-
-
-
- QUESTION
Discussion: Categorical Data Analysis
As with the previous week’s Discussion, this Discussion assists in solidifying your understanding of statistical testing by engaging in some data analysis. This week you will once again work with a real, secondary dataset to construct a research question, perform categorical data analysis that answers the question, and interpret the results.
Whether in a scholarly or practitioner setting, good research and data analysis should have the benefit of peer feedback. For this Discussion, you will post your response to the hypothesis test, along with the results. Be sure and remember that the goal is to obtain constructive feedback to improve the research and its interpretation, so please view this as an opportunity to learn from one another.
To prepare for this Discussion:
• Review Chapters 10 and 11 of the Frankfort-Nachmias & Leon-Guerrero course text and the media program found in this week’s Learning Resources related to bivariate categorical tests.
• Create a research question using the General Social Survey dataset that can be answered using categorical analysis.
By Day 3
Use SPSS to answer the research question. Post your response to the following:
1. What is your research question?
2. What is the null hypothesis for your question?
3. What research design would align with this question?
4. What dependent variable was used and how is it measured?
5. What independent variable is used and how is it measured?
6. If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect?
7. Explain your results for a lay audience and further explain what the answer is to your research question.
Be sure to support your Main Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Leon-Guerrero, A. (2018). Social statistics for a diverse society (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Chapter 9, “Bivariate Tables†(pp. 235-268)
• Chapter 11, “The Chi-Square Test and Measures of Association†(pp. 269-302)
-
-
Subject | Psychology | Pages | 5 | Style | APA |
---|
Answer
Categorical Data Analysis: Chi-Square Test of Association
Categorical data are recorded counts of observations that fall into any particular bin or hole, rather than quality of the observations themselves. Categorical data are either measured at the Ordinal level (categories with some inherent order) or nominal scale (categories with no particular order). Therefore, categorical data analysis focuses on the bins rather than the observations themselves, an examination of the collection of observations. Therefore, among the assumptions anchoring this mode of analysis include levels of measure (either nominal or ordinal), data consists of two or more independent categories, and categories are partitions (the pigeons/holes in which observations are placed are mutually exclusive and exhaustive) (Frankfort-Nachmias & Leon-Guerrero, 2017). The criterion for handling categorical data in analysis also dictate that observations are not measured but rather their count of existence to certain holes/partitions/bins. This study is a categorical data analysis of certain categorical variables in the GSS dataset.
General Social Survey Dataset
There are various categorical variables in the dataset that can be used to assess certain attributes of the population. In this case, the variables “Political Party Affiliation” and “Sex of Respondent” are considered. The research question to be answered in this expedition is: Does gender determine in any level one’s political affiliation in America?
The null hypothesis to be tested states that there is no association between gender and political affiliation among Americans.
The descriptive study design fits this research question since the interest is in observation and description of characteristics or behaviours of the population, without examining the how/when/why questions about the behaviours, as articulated by Shuttleworth, (2008). The fit of the design is further grounded on the fact that causal effects of the association between gender and political affiliation are not required.
In this analysis “Respondent’s Sex” is the independent variable while “Political Party Affiliation” is the dependent variable. Both variables are measured on nominal levels, hence fitting categorical data analysis techniques in examination.
POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION * RESPONDENTS SEX Crosstabulation |
|||||
|
RESPONDENTS SEX |
Total |
|||
MALE |
FEMALE |
||||
POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION |
STRONG DEMOCRAT |
Count |
167 |
252 |
419 |
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
14.8% |
18.2% |
16.7% |
||
NOT STR DEMOCRAT |
Count |
163 |
243 |
406 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
14.4% |
17.6% |
16.2% |
||
IND,NEAR DEM |
Count |
157 |
180 |
337 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
13.9% |
13.0% |
13.4% |
||
INDEPENDENT |
Count |
210 |
292 |
502 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
18.6% |
21.1% |
20.0% |
||
IND,NEAR REP |
Count |
131 |
118 |
249 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
11.6% |
8.5% |
9.9% |
||
NOT STR REPUBLICAN |
Count |
145 |
147 |
292 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
12.8% |
10.6% |
11.6% |
||
STRONG REPUBLICAN |
Count |
120 |
125 |
245 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
10.6% |
9.0% |
9.8% |
||
OTHER PARTY |
Count |
36 |
26 |
62 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
3.2% |
1.9% |
2.5% |
||
Total |
Count |
1129 |
1383 |
2512 |
|
% within RESPONDENTS SEX |
100.0% |
100.0% |
100.0% |
Bivariate Table
Table 1: Bivariate table of Race and {Political Party Affiliation (Rows and Columns switched to fit in the paper).
While the survey participation constituted more females than males (55% to 45%), females are preliminary results from the cross-tabulation shows that women are more politically dynamic than men. This insinuation is affirmed by the higher distribution of females in both Democratic and Republican Categories (Either strong or not strong), pointing out the possibility of females being more politically dynamic than their male counterparts. Males, however, lead in Independent parties inclined towards Republican and affiliation to other parties outside the two main parties.
The Pearson Chi-Square Test of Association
Chi-Square Tests |
|||
|
Value |
df |
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) |
Pearson Chi-Square |
24.950a |
7 |
.001 |
Likelihood Ratio |
24.944 |
7 |
.001 |
Linear-by-Linear Association |
16.822 |
1 |
.000 |
N of Valid Cases |
2512 |
|
|
Table 2: Table of Chi-Square test of association (Special focus on the Pearson Chi-Square column)
From the dataset, the χ2 = 24.95, p = .001 < 0.05, indicates that there is significant statistical association between gender and political affiliation (reject the null hypothesis). That is, males and females vary in political orientation.
Symmetric Measures |
|||
|
Value |
Approx. Sig. |
|
Nominal by Nominal |
Phi |
.100 |
.001 |
Cramer’s V |
.100 |
.001 |
|
N of Valid Cases |
2512 |
|
Table 3: test of association strength.
Phi and Cramer’s V are both tests of the strength of association. They both indicate significance (p < 0.05), meaning the association between gender and political affiliation is strong.
Discussion
While the little depth of previous research points to significant association between political affiliation and gender (a fact further affirmed by this study), they have mostly indicated that most women are more predisposed Democrat-oriented while men are more affiliated to the Republican Party (Rule & Ambady, 2010). In this replication, a difference is found – that women are more politically varied than men, in the sense that more women than men are in the two main political parties as further illustrated in the bar-graph below. Therefore, we conclude that based on the data, the female gender is more politically dynamic than its male counterpart.
References
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Leon-Guerrero, A. (2017). Social statistics for a diverse society. Sage Publications. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PloS one, 5(1), e8733. Shuttleworth, M. (2008). Descriptive research design. Retrieved Apr, 15, 2015.
|
Related Samples
The Role of Essay Writing Services in Online Education: A Comprehensive Analysis
Introduction The...
Write Like a Pro: Effective Strategies for Top-Notch Explication Essays
Introduction "A poem...
How to Conquer Your Exams: Effective Study Strategies for All Learners
Introduction Imagine...
Overcoming Writer’s Block: Strategies to Get Your Essays Flowing
Introduction The...
Optimizing Your Online Learning Experience: Tips and Tricks for Success
The world of education...