QUESTION

 Evidence based in practice Continous Assignments  

Assessment Information                                  

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969

This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material

in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection

under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a

registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Assessment Information 3

Subject Code: HAT304

Subject Name: Emerging Issues in Hospitality and Tourism

Assessment Title:

Length:

Individual Proposal

1500 (+/- 10% allowable range)

Weighting: 40%

Total Marks:

Submission:

100

Online via Turnitin

Due Date: Week 13

.

Assessment Description

.

The purpose of this individual proposal is to develop students’ skills in examining contemporary

tourism and hospitality issues from legal and regulatory perspectives. This will enable students to

apply learned theories, concepts and tools in weeks 10 to 12 to a real-world case.

You are to choose a most recent disaster event or terrorism incident that has had a significant

impact on the Hospitality and Tourism Industry. Based on the current scholarly literature you are

to identify and examine the legal and regulatory factors that a tourism/hospitality governing body

must consider in the future to minimise/avoid such events or incidents from occurring.

You are then required to develop and propose a policy draft that you would recommend to the key

stakeholders of the Hospitality and Tourism Industry.

Your proposal MUST follow a professional structure:

Overview of the event/incident (250 words)

Recommended policy draft (1000 words):

Overview of the tourism and hospitality activity

Critical Analysis of Identified legal and regulatory concerns

Policy Objective/s

Stakeholders Involved

Validation Statement (250 words): Justification for your choice of the content covered in the

policy draft

Reference List (You must use Harvard Referencing Style)

You are required to reference at least 12 sources of information. These may include corporate

websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper

articles.

Assessment Information

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969

This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material

in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection

under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a

registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Assignment Submission

This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ or ‘PDF’ document to avoid any technical issues that may

occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a

legitimate submission. Turnitin will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this

case, you must contact your lecturer via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a

screenshot of the Turnitin error message.

You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible

delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties that may occur.

Late assignment submission penalties

Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business

School “late assignment submission penalties” policy.

Number of

days

Penalty

1* – 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks

available

10 – 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available.

After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the

due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero

for the assignment(s).

Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given

a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been

returned to students

*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be

considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty

For more information, please read the full policy via

https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/KBS_FORM_Assessment-

Policy_MAR2018_FA.pdf

Assessment Information

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969

This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material

in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection

under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a

registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Important Study Information

Academic Integrity Policy

KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of

cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct

Policy.

For details on academic integrity policies and penalties, the reassessment process, and the

appeals process, please refer to http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.

Word Limits for Written Assessments

Submissions that exceed the word count by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the

point at which that limit is exceeded.

Study Assistance

Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Success Centre representative

or refer to the study help on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. You can find this by

clicking on the top page toolbar:

My Services>Academic Success Centre>Study Support Resources

.

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969

This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further

reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86

098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

HAT304 Assessment Marking Rubric – Individual Proposal 40%

Marking

Criteria

NN (Fail)

0-49%

P (Pass)

50-64%

CR (Credit)

65-74%

DN (Distinction)

75-84%

HD (High Distinction)

85-100%

Critical

Analysis

/40 marks

Your analysis does not

satisfactorily identify and/or

examines the legal and

regulatory issues

associated with the chosen

event/incident.

Your analysis partially

identifies and examines

the legal and regulatory

issues associated with the

chosen event/incident.

Your analysis satisfactorily

identifies and examines the

legal and regulatory issues

associated with the chosen

event/incident.

Your analysis strongly

identifies and examines the

legal and regulatory issues

associated with the chosen

event/incident.

Your analysis critically

identifies and thoroughly

examines legal and

regulatory issues

associated with the chosen

event/incident.

Critical

Evaluation

/30 marks

Your evaluation has no or

unsuitable justification.

Limited evaluation that

somewhat justifies your

choice of policy content.

Sufficient evaluation that

justifies your choice of

policy content.

Proficient evaluation that

substantially justifies your

choice of policy content.

An excellent evaluation that

rigorously justifies your

choice of policy content.

Format

/30 marks

Total Marks

/100

Spelling and/or grammar is

consistently incorrect,

impacting on the flow and

readability of your analysis.

The format chosen for your

report lacks thought and

consideration for the

intended audience.

In-text referencing and/or

reference list is mostly

incorrect or non-existent.

Mostly correct grammar

and spelling used

throughout, with consistent

minor and/or major errors.

The format chosen for your

report is appropriate, but

major improvements would

enhance its presentation.

In-text referencing and the

resultant reference list

adheres to Kaplan Harvard

Referencing Style, with

major errors.

Mostly correct grammar

and spelling used

throughout, with occasional

minor and/or major

error(s).

The format chosen for your

report is appropriate, but

some improvements would

enhance its presentation.

In-text referencing and the

resultant reference list

adheres to Kaplan Harvard

Referencing Style, with

minor errors throughout

and the occasional major

error.

Correct grammar and

spelling throughout the

analysis, with the occasional

minor error.

Your report is professionally

presented and have been

submitted in an appropriate

format.

In-text referencing and the

resultant reference list

adheres to Kaplan Harvard

Referencing Style, with only

the occasional minor error.

Correct grammar and

spelling throughout the

analysis with no errors.

Your report is professionally

presented and have been

submitted in an entirely

appropriate format.

In-text referencing and the

resultant reference list

adheres to Kaplan Harvard

Referencing Style, with no

errors.

Feedback and Grades will be released via Turnitin

Related Samples