Note: This question does not require any reading of Ch 9. For part (i), follow the instructions provided to carry out the calculation. For part (ii), you are going to use general game theoretic intuition on how rival players interact. Question 5 (based on Exercise 8.3 from the textbook) Bonus Question – will be graded for Extra Credit only (a) What is the Bertrand trap faced by firms competing on setting prices? Explain in a few sentences. Now let us consider the current trend of online sales. E-commerce (selling products in an online marketplace) represents an increasing fraction of economic transactions in many different industries compared to physical brick-and-mortar stores that sold products in the past. (b) Does e-commerce create a Bertrand trap? (Hint: Discuss in terms of how online shopping affects (i) product differentiation and (ii) capacity constraints of sellers.) (c) How can e-commerce firms possibly avoid the trap? (Hint: what strategies can help an online firm to distinguish itself from its competitor? You can use examples from the real world to support your answer.) Department of Economics of UC Irvine 4 4
Subject | Business | Pages | 19 | Style | APA |
---|
Answer
Urban Mobility
Table of Contents
2.2 The changing landscape. 11
2.4 Satara Macro-Environmental Factors. 13
iii. Social-cultural Factors. 15
- Technological Factors. 16
- Demographic Factors. 17
- Ecological/Environmental Factors. 18
- Conclusion. 18
- References. 19
UK and Australia Macro-environmental Factors
|
Vital statistics 2019 |
United Nations Estimates |
Insurance Statistics |
Regional Comparison |
Economic risk |
U.K. (Manchester) |
Nominal GDP (USD bn) -2743.59 |
Literacy Rate (%)- n.a |
Premiums written (life) USD mil- 26,422 |
United Kingdom- (CRT-1) |
Economic Risk (Low)- UK has spent a GDP of 190 billion (9.5) of nominal GDP on economic stimulus measures. |
Country Risk Tire (CRT) |
Population (mll)- 66.9 |
Urbanization (%)- 83.9 |
Premiums written (non-life) USD mil- 10,202 |
France (CRT-1) |
Political risk (Very Low)- |
|
GDP Per Capita (%)- 1.4 |
Dependency Ratio (%)- 57.1 |
Premiums Growth (%) -3.8 |
Germany (CRT-1) |
Financial System Risk (very low)- Owing to the current crisis, the bank of England has shifted to a highly accommodative monetary policy plan |
|
Inflation Rate (%)- 1.8 |
Life Expectancy (years)- 81.1 |
|
Ireland (CRT-2) |
|
. |
Real GDP Growth (%)- 1.8 |
Median Age (years)- 40.2 |
|
Italy (CRT-2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Spain (CRT-2) |
|
|
Vital statistics 2019 |
United Nations Estimates |
Insurance Statistics |
Regional Comparison |
Economic risk |
Australia (Melbourne) |
Nominal GDP (USD bn) – 447.72 |
Literacy Rate (%)- n.a |
Premiums written (life) USD mil- 6,126 |
Australia (CRT-1) |
Economic Risk (Low)- The government has offered EUR 38 billion (9.5 of GDP) for tax relief, compensation, and healthcare
|
|
Population (mll)- 9.0 |
Urbanization (%)- 58.7 |
Premiums written (non-life) USD mil- 13.584 |
Germany (CRT-1) |
Political Risk (very low) |
Country Risk (CRT) |
GDP Per Capita USD)- 50,023 |
Dependency Ratio (%)- 50.6 |
Premiums Growth (%) -3.7 |
Italy (CRT-2) |
Financial System Risk (Very Low)- The insurance industry in Australia is stable.
|
|
Inflation Rate (%)- 1.5 |
Life Expectancy (years)- 81.9 |
|
Poland (CRT-2) |
|
|
Real GDP Growth (%)- 1.6 |
Median Age (years)- 43.2 |
|
Slovenia (CRT-2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Switzerland (CRT-2) |
|
Comparison between Manchester and Melbourne Mobility Analysis
Manchester Mobility Analysis
|
|
Emerging |
Aspiring |
Contender |
|
Top Performer |
Global Leader |
|
Congestion |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
The reliability of Public Transport |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Performance and resilience |
Transport Safety |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
Integrated Mobility |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Modal Diversity |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Vision as well as Strategy |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Investment |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
Vision and Leadership |
Innovation |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Environment |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Environmental Sustainability ingenuities |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Public transport destiny |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
Transport Affordability |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
Air Quality |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Service and Inclusion |
Customer Satisfaction |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Accessibility |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Melbourne Mobility Analysis |
Congestion |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
Public Transport Reliability |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Transport Safety |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Mobility |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
Performance and resilience |
Modal Diversity |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
Vision and Strategy |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
Investment |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
Innovation |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
Regulatory Environment |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
Vision and Leadership |
Environmental Sustainability initiatives |
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public transport destiny |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
Transport Affordability |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Air Quality |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Service and Inclusion |
Customer Satisfaction |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
|
|
|
Accessibility |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
ü |
|
Key Mobility Statistics between Manchester and Melbourne
Manchester |
Options in Public Transport |
Monthly public transport pass |
GDP per capita |
Principal trans[ort authorities |
|
Commuter rail, bus, light rail including tram, |
US$90 |
US $61,273 (£49,792) (2017) |
Transport of Greater Manchester (TfDM) |
Melbourne |
Public Transport Options |
Monthly public transport pass |
GDP per capita |
Principal trans[ort authorities |
|
Commuter rail, bus, light rail including tram, ferry |
US$ 104 |
US$ 52,678 (A$ 77,392) (2017) |
Department of Transport (as Public Transport Victoria and VicRoads |
Journey Modal Split between Manchester and Melbourne
Manchester |
Private Car |
Public Transport |
Walking |
Bicycle |
|
52% |
18% |
25% |
5% |
Melbourne |
Private Car |
Public Transport |
Walking |
Bicycle |
|
72% |
9% |
16% |
2% |
Future of Mobility Capability
Manchester
Significant Passive Environment Proactive environment Proactive environment
to work with (a number of barriers) (some barriers) (Few barriers)
Melbourne
Significant Passive Environment Proactive environment Proactive environment
to work with (a number of barriers) (some barriers) (Few barriers)
Strengths and Weaknesses
Manchester |
Strengths |
Challenges |
|
– Detailed plans cover network integration, bus reorganization, rail improvements, congestion, and air quality -The reliability of Metrolink trams is very high. More than 90% arrive safely and less than 1% are canceled. -Transport has been Manchester’s main priority. |
– Bus networks are the city’s main public transport service and are very inconsistent. – All trains that are not locally controlled suffer from frequent price hikes. – Road schemes take up the largest share of transport investment and contribute to pollution and congestion. |
Melbourne |
– The city is committed to investing heavily in escalating the transport network to the suburbs. -There is the availability of a significant number of open data portals as well as APIs on transport metrics -Smart payment systems in popular transport are increasing including some mobile platforms. |
– The city has a high rate of pedestrian accidents. Without dedicated space for the city’s extensive tram network close to 80% run in mixed traffic. – There are few incentives for switching away from vehicles fueled by fossil. – The bub-and-spoke transports do not have an orbital connection leading to a high proportion of private car usage. |
Forces of the Macro-Environment in Australia
Melbourne |
Demographics |
Economic Forces |
Political Forces |
Socio-cultural forces |
Technological forces |
Ecological Forces |
|
Population (25 million) |
2019 GDP (1.29 trillion US$)
|
Stable government |
Upper class (5-10%) Middle class (more than 20 percent) Lower class (More than 30 percent) |
Investments of around $326 million to purchase new technology |
|
Manchester |
Population-2020= (68 million) |
2019 GDP (2.744 trillion US$) -Inflation 1.94% -Corporate tax rate 1R% |
Stable government |
Good education and healthcare systems |
Investments of around $65 billion to purchase new technology |
The country generates approximately more than 127 billion pounds per year in tourism |
Establishing a sustainable transportation system is one of the challenges affecting urban centers owing to the rapid increase of population and preferences. The demand for effective mobility has forced automobile companies to introduce new approaches to satisfy the market. However, these strategies are determined by macro-environment factors that dictate whether a defined initiative will succeed or fail. Currently, this is the predicament affecting SEAT, S.A, a Spanish automobile manufacturer opting to invest in its technology in developed cities. Settling on Manchester as the most preferred region, this essay will analyze SEAT’s new strategy in connecting with the apparent macro-environmental factors.
Analysts suggest that major OEMs have been reluctant to venture into the car-sharing game. Nevertheless, it has been concluded that within a short time these companies are moving towards a dominant position especially in big cities, and have confirmed to be the most innovative B2C operators (Tart, Wells & Beccaria, 2019). In the last few years, various companies have embedded this method in their operations intending to increase their marginal profits. For instance, GM merged all its existing sharing schemes to form Maven which focused on offering effective transportation to residents from specific apartments building in big cities. Ford also launched GoDrive, a single but inclusive transportation system that offered free membership to potential clients. Within 5 years, the platform became one of the largest car-sharing schemes in the world, largely supported by its commitment to becoming the most flexible, one-way sharing option.
There are a variety of reasons for this but the most crucial and painful cause is the reality that the global mobility market is advancing and if OEMs are to survive, they ought to adapt. The scuffle is no longer fought in the forecourt, but on telecommunication gadget, in the shared parking bay, as well as on price comparison websites. Car sharing consents OEMs to exploit the likelihood of their embedded telematics approaches and delivers an extra shop window whereby they can showcase their latest models (Tart, Wells & Beccaria, 2019). A significant number of OEMs have a wide range of models which allow them to dominate and capture the budget as well as the luxury market.
Regardless, it is evident that the car-sharing market will not follow the same trend as other forms of businesses where monopoly determines the type of product or service allocated to the masses. In addition to competing with each other, OEMs will certainly experience increasing contentions from peer-to-peer networks from new companies.
Aside from remodeling the wheel with the Cupra Formentor Concept crossover, SEAT has prepared a rather intriguing mobility proposition known as Minimo (Ciferri, 2019). Though the company envisioned the revelation of the new concept at the 2019 Geneva International Motor Show, it was initially introduced at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona a few days before the Geneva unveiling.
The Minimo is a small two-seat automobile that combines the features of superminis with the expediency of motorcycles. In terms of length, the automobile is 8.2 feet, which is similar to the first smart ForTwo. Unlike its predecessor, however, the Minimo’s width is 4 feet and has doors that open upwards to suit the in-town ambiance (Ciferri, 2019). The narrow and agile design of the vehicle makes it easier to navigate around big cities and the enclosed setting makes it safer to serve a wider number of the customer’s needs. The description resembles the Renault Twizy but the new Minimo does not have the same features as the electric quadricycle from Renault as it is filled with advanced technology which the SEAT management guarantees is the solution that many car-sharing firms have been anticipating.
Critics attest that the Minimo is not presentable for a significant number of customers who prefer cars according to their looks. Contrarily, the automobile may just be the right solution for car-sharing firms (Satara, 2019). According to the management of the company, Minimo’s design indicates how engineers understand the concept of mobility: high value as well as cost-saving, and efficiency combined with an excellent design. The Minimo shows that there is ample space for enjoyment and elegance when it comes to electric and shared vehicles.
Satisfying the needs of an urban setting means giving individuals the ability and freedom to travel around with zero limits. The SEAT Minimo offers its clients going over 100km of range a single charge. But due to its inventive design, there is no need to wait for the car to recharge once the energy from the batteries is depleted (Satara, 2019). Packaged under the floor of the automobile in an accessible structure, the battery can be swapped with a recharged pack within seconds and with minimal hustle allowing the vehicle to resume its journey much quicker than other automobiles on the road.
What’s more, an all-electric automobile with zero emissions suggests that entering cities with even the strictest emission legislations is not a problem (Ciferri, 2019). Adding to this, the ability to swap battery packs to quickly as well as efficiently refuel the car significantly reduces the charging time for private clients and operation costs of urban car-sharing services.
These qualities have made SEAT’s Minimo be a top contender for the most preferred electric automobile in urban areas and the management anticipates introducing this new concept in bigger towns (, 2019). Ostensibly, research indicates that the SEAT’s project would highly succeed if it was to be introduced in Manchester, United Kingdom, owing to the advantages brought by the region’s macro-environmental factors.
Satara Macro-Environmental Factors
The political landscape of the UK has for a long time been confined to the philosophy of its democracy. The nation’s steady governance system certifies that there is an outstanding constancy in policies. After the world wars, the country emerged as a key global power, largely backed by its economic development (The Global Competitiveness Report, 2019). With a stable political system, the country has been able to follow a democratic, parliamentary system of governance referred to as the Westminister which sensitizes the distribution of authority among its three arms of the government through checks and balances (The Global Competitiveness Report, 2019). According to the governance indicators of the World Bank, UK is one of the most prominent counties in terms of institutionalizing the rule of law, managing corruption, effective governing, regulating quality.
Other than an effective demographic setup, UK is considered to be having a strong position in global politics. In 2012, 4he country was ranked by the governance indicators as one of the few developed nations with effective governance scoring a whopping 92.42% (The Global Competitiveness Report, 2019). Through the years, the UK has been rebuilding itself into a prosperous as well as a modern State. Currently, it is a superpower in world politics on the account of being a permanent member of the G8, UN Security Council, and NATO. The country also has a significant influence on multinational institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Consecutive decades of compact economic progress, previously supported by the industrial division and currently propped by the service industry, have guaranteed its firm institutionalization as a global business hub as well as an economic power. Owing to the adherence to individual rights and fair tax policies SEAT could effectively flourish in this environment with minimal setbacks.
In addition, the rate of corruption in the UK, which is relatively low, favors the establishment of SEAT in terms of obtaining business permits with ease. According to the world index, The UK is ranked 11th out of 180 countries that are less corrupt. With less corruption, the level of bureaucracy is making the acquisition of business licenses and permits relatively easy. U.K’s political stability is currently facing terrorism threats since it actively participated in the Afghanistan war. An imminent attack would not only distort the country’s political stability but also economic stability since many people will migrate to peaceful regions leading to a reduction in the number of clients.
The United Kingdom is one of the most successful economies in the European Union and is one of the most robust in terms of social wellbeing as well as the standard of living. The country boasts of a high per capita GDP- 2.829 trillion USD (2019) as well as a favorable investment climate (The Global Competitiveness Report, 2019). According to the World Bank, the UK is ranked among the top ten best countries in the globe to establish a business, Furthermore, the nation ranks 1st in terms of getting credit, indicating that any firm wishing to invest in the UK market faces fewer challenges in terms of meeting, attaining working capital as well as long-term capital investments.
Another advantage is that the UK has an excellent environment for setting up businesses. The nation has an open and competitive economy to the point where International businesses consider the economic and political institutions favorable. The nation has a strong science base and flourishes on its high-tech manufacturing and producing capabilities in automobile, defense, and aerospace (The Global Competitiveness Report, 2019). The strength of the UK lies in the service industry sector such as banking, pharmaceuticals, and software. The country, viewed as the doorway to other countries in the EU, has an auspicious business environment concerning the availability of skilled labor. Located at the central time zone, the region is impeccably positioned between the east and the west, establishing a flexible regulatory environment for startup businesses and a leading global financial zone.
Owing to the economic advantages of the region, SEAT would easily flourish in this environment. This will highly be supported by the increase in consumer purchasing power. Over the last four years, there has been an increase in employment. With companies anticipating to employ qualified personnel, setting favorable earning becomes their bargaining chip. With rival companies also wanting to capitalize on the opportunities, they also increase their salaries. In the long run, employees are offered significant incentives allowing them to easily spend on consumer products. The open market indicates that SEAT’s strategy could easily and fairly compete with other businesses. Moreover, the UK has the capability of manufacturing automobiles, which will be beneficial for sourcing spare parts of the Minimo, thereby reducing costs.
The UK is one of the countries in the EU that has a high-quality educational system and has continuously attracted bright potential students from all over the world (The Global Competitiveness Report, 2019). The country’s tradition of establishing an efficient education system dates back to the early 18th century and has constantly been evolving. Qualifications affiliated with UK institutions are recommended respected and recognized worldwide. The nation has more than 170 universities as well as higher education institutes, in which three of its universities are ranked among the top 10 best universities in the world. This tradition has significantly contributed to the production of highly skilled labor. Employing professional labor will enable SEAT to increase production levels hence increasing its profits.
Other than having an apt education system, the UK also has one of the most successful healthcare systems. This has been propped by both the public and the private sectors. The government expenditure towards health services has traditionally been high in the UK hence helping the nation to maintain quality and efficiency (Deloitte Insights, 2020). Every UK resident, the European Economic Areas as well as nations that have bilateral healthcare settlements with the UK are entitled to NHS care. The availability of excellent healthcare systems assures the well-being of SEAT’s employees who will be fit to work at any given time.
SEAT’s innovations in the UK would bolster due to the country’s supportive social-cultural factors. The establishment of a quality education system will guarantee the production of a knowledgeable and skilled labor force who will be employed by SEAT to run its day-to-day operations (SEAT Minimó: A vision of the future of urban mobility (2019). Besides, the current demand for skilled labor is relatively high.
Regarding innovations, and R&D the UK is at the forefront of introducing new forms of technology that can be applied in different business sectors (The Global Competitiveness Report, 2019). Besides, the country has enacted laws concerning the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR). Though the country lacks a general statutory register of copyright, its Intellectual Property Office is responsible for keeping registers of designs, patents, and trademarks. The legislation regarding IORs is not only protected but also amended and enacted following industrial developments. Similarly, the country invests more than $65billion of its GDP to enhance the technological sector. With these policies, SEAT could safely introduce its new technology with the reassurance that no competitor will consider stealing their trademark or patents and that its employees will be up to the task.
Another technological factor that favors the establishment of new businesses is skilled personnel. The quality of education offered in research institutions has increased the number of skilled workers who can handle complex technical work. In connection to this, the country has experienced an increase in internet connection whereby private organizations and the government have set up effective broadband services to the people. This upsurge will benefit SEAT’s Minimo project since its operations solely rely on internet connections.
The current population of UK residents stands at 68 million which is equivalent to 0.87% of the total world population. Regarding transport mobility, 52% of the resident use private cars, 18% use public transport, 25% prefer walking and 5% opt for cycling. In retrospect, the age distribution in the UK also favors the establishment of new businesses. For instance, the age bracket of people between 19 and 60 years was averagely above 4 million. This data indicates that there is a huge gap to be filled in terms of providing effective mobility services. In connection to this SEAT’s innovation of intruding the Minimo would suffice since a large number of individuals still prefer using automobiles to access different parts of the country.
Ecological/Environmental Factors
The UK is one of the countries in the EU where the preservation of the flora and fauna is key. Besides, the nation has enacted several measures that guarantee the protection of the environment (Deloitte Insights, 2020). This is because the country generates approximately more than 127 billion pounds per year in tourism. Concerning SEAT, the introduction of Minimo would be highly recommended since the cars have zero emissions of greenhouse gasses.
In conclusion, establishing a sustainable mobility service in urban centers is vital but also challenging, owing to the different macro-environmental factors affecting a given region. As for SEAT, the introduction of Minimo in the UK would be a success since both the demographic, economic, political, socio-cultural, technological, and ecological factors support its establishment. As such, the company should consider investing their new ideas in Manchester, one of the biggest cities in the UK.
References
Ciferri, L. (2019). Seat challenges Renault Twizy with Minimo concept. Retrieved 3 February 2021, from https://europe.autonews.com/geneva-auto-show/seat-challenges-renault-twizy-minimo-concept
Deloitte Insights. (2020). Retrieved 3 February 2021, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/4331_Deloitte-City-Mobility-Index/Manchester_GlobalCityMobility_WEB.pdf
Satara, S. (2019). Retrieved 3 February 2021, from https://www.topspeed.com/cars/seat/2019-seat-minimo-concept-ar184691.html
SEAT Minimó: A vision of the future of urban mobility. (2019). Retrieved 3 February 2021, from https://www.seat-mediacenter.com/newspage/allnews/company/2019/SEAT-Minimo-A-vision-of-the-future-of-urban-mobility.html
Tart, S., Wells, P. & Beccaria, S. (2019). Analysis of Business Models for Car Sharing. Shared Mobility Opportunities and Challenges for European Cities project, EU
TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport (2019). Retrieved 3 February 2021, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
Related Samples
The Role of Essay Writing Services in Online Education: A Comprehensive Analysis
Introduction The...
Write Like a Pro: Effective Strategies for Top-Notch Explication Essays
Introduction "A poem...
How to Conquer Your Exams: Effective Study Strategies for All Learners
Introduction Imagine...
Overcoming Writer’s Block: Strategies to Get Your Essays Flowing
Introduction The...
Optimizing Your Online Learning Experience: Tips and Tricks for Success
The world of education...