{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

QUESTION

Week 8- Cyber security

Answer (a), (b), and (c).

(a). Do you believe Elonis was rightly decided? (and see the notes and questions following the case). Briefly describe the elements of the offense, and the precise issue, and then give concise reasons to support your answer. Can you think of a way to frame a law to cover the conduct discussed in that case or the activities described in the notes? If any one of the notes catches your interest, briefly explain your thoughts or reflections.

(b). Do you believe Carmichael was rightly decided? (, and see the notes and questions following the case). Briefly describe the elements of the offense, and then give concise reasons to support your answer. Can you think of a way to frame a law to cover the conduct discussed in that case or the activities described in the notes? If any one of the notes catches your interest, briefly explain your thoughts or reflections.

(c) Do you believe Van Buren (, and see the notes and questions following the case) was rightly decided under existing law? Do you believe the existing law is correct? Can you think of another offense that could have been charged? Can you think of a way more narrowly to design the statute?

Or, more generally do you believe that threats, bullying, and general rudeness (including “revenge porn”) in cyberspace is more or less dangerous than in ordinary space? Do you believe it is more or less desirable to regulate such activity in cyberspace compared to ordinary space? Do you believe the law, including interpretations of the First Amendment, is adequate in response to threats in cyberspace?

Source – The “Casebook”: ORIN KERR, COMPUTER CRIME LAW, West (fourth edition, 2018)
see attachment

 

 

 

Subject Computer Science Pages 4 Style APA

Answer

Question & Answer: Cyber Security

(a). Do you believe Elonis was rightly decided?

            Elonis underwent conviction under a significant federal law whose responsibility is to make the ideal crime communicate, any threat against another person (Kerr, 2018). According to, Sarker et al., (2020), Elonis was sentenced to 44 months. According to the Supreme Court this was a true threat hence cannot be protected by the initial amendment.

Briefly describe the elements of the offense, and the precise issue, and then give concise reasons to support your answer.

An investigative brief is a composed lawful contention introduced to a redrafting court. Its motivation is to convince the higher court to maintain or switch the preliminary court’s choice. Briefs of this sort are hence equipped to introducing the issues engaged with the case from the point of view of one side as it were (Kerr, 2018). Redrafting briefs from the two sides can be truly significant to anybody surveying the legitimate issues brought up for a situation.

Can you think of a way to frame a law to cover the conduct discussed in that case or describe in notes?

Tragically, they are once in a while distributed. The U.S. High Court is the lone court for which briefs are routinely accessible in distributed structure. The Landmark Briefs arrangement (REF. LAW KF 101.9 .K8) incorporates the full messages of briefs identifying with a not very many of the numerous cases heard by this court (Corallo, Lazoi, & Lezzi, 2020 ). Likewise, rundowns of the briefs recorded for the offended party or respondent for all cases revealed are remembered for the U.S

 

 

(b) Do you believe Carmichael was rightly decided. Briefly describe the elements of the offense, and then give concise reasons to support your answer. Think of a way frame a law to cover the conduct discussed.

Presently the facts confirm that both knowing some legitimate principles and securing the abilities of lawyering are essential to achievement in the act of law. Also, it is additionally obvious that a portion of this information is helpfully acquired in law school. Be that as it may, what truly recognizes legal advisors from different kinds of society, so it is said, is dominance of a variety of gifts in contention and decision making that is regularly on the whole portrayed as legitimate thinking (Kerr, 2018). So even despite the fact that graduate schools do show some legitimate principles and some down to earth proficient abilities, the graduate schools additionally keep up that their most significant mission is to prepare understudies in expressions of the human experience of lawful contention, lawful decision making, and lawful thinking—in reasoning like a legal advisor.

(C) Do you believe van buren was rightly decided under existing law ? Do you believe the existing law is correct?. Can you think of another offense that could have been changed?

This monetary emergency would get known as the Panic of 1837. Numerous Americans went jobless and others started to go hungry (Kerr, 2018). Van Buren reacted by following a strategy reliable with his Jacksonian confidence in the restricted forces of the government and a doubt of paper cash and simple credit. Martin Van Buren was the eighth President of the United States (1837-1841), subsequent to filling in as the eighth Vice President and the 10th Secretary of State, both under President Andrew Jackson.

James Vorenberg first reviewed a portion of the difficulties experienced by the Commission. Head legal officer Nicholas Katzenbach needed him to persuade FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover of the investigation’s significance, yet Mr. Vorenberg was always unable to orchestrate a meeting with Mr. Hoover (Kerr, 2018). What’s more, after the investigation was finished, it “nearly didn’t come around.” Mr. Vorenberg was disclosed to President Johnson not, at this point needed the report since he had heard it suggested wiretapping. Mr. Vorenberg “took steps to toss it over the White House back fence”; yet eventually, the report was acknowledged and the President was very satisfied with it.

 

This question has been answered

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference

Corallo, A., Lazoi, M., & Lezzi, M. (2020). Cybersecurity in the context of industry 4.0: A structured classification of critical assets and business impacts. Computers in Industry114, 103165. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.103165

Kerr, O. S. (2018). Computer Crime Law (Introduction). Computer Crime Law (4th Ed. 2018), West Academic Publishing.

Sarker, I. H., Kayes, A. S., Badsha, S., Alqahtani, H., Watters, P., & Ng, A. (2020). Cybersecurity data science: An overview from machine learning perspective. Journal of Big Data7(1). doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00318-5

 

 

 

 

 

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?