{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Construct a discussion that identifies how you feel the learning objectives were met supported with examples of course materials and course assignments.

For any course objectives, you feel were not met during the course please provide a discussion as to why it was not met.

Here are the course learning objectives for your review:
Construct a consistent approach to the evaluation and management of mental health disorders and conditions for adult/geriatric clients and clients across the lifespan presenting in the acute and/or primary care setting.

Design age-appropriate mental health and physical health maintenance screening plans for adult/geriatric clients and clients across the lifespan for psychiatric mental health disorders.

Provide evidence (citations and references) to support your statements and opinions.

 

Sample Solution

 

a. Establish a trusting relationship with the client by actively listening and providing adequate information to ensure informed consent.
b. Gather comprehensive biopsychosocial history, including mental health history, physical health status, family dynamic, social supports/environmental stressors, past treatments and medication use/side effects.
c. Assess for current symptoms of distress using standardized measures such as PHQ-9 or Beck Depression Inventory (for depression), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (for anxiety), Mini Mental Status Exam (for cognition) etc., as well as any associated risk factors or complications that may arise from mental health disorder(s).

Sample Solution

 

a. Establish a trusting relationship with the client by actively listening and providing adequate information to ensure informed consent.
b. Gather comprehensive biopsychosocial history, including mental health history, physical health status, family dynamic, social supports/environmental stressors, past treatments and medication use/side effects.
c. Assess for current symptoms of distress using standardized measures such as PHQ-9 or Beck Depression Inventory (for depression), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (for anxiety), Mini Mental Status Exam (for cognition) etc., as well as any associated risk factors or complications that may arise from mental health disorder(s).

n this experiment, small and large lima beans were used to test whether or not bean beetles had a preferred site size for oviposition. Our hypothesis proposed that if a preference was shown, a greater number of eggs would be oviposited on the larger lima beans compared to small lima beans. We predicted that they would prefer the larger bean because it has a greater surface area, therefore finding a spot on the bean to oviposit would be easier to do. On the contrary, our results show that we reject the null hypothesis due to the fact that our p-value was so extremely small. Because of this, we can conclude that C. maculatus prefer smaller sized lima beans for oviposition. The preference for a smaller lima bean could be due to a chemical cue preferred by, or undesirable to, bean beetles. Another reason could be that the nutrient to surface area ratio is greater, or because larger beans may be more appealing to predators. According to a similar experiment conducted by Jason Cope and Charles Fox, bean beetle eggs were distributed so that resources were maximized per individual offspring (2002). They found that females preferred a larger mass compared to surface area due to the quantity of resources available inside the seed. Although our experiments measured different variables, in both findings we can identify that a larger surface area is not ideal for bean beetle site preference for oviposition.

In an experiment conducted by Grace Pitman, Tyler Flockhart, and Ryan Norris, they measured which size and what density of a milkweed patch was preferred by the monarch butterfly for oviposition (2018). Their results showed that a small, low-density patch had the highest egg density. This was because larger patches showed an increase in predator abundance (Flockhart et al. 2018). When determining sites for oviposition, the one that increases probability of offspring survival is more desirable. Therefore, choosing a small, low-density site for oviposition increased the probability that the offspring would survive and reproduce. This relates to our experiment because we tested to find the preferred site that would increase survival in b

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?