{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
  • QUESTION

    case 6: Pricing Vehicle Emission and Congestion on an Urban Road Network using a Dynamic Traffic Simulator.    

    case 6: Pricing Vehicle Emission and Congestion on an Urban Road Network using a Dynamic Traffic Simulator.

    PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CASE IS IN FILE “case bank”!

    Think about Abstract, strengths, opportunity or weakness and what you learn about the case, there are some questions be listed as below. Thinks about them and select 2 to 3 questions to answer for each part. (you do not need to answer all of them)

    Abstract

    An abstract is an encapsulation of the paper:

    • What is the paper about (scope)?
    • Did they identify a problem (economic, logistical, etc.)
    • What did the author(s) want to do (objectives)?
    • How did they go about doing it (methodology)?
    • What evidence did they use in the analysis?
    • What did they find (conclusion)?

    Paper’s Strengths
    Here are some questions you can consider as you prepare the critique of the paper:

    1. Is the article well written and easily understood with clear objectives and reasonable conclusions?
    2. Does the author(s) address a tangible problem in society and provide an insightful discussion?
    3. Does the author(s) present convincing data and other evidence to support their position?
    4. Is the methodology technically sound and appropriate for the data collected?
    5. Does the author(s) make a useful contribution to the knowledge of transportation and could it have long term value?
    6. Does the author(s) make good use of the diagrams, figures or data to support their arguments? Are any missing, that should be there?
    7. Do the conclusions flow from the material presented in the paper?
    8. How could the paper be made even stronger?

    Opportunities for Improvement

    Weaknesses
    Here are some questions you can consider as you prepare the critique of the paper:

    1. Is the article well written and easily understood with clear objectives and reasonable conclusions?
    2. Does the author(s) address a tangible problem in society and provide an insightful discussion?
    3. Does the author(s) present convincing data and other evidence to support their position?
    4. Is the methodology technically sound and appropriate for the data collected?
    5. Does the author(s) make a useful contribution to the knowledge of transportation and could it have long term value?
    6. Does the author(s) make good use of the diagrams, figures or data to support their arguments? Are any missing, that should be there?
    7. Do the conclusions flow from the material presented in the paper?
    8. How would you recommend that the author(s) could improve the paper?

    Which Implicit Economic Model?
    Cartel model, explain why, given the examples in the case

    What did you learn?

    This is your opportunity to assess the intrinsic value of the paper from your own perspective.

    What surprised you most?
    Did anything challenge your prior impressions?
    Did you learn anything about organizing a paper, or what to avoid?
    Are you convinced by the analysis, or skeptical of its validity?

    Grade for this paper?

]

Subject Article Analysis Pages 5 Style APA

Answer

Article Critique: Pricing Vehicle Emissions and Congestion on an Urban Road Network using Dynamic Traffic Simulator

Abstract        

In their insightful piece, Vosough, de Palma, and Lindsey (2020) contribute to the ongoing efforts geared towards the reduction of congestion and air pollution in urban centers by proposing a simulation model, which should be applied during the architectural phase to ensure that road users part with convenient amounts of money as a reimbursement for the emissions from their vehicles. These authors believe that the METROPOLIS framework can go a long way in reducing unwarranted traffic by charging road users (drivers) based on the time spent on traffic. This model is grounded on the belief that at least 1,536 points of pollutants such as CO, PM2.5, CO2, and NOX are emitted every 500 meters. For this reason, they suggest installation of polls at such intervals to price road users for the same.

Paper’s Strengths

The most valuable aspect of this piece is its reliance on a proved architectural model for public roads. The METROPOLIS framework takes various factors into account, including the time spent by travelers on road as well as the costs of transit. It offers an opportunity to design transport networks that reduce both time and money spent on trips while still charging the users on the basis of congestion and emission. The need for this model is further affirmed by the use of statistical data showing high health costs when the intervention is not applied.

Opportunities for Improvement

As much as the authors rely on a valuable tool to recommend transformative change in the road transport systems, they do not break down the information effectively. Such a bold declaration is inspired by the belief that this piece is written for policymakers and lobbyists, yet it is not easy to decipher. Perhaps, further explanation of the METROPOLITAN model can help enhance its value to a broader audience.

Lesson Learnt

When reading through this paper, I learnt that the value of information is largely attributable to its presentation. Even though this piece offers crucial information, excessive technicalities make it impossible for the most valuable audience (includes lobbyists and policymakers) from grasping its recommendations. On this note, I believe that too much jargon is useless for papers meant to influence public decision.

Grade

            Fairly stating, this article deserves a flat 80 percent mark (Grade B) since it offers relevant and credible information based on a proved theoretical framework. The 20 percent deduction is attributed to the unwarranted technicality in its presentation considering its target audience.

.

References

 

  • Vosough, S., de Palma, A., & Lindsey, R. (2020). Pricing Vehicle Emissions and Congestion on an Urban Road Network using Dynamic Traffic Simulator. Canadian Transportation Research Forum.

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?