-
QUESTION
Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography (50 points) (1500 words)
This week you will choose six (6) or more articles for your final presentation. My final presentation is Electronic Health Record/Point-of-Care Technology
Then you will write an annotated bibliography of the six or more articles you have chosen for your final presentation, using APA format. Use the attached document for guidelines on how to compose an annotated bibliography.
Creating Annotated Bibliographies.docx
Instructions
*Rich in content *Full of thought, insight, and analysis
Stylistics
Exceeds Expectations
*No grammatical or stylistic errors, * No APA format errors.
Creating Annotated Bibliographies
Based on APA Style
Annotated bibliographies are not specifically addressed in the Publication Manual of the
American Psychological Association (APA) (6th ed.). The following is an example given online at the OWL at Purdue as the basis for formatting.
Contents
- Guidelines
- Sample Annotated Bibliography
- Standard Reference List/Bibliography
Guidelines
The following is a summary of things to know when creating an annotated bibliography based
on APA Style:
- The annotated bibliography consists of two elements
- Citation in current APA style format
- Annotation
- The annotation will follow the citation on the next line. There is not an extra space—double spacing is used throughout.
- An annotation is different from an abstract. It should have several sentences summarizing the main points or ideas found in the item. It should then include your own statement evaluating the quality of the item and/or relating the item to your own research topic.
- For a longer annotated bibliography, it is appropriate to divide into sections or topics, and to title those sections as seems fitting.
NOTE: These annotations are for illustrative purposes only and have no relationship to the content of the sources.
Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL). (n.d.). Annotated bibliography samples. Retrieved from
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/
Sample Annotated Bibliography
AICPA sets ethical standards for outsourcing. (2005). Journal of Accountancy, 199(1), 8.
Retrieved from http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/
This article presents the new standards for outsourcing developed by the AICPA ethics
committee. The standards are summarized, and a brief discussion is included of the
implications going forward for business and international trade. The authors indicate that
changes to the business community will be relatively minor. This is a helpful source for
getting an overview of the current ethics standards in outsourcing.
American Management Association. (2010). The AMA handbook of business writing.
New York, NY: Author.
The American Management Association has created its own guide for business writing.
Designed as a supplemental text to more thorough style guides such as APA, this guide
covers topics relating specifically to business, such as citing financials, formatting of
company reports, and professional approaches to information integrity in the workplace.
This is an indispensable work for anyone doing professional business writing.
Barthelemy, J., & Geyer, D. (2005). An empirical investigation of IT outsourcing versus
outsourcing in France and Germany. Information & Management, 42, 533-542.
doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.02.005
The authors present an investigation of IT outsourcing based on the combined results of a
survey administered to IT firms as well as statistical measures from domestic and French
or German firms. Their data covers a wide range of IT business unit types. However, the
lack of longitudinal data weakens their conclusion that the slower pace of French and
German IT outsourcing has had a long-term positive effect on business in those countries.
Standard Reference List / Bibliography
Here’s the same sources, but formatted as a standard bibliography for comparison.
References
AICPA sets ethical standards for outsourcing. (2005). Journal of Accountancy, 199(1), 8.
Retrieved from http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/
American Management Association. (2010). The AMA handbook of business writing.
New York, NY: Author.
Barthelemy, J., & Geyer, D. (2005). An empirical investigation of IT outsourcing versus
outsourcing in France and Germany. Information & Management, 42, 533-542.
doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.02.005
| Subject | Nursing | Pages | 9 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
-
-
Annotated Bibliography on Electronic Health Record/Point-Of-Care Technology
Cifuentes, Davis, Fernald, Gunn, R., Dickinson, & Cohen, (2015 Electronic health record challenges, workarounds, and solutions observed in practices integrating behavioral health and primary care. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 28(Supplement 1), S63-S72. Retrieved from https://www.jabfm.org/content/28/Supplement_1/S63.short
In this journal, the financial and non-financial costs related to implementing electronic health records, especially in primary care practices, are discussed. Therefore, the editorial reports the value of implementing a health system that is electronic in approximately twenty-six care practices in a physician network, based in North Texas. The article also considers the hardware and the software costs, together with the effort and time invested in the implementation of EHS.
Therefore, this expose is essential for the research since it will help ensure that the best cost-effective EHS implementation method is adopted. Besides, from the paper, critical conclusions are discussed to ensure that countries get advised on the best EHS implementation techniques based on their population and economic requirements.
Hicks, Stowe, Willner, Wai, Daly, Gordon, & Moss, (2016). Implementation of clinical pharmacogenomics within a large health system: from electronic health record decision support to consultation services. Pharmacotherapy: 36(8), 940-948.Retrieved from https://accpjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/phar.1786
The article by Hicks and co-authors aims to identify the critical adoption factors for EHS by health professionals and utilize them as a steer, which can automatically support their adoption process. From the article, the health care sector is a primary social and economic concern for most world countries. For this reason, most states have made a lot of effort to utilize Electronic Health System. However, there is evidence that shows that the EHS has not been adopted effectively in most of these countries, as it gets expected. The limited adoption is despite numerous proposals that have to get put forward to support its adoption.
Based on PRISMA statements, this research, therefore, presents a systematic literature review. The frequent literature review majors on electronic databases with adoption studies based on electronic health records. The authors highlight six best workable adoption factors from the literature review: workflow impact, expert support, communication among users, and many more. Therefore, the article is essential since it will help the researchers arrive at the three best workable adoption factors.
Huber, Highland, Krishnamoorthi, & Tang, (2018) Utilizing the electronic health record to improve advance care planning: a systematic review. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 35(3), 532-541. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1049909117715217
This is a qualitative study that was conducted to value the benefits and clarify the limitations of Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. The research is led by tech-survey physicians who assume that public resistance and expenses are not an issue for consideration in EHR implementation. According to Huber et al. (2018), the slow implementation of EHS in most cases has been connected to physician resistance to change at the expense of EHR adoption. Besides, article explains how the implantation and use of EHR is independent of money. According to the authors, there are numerous other factors, rather than money, that have to be incorporated to ensure successful implementation of EHS is achieved.
Huber et al. (2018) have analyzed two EHS systems: the Veteran's administration using a computerized patient record and the General Electric Centricity Enterprise system utilized at the academic medical center. The authors indicate that the difficulties that arise from accepting a physician mirror the same concerns about the impacts of EHS on patient care. This is because most physicians are optimistic concerning the benefits that the EHS system might have in the future. However, the doctors are tired of the non-initiatives and the complex data searches that involve a lack of EHS. Therefore, this source is beneficial for the research in making comparisons between the speculated importance of EHS and working without EHS in medical setups.
Kruse, Kristof, Jones, Mitchell, & Martinez, (2016) Barriers to electronic health record adoption: a systematic literature review. Journal of medical systems, 40(12), 252. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10916-016-0628-9
In their article, Kruse et al. (2016) describe some of the considerations and challenges of implementing the EHS system. The article highlights the requirements needed to ensure the privacy of patients is upheld and to form a team for monitoring the health system to oversee the implementation process. The article also incorporates analytics that is predictive of the medical education and ensuring that the electronic systems do not displace or crowd out the decision-making by health professionals and patients.
The discussion in the article is not comprehensive and aims to stress specific obstacles to introduce the requirement for considerate sets of excellent practices to the rise of EHS. The work of these authors is hence not conclusive. For this reason, this article is very crucial for the research since, from it, the best considerations involving the implementation of EHS will be obtained. Besides, from the report, the best procedures for EHS implementation will be drawn.
Lin, Y. K., Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Do electronic health records affect quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 306-318.Retrived from https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.2018.0813
In this article, Lin et al. (2019) assess the potential benefits of EHS that comprise clinical services, organizational outcomes, and social outcomes. Besides the associated benefits, the report also highlights the drawbacks linked to EHS such as high upfront accusation cost, on progress costs of maintenance, and the workflow disruptions, which lead to temporary productivity as a result of comprehending a new system. Besides, the article investigates the potential privacy concerns involving patients. The problems have been discussed legislatively, considering the HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health) Act.
This article is essential for the research since it discusses the numerous merits and demerits linked to EHS adoption. Since most benefits accrue to patients and society at large, important conclusions will be made on the possible ways to mitigate the disadvantages that may be related to the implementation of the system. Besides, from the article, the research will draw appropriate principles from health and information technology for economic and clinical Act that when best applied in EHS system process, both patients and health professionals are able to acknowledge the advantages.
Sittig, Wright, Ash, & Singh, (2016New unintended adverse consequences of electronic health records. Yearbook of medical informatics, (1), 7. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5171566/
According to Sitting and co-authors, upon successful incorporation of EHS system, all health challenges regarding data will be solved. However, this article identifies many unintended and unfavorable penalties of electronic health records that should be examined through an in-depth analysis. Therefore, researchers need to perform a cost analysis to weigh the system's strengths and weaknesses before its incorporation.
The article also highlights the various Unified Access Controls (UACs) that have changed in the health sector about technology. Since the identified UACs poses a significant challenge to EHS developers and users alike, the article proposes meaningful ways of mitigating the challenges to ensure EHS success. Therefore, this article is crucial for the research since it will help in getting an overview of the unexpected consequences that implementing electronic health records might have. Besides, after the products have been identified, the research will develop tangible ways of mitigating the effects.
Yang, Bass, Bowles, & Sockolow, (2019) Impact of Home Care Admission Nurses' Goals on Electronic Health Record Documentation Strategies at the Point of Care. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(1), 39. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343953/
According to this article, most EHS intended to improve clinical health processes are undervalued in most homes. For this reason, Yang et al. (2019) assessed clinician satisfaction, informed by the rapid patient outcomes and workflow to identify EHS obtainable options. The article is based on a study set in the Philadelphia agency with approximately 142 health professionals. The identified challenges, for instance, include inadequate training, lack of field support coupled with hardware problems, and insufficient training.
Yang and co-authors also highlight the various opportunities available for improved adoption, including sharing the information with front-line clinicians on data involving patient care and data timelines. For this reason, this article is a beneficial resource for anyone who would like to evaluate the value of EHS in most homes. Besides, the article is essential since it highlights the different definitions of EHS as portrayed by most current scholars.
-
References
Cifuentes, M., Davis, M., Fernald, D., Gunn, R., Dickinson, P., & Cohen, D. J. (2015). Electronic health record challenges, workarounds, and solutions observed in practices integrating behavioral health and primary care. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 28(Supplement 1), S63-S72.
Hicks, J. K., Stowe, D., Willner, M. A., Wai, M., Daly, T., Gordon, S. M., ... & Moss, T. (2016). Implementation of clinical pharmacogenomics within a large health system: from electronic health record decision support to consultation services. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 36(8), 940-948.
Huber, M. T., Highland, J. D., Krishnamoorthi, V. R., & Tang, J. W. Y. (2018). Utilizing the electronic health record to improve advance care planning: a systematic review. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 35(3), 532-541.
Kruse, C. S., Kristof, C., Jones, B., Mitchell, E., & Martinez, A. (2016). Barriers to electronic health record adoption: a systematic literature review. Journal of medical systems, 40(12), 252.
Lin, Y. K., Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Do electronic health records affect quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 306-318.
Sittig, D. F., Wright, A., Ash, J., & Singh, H. (2016). New unintended adverse consequences of electronic health records. Yearbook of medical informatics, (1), 7.
Yang, Y., Bass, E. J., Bowles, K. H., & Sockolow, P. S. (2019). Impact of Home Care Admission Nurses' Goals on Electronic Health Record Documentation Strategies at the Point of Care. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(1), 39.