QUESTION
week 7 discussion 507
In a discussion post that is between 300-500 words, respond to this week’s discussion prompt:
Slaughter and Ramo both see network power as central to achieving positive outcomes in the globalized world, but these two authors suggest vastly different strategic approaches. Which one is likely to achieve the better outcome and why? (Please be sure to avoid ambiguity by addressing distinct differences in the arguments of each author.)
Subject | Technology | Pages | 34 | Style | APA |
---|
Answer
Network Power
Today, everything in the world is connected: war, media, diplomacy, society, business, and even religion. For example, war is connected so that a nation cannot fight and defeat terrorists without small groups of different stakeholders being networked to one another and to support. Also, we see connections in diplomacy matters as controlling crises depend on bringing international networks to work together, so are business, society, and religion. Ann Marie Slaughter and Joshua Cooper Ramo both see networks’ power to be the key to attaining constructive results in the rapidly changing world. Although the authors propose network power to be central to attaining positive results globally, Slaughter’s strategic approaches hold an upper hand in achieving the best results.
Slaughter approaches the United States’ networks to be established in its geography, demography, and culture. As compared to China and India, the US has a tiny population, making it easier for her to advance in technologies. Geographically, the US is strategically positioned in the Atlantic hemisphere, an area with Europe, the US, and Africa. The countries in this hemisphere are peaceful, economically diversified, and stable. These characteristics are a great edge for growing economically by connecting the world’s creative men.
In history, the greatness of a nation is seen through its population. The population is identified as the main factor behind economic stability and military power. China, India, Europe, or Japan is more populated than the US; therefore, they are disadvantaged due to the territories they have to cover to defeat their rivals during the war and the economy to supply a stable military. Small countries could expand their territories through colonization in the nineteenth century. The visible migration of youths and children worldwide to the US should be used as an asset. These young people seen acquiring US citizenship will lead to increased population in the middle age group; thus, promotion in the production sector in the US will be evidenced. Hence, the US should use this phenomenon to formulate conditions to enable its profit.
The culture of creation seen in the U.S makes it the world’s leader in technological innovations. Slaughter suggests that government agencies, corporations, and civic bodies should operate to collect innovative ideas across the world to spearhead technological innovations. This will foster networking worldwide to collaborate and produce the best innovations. Slaughter states that a nation’s economic future depends on maintenance and nurturing innovations.
In conclusion, Slaughter’s approaches to a network power mainly look into the demography, geography, and a nation’s culture in preserving and nurturing innovations. Having the right networks corresponds to the superiority of a state. HENCE, the U.S uses its network, such as its geography and culture, to aid its economic and military stabilities, hence, defining its superiority.
References
Related Samples
The Role of Essay Writing Services in Online Education: A Comprehensive Analysis
Introduction The...
Write Like a Pro: Effective Strategies for Top-Notch Explication Essays
Introduction "A poem...
How to Conquer Your Exams: Effective Study Strategies for All Learners
Introduction Imagine...
Overcoming Writer’s Block: Strategies to Get Your Essays Flowing
Introduction The...
Optimizing Your Online Learning Experience: Tips and Tricks for Success
The world of education...