-
- QUESTION
Week 5: Clinical Decision Support Systems
No unread replies. No replies.
Purpose
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
- Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction (CO4)
- Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)
Total Points Possible: 150 Points
Requirements:
Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:
- This week we learned about the potential benefits and drawbacks to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table with a column for “Pro” and a separate column for “Con”. Include at least 3 items for each column. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you included it on the respective list.
- The primary goal of a CDSS is to leverage data and the scientific evidence to help guide appropriate decision making. CDSSs directly assist the clinician in making decisions about specific patients. For this discussion thread post, you are to assume your future role as an APN and create a clinical patient and scenario to illustrate an exemplary depiction of how a CDSS might influence your decision. This post is an opportunity for you to be innovative, so have fun!
Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:
- Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.
- Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.
- Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.
- Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.
For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.
Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
DISCUSSION CONTENT | |||
Category | Points | % | Description |
Application of Course Knowledge
|
50 | 33% | The quality for this category is determined by the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lessons and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations. |
Scholarliness and Scholarly Resources
|
40 | 27% |
This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.
|
Interactive Dialogue | 40 | 27% |
The quality for this category is determined by substantive written responses to a peer and faculty member’s questions in the threaded discussion. Substantive posts add importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion. Students must respond to least one peer in the threaded discussion. If no question asked directly from faculty, student must respond to questions posed to the entire class. Post must include at least one scholarly source.
|
Total CONTENT Points= 130 | |||
DISCUSSION FORMAT | |||
Category | Points | % | Description |
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format | 20 |
13%
|
Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation and APA* errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post. * APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included. **Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must add substantively to the discussion |
Total FORMAT Points= 20 | |||
DISCUSSION TOTAL=150 Points |
**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
Search entries or author Filter replies by unreadUnread Collapse replies Expand replies
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width_tablet="" width_phone="100%" width_last_edited="on|phone" max_width="100%"]
Subject | Nursing | Pages | 5 | Style | APA |
---|
Answer
-
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Decision making has become part of human life, and as such, effective decision making is an art and science of getting the best result for each scenario. Primarily, decision making is related to problem-solving; that is, individuals and clinicians try to change the present medical condition or situation for the better. Considering the need to arrive at a desirable decision within a workable time, systems that provide the needed information and participate in the general organizational decision-making processes have gained prominence in the medical field. They are known as Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) (Sutton et al., 2020). The clinical decision support system is an interactive clinical software designed to support the clinical experts navigate patient issues such as health care support and appropriate infrastructural support relevant for a specific patient case. Therefore, a clinical decision support system is a platform for making a medical observation to enhance the healthcare delivery system and enhance decision-making in relation to appropriate and existing clinical knowledge (Sutton et al., 2020). Nevertheless, despite the increasing use of the software since the 1970s to monitor and administer clinical practices, the approach has potential Pros and Cons, as discussed below.
Clinical Decision Support Systems Pros, Cons and Rationale.
Pros. Rationale Cons. Rationale It reduces the potential rate of medical errors while protecting patient safety. As an integral part of the clinical procedures, CDSSs help manage the clinical records that would otherwise hinder appropriate decision making for the present condition (Sutton et al., 2020). Moreover, the system analyzes data and records from other departments, thus helping to avoid medical contradictions and misdiagnosis that is harmful to the patient's well-being (Ancker et al., 2017). Therefore, CDSSs help reduces medical errors through continuous examination and thorough monitoring and evaluation of clinical details and records. Errors in healthcare can prove very costly, especially when such leads to loss of life. Therefore, this system is advantageous since it helps in enhancing patient and client safety. The system increases the chance of alert Fatigue and irrelevant alerts that may not synchronize with the prevailing conditions (Lambin et al., 2017). Most studies have established that many medical practitioners distrust the warnings when it concerns minor medical issues. Moreover, specific alerts go against the standard medical procedures to correct particular conditions, such as inflammatory conditions treated with a specific class of drugs administered through different routes (Sutton et al., 2020). Although every case in a health institution deserves special attention, the reality remains that some are more critical than others. Therefore, with numerous alerts, the service providers may be fatigued, as they may perceive them unnecessary disturbance. However, this should not make them ignore the alerts since they may increase the intensity of a patient’s situation. It reduces the medical costs and patient stay in the hospital. In addition to managing the patient’s medical history to reduce duplicity in medical tests, the system's unique feature was designed to issue clinical alerts on the various medical variations (Ancker et al., 2017). For instance, the prompt updates such as the injury level, recovery progress and new infections discovered can reduce the period of stay in the hospital and the healthcare costs as a result of wrong prescription or misdiagnosis.
This advantage becomes meaningful since healthcare should not only be efficient but also affordable. Thus, with a reduction in cost, CDSSs is more relevant and applicable in the contemporary health system.
Clinical decision support systems have the potential to impact physicians and clinicians (Ancker et al., 2017). Following the traditional approaches to medical practices that double-check entries and orders, CDSSs have created a scenario where it is not necessary to double the entries, which is not the absolute truth. Additionally, over-reliance on the CDSSs process has a long-term effect on the cognitive skills of the physicians who tend to forget some of the standout medical procedures so common with the medical profession (Sutton et al., 2020).
Despite building the physicians and healthcare providers in the pursuit of attaining efficiency, it also hampers their cognitive development, which makes it a reasonable con for a system and structure highly considered to bring massive changes in the medical industry.
Clinical Patient and Scenario of How CDSS Might Influence My Decision as an Advanced Practicing Nurse.
CDSS remains one of the popular practices in the medical field, which allows for appropriate management of data through advanced scientific methods of decision making (Sutton et al., 2020). As such, my patient and clinical scenario require the input of CDSSs in the Pediatric immunization delivery for children below two years. The pediatric immunization delivery system requires me to have appropriate knowledge of the patient’s history, parents' records, and the area of residences (Murthy et al., 2017). The decision-making system can help me navigate the process with appropriate notification on the due date for the vaccines.
Moreover, CDSS has helped me make the appropriate choice on the information storage mechanisms as documentation is part and parcel of the immunization practices to track the developments while monitoring the drug effects (Murthy et al., 2017). For instance, through the system, I have managed the vast records for school going children while tracking the progress and movements to adhere to the vaccine’s schedules. Additionally, because of the problem of maintaining a uniform implementation procedure, through the clinical alert feature in the Clinical decision support system, I have developed alert system specific to various child immunization schedules such as diphtheria shots, tetanus, and pertussis vaccines for children below age two in the CDSS guidelines (Murthy et al., 2017). It has helped me complete the processes within the period starting with a range that receives alert first. Lastly, CDSS has influenced how I handle the vaccination schedules through annual updates in line with the vaccine’s availability and shortages.
CDSSs improve medical outcomes while reducing the duplicity in medical tests (Ancker et al., 2017). Looking into the patient's past and present medical history, CDSSs presents comprehensive data that is relevant for effective treatment of the medical condition. Further, through scanning into the patient's records, the system helps reduces unnecessary medical costs and duplication in tests (Lambin et al., 2017). Therefore, CDSSs help clinicians manage the treatment costs that might rocket beyond an affordable level. The primary aim for every healthcare institution is to realize an improvement in the quality of outcome. Therefore, the system becomes more relevant because it ultimately helps in achieving this objective. There is likely a chance of registering inaccurate data and poor quality that might impact treatment procedure (Sutton et al., 2020). Studies have shown that the CDSSs continue to record and analyze patients' records even when there is a lack of appropriate medical supply. Further, the information gotten from the system can lead to false diagnosis when the policy is not updated accordingly (Ancker et al., 2017). Therefore, when poorly designed physicians and clinical users might enter generic data leading to medical outcomes. A total elimination of errors may not be attainable, especially since the CDSSs can keep recording and analyzing patients’ information even when unnecessary. Thus, makes it a critical demerit of the system.
.
References
Ancker, J. S., Edwards, A., Nosal, S., Hauser, D., Mauer, E., Kaushal, R., & With the HITEC Investigators. (2017). Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert Fatigue in a clinical decision support system. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 17(1), 36. Lambin, P., Zindler, J., Vanneste, B. G., Van De Voorde, L., Eekers, D., Compter, I., ... & Jochems, A. (2017). Decision support systems for personalized and participative radiation oncology. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 109, 131-153. Murthy, N., Rodgers, L., Pabst, L., Fiebelkorn, A. P., & Ng, T. (2017). Progress in childhood vaccination data in immunization information systems—United States, 2013–2016. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 66(43), 1178. Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 1-10.
Appendix
|
|