{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
        1. QUESTION

        Discussion: Categorical Data Analysis
        As with the previous week’s Discussion, this Discussion assists in solidifying your understanding of statistical testing by engaging in some data analysis. This week you will once again work with a real, secondary dataset to construct a research question, perform categorical data analysis that answers the question, and interpret the results.
        Whether in a scholarly or practitioner setting, good research and data analysis should have the benefit of peer feedback. For this Discussion, you will post your response to the hypothesis test, along with the results. Be sure and remember that the goal is to obtain constructive feedback to improve the research and its interpretation, so please view this as an opportunity to learn from one another.
        To prepare for this Discussion:
        • Review Chapters 10 and 11 of the Frankfort-Nachmias & Leon-Guerrero course text and the media program found in this week’s Learning Resources related to bivariate categorical tests.
        • Create a research question using the General Social Survey dataset that can be answered using categorical analysis.
        By Day 3
        Use SPSS to answer the research question. Post your response to the following:
        1. What is your research question?
        2. What is the null hypothesis for your question?
        3. What research design would align with this question?
        4. What dependent variable was used and how is it measured?
        5. What independent variable is used and how is it measured?
        6. If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect?
        7. Explain your results for a lay audience and further explain what the answer is to your research question.
        Be sure to support your Main Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

        Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Leon-Guerrero, A. (2018). Social statistics for a diverse society (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
        • Chapter 9, “Bivariate Tables” (pp. 235-268)
        • Chapter 11, “The Chi-Square Test and Measures of Association” (pp. 269-302)

 

Subject Psychology Pages 5 Style APA

Answer

Categorical Data Analysis: Chi-Square Test of Association

Categorical data are recorded counts of observations that fall into any particular bin or hole, rather than quality of the observations themselves. Categorical data are either measured at the Ordinal level (categories with some inherent order) or nominal scale (categories with no particular order). Therefore, categorical data analysis focuses on the bins rather than the observations themselves, an examination of the collection of observations. Therefore, among the assumptions anchoring this mode of analysis include levels of measure (either nominal or ordinal), data consists of two or more independent categories, and categories are partitions (the pigeons/holes in which observations are placed are mutually exclusive and exhaustive) (Frankfort-Nachmias & Leon-Guerrero, 2017). The criterion for handling categorical data in analysis also dictate that observations are not measured but rather their count of existence to certain holes/partitions/bins. This study is a categorical data analysis of certain categorical variables in the GSS dataset.

General Social Survey Dataset

There are various categorical variables in the dataset that can be used to assess certain attributes of the population. In this case, the variables “Political Party Affiliation” and “Sex of Respondent” are considered. The research question to be answered in this expedition is: Does gender determine in any level one’s political affiliation in America?

The null hypothesis to be tested states that there is no association between gender and political affiliation among Americans.

The descriptive study design fits this research question since the interest is in observation and description of characteristics or behaviours of the population, without examining the how/when/why questions about the behaviours, as articulated by Shuttleworth, (2008). The fit of the design is further grounded on the fact that causal effects of the association between gender and political affiliation are not required.

In this analysis “Respondent’s Sex” is the independent variable while “Political Party Affiliation” is the dependent variable. Both variables are measured on nominal levels, hence fitting categorical data analysis techniques in examination. 

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION * RESPONDENTS SEX Crosstabulation

 

RESPONDENTS SEX

Total

MALE

FEMALE

POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION

STRONG DEMOCRAT

Count

167

252

419

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

14.8%

18.2%

16.7%

NOT STR DEMOCRAT

Count

163

243

406

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

14.4%

17.6%

16.2%

IND,NEAR DEM

Count

157

180

337

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

13.9%

13.0%

13.4%

INDEPENDENT

Count

210

292

502

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

18.6%

21.1%

20.0%

IND,NEAR REP

Count

131

118

249

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

11.6%

8.5%

9.9%

NOT STR REPUBLICAN

Count

145

147

292

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

12.8%

10.6%

11.6%

STRONG REPUBLICAN

Count

120

125

245

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

10.6%

9.0%

9.8%

OTHER PARTY

Count

36

26

62

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

3.2%

1.9%

2.5%

Total

Count

1129

1383

2512

% within RESPONDENTS SEX

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

 Bivariate Table

 

Table 1: Bivariate table of Race and {Political Party Affiliation (Rows and Columns switched to fit in the paper).

While the survey participation constituted more females than males (55% to 45%), females are preliminary results from the cross-tabulation shows that women are more politically dynamic than men. This insinuation is affirmed by the higher distribution of females in both Democratic and Republican Categories (Either strong or not strong), pointing out the possibility of females being more politically dynamic than their male counterparts. Males, however, lead in Independent parties inclined towards Republican and affiliation to other parties outside the two main parties.

The Pearson Chi-Square Test of Association

Chi-Square Tests

 

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

24.950a

7

.001

Likelihood Ratio

24.944

7

.001

Linear-by-Linear Association

16.822

1

.000

N of Valid Cases

2512

 

 

Table 2: Table of Chi-Square test of association (Special focus on the Pearson Chi-Square column)

From the dataset, the χ2 = 24.95, p = .001 < 0.05, indicates that there is significant statistical association between gender and political affiliation (reject the null hypothesis). That is, males and females vary in political orientation.

Symmetric Measures

 

Value

Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal

Phi

.100

.001

Cramer’s V

.100

.001

N of Valid Cases

2512

 

 Table 3: test of association strength.

Phi and Cramer’s V are both tests of the strength of association. They both indicate significance (p < 0.05), meaning the association between gender and political affiliation is strong.

Discussion

While the little depth of previous research points to significant association between political affiliation and gender (a fact further affirmed by this study), they have mostly indicated that most women are more predisposed Democrat-oriented while men are more affiliated to the Republican Party (Rule & Ambady, 2010). In this replication, a difference is found – that women are more politically varied than men, in the sense that more women than men are in the two main political parties as further illustrated in the bar-graph below. Therefore, we conclude that based on the data, the female gender is more politically dynamic than its male counterpart.

 

References

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Leon-Guerrero, A. (2017). Social statistics for a diverse society. Sage Publications.

Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PloS one5(1), e8733.

Shuttleworth, M. (2008). Descriptive research design. Retrieved Apr15, 2015.

 

 

 

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?