Read and/or listen to the following article (also posted in Canvas):
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/07/can-an-unloved-child-learn-to-love/612253/
Taking into consideration Izidor’s background and his behavior manifestations, address the following questions. Be sure to number each response (1-6).
- Based on APA 3 criteria for defining and diagnosing abnormal behavior, has Izidor shown evidence of abnormal behavior? Addressing each of the 3 criteria, what evidence do you have that is sufficient for these requirements? Use the article to incorporate text evidence, however, you do not have to include formal citations.
- Based on text evidence, do you believe he meets the DSM-5 criteria for attachment disorder? Provide examples. DSM-5: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537155/
- Would you consider his prognosis good or guarded? Why?
- How might both heritability and environmentality come into play when considering Izidor’s unique responses to his environment?
- Discuss how reaction range may also affect his responses.
- Select a scenario of maladaptive behavior from Izidor. Address the ABC’s of the particular behavior. If no consequences are listed, simply state that.
On the other side of the aisle, there are a handful of disadvantages associated with the relationship of open-list PR. In traditional PR, party leaders would have the power to allocate seats to their parties candidates as they deem appropriate, taking away political influence from citizens. Candidates in both systems have incentives to garner political party support as it allocates more party power within the upper and lower chambers of the legislature. However, since candidates have more personal power in making a name for themselves without necessarily following party principles, this can lead to a weakening of political parties. Lack of faith in political parties leads to what is known as floor crossing, political figures would change party affiliation, “in an attempt to jockey for the best positions for future elections,” (Dickovick/Eastwood, 409). Only causing faith in open-list PR to further disintegrate, political leaders would offer bribes to legislators to maintain a majority vote on specific pieces of legislation. Also, due to legislators loyalty to their federal states, they do not always have Brazil’s interests in mind when enacting legislation, as only the members of their respective state ensure re-election. What’s more, Brazil contains a multi-party, fragmented party, system where “voters may face as many as one thousand candidates in a single district… [caused by] high-magnitude legislative districts, low costs for candidates’ entry, and high thresholds for the number of candidates per party list,” (Aguilar/Barone/Cunow/Desposato, 181). Withal, the disadvantages of open-list PR in Brazil have led citizens to lose trust in their government, such as the impeachment of Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff in August 2016.
Altogether, the interesting question arises of how an open-list PR system would affect a less fragmented, strong party alliance system in a democracy such as the United States. The transition from a strict first-past-the-post system, which has been the building blocks for American society for 250 years, would certainly cause an uproar from conservatives and libertarians alike. While it would have little to no effect on the Senate retaining two seats per state, the institution of voting proportionment would likely result in smaller parties becoming more prevalent in the House of Representatives. Potential effects of such an institutional