{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
  1. QUESTION

     

     

    omparing Leadership Theories

    To prepare for the Week 4 Assessment, reflect on the leadership theories presented in this week’s readings.

    Create a chart comparing at least 3 leadership theories presented in this week’s reading. In next week’s assignment, you will use this information to select leadership theories and approaches to support organizational change that aligns to your chosen organization’s mission and values.

    You can use these 3 leadership theories. Topic: (BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL)

    1. Vision- The first requirement for a leader is a strong sense of purpose. A vision of what could and should be is a basic force that enables the leader to recognize what must be done and to do it. Vision inspires others and causes the leader to accept the duties of leadership, whether pleasant or unpleasant. A sense of vision is especially powerful when it embodies a common cause- overcoming tyranny, stamping out hunger, or improving the human condition.
    2. Ability- The leader must know the job-or invite loss of respect. It helps if the leader has done the job before and done it well. Employees seldom respect the individual who constantly must rely on others when making decisions, giving guidance, or solving problems. Although employees usually shoe a great deal of patience with a new leader, they will lose faith in someone who fails to gain an understanding of the job within a reasonable period of time. Job knowledge helps the leader make good decisions and discover ways to improve efficiency. Also, the leader must keep job knowledge current. Failure to keep up leads to lack of confidence and loss of employee support. Finally, a leader must have a keen mind to understand information, formulate strategies, and make correct decisions.
    3. Persistence- The leader must have drive and determination to stick with difficult tasks until they are completed. According to Niccolo Machiavelli, “There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain as to success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things”. Israeli prime minister Golda Meir referred to the quality of persistence when she advised that things do not just occur in one’s life. She encouraged people to believe, be persistent, and struggle to overcome life’s obstacles.

     

 

Subject Administration Pages 5 Style APA

Answer

Comparing Leadership Theories

                Leadership theories present an insight into the schools of thought set forward with a primary aim of explaining how specific persons become leaders (Khan, 2017). The theories place a strong emphasis on the behavior or traits that the individuals adopt with an aim of boosting their leadership capacities. Past studies on leadership psychology have maintained that leadership skills are fundamental aspects that inherently live within individuals. However, with the emergence of leadership theories, leadership became a concept of interest during the beginning of time. This paper compares and contrasts three leadership theories: the Great Man Theory, Situational Theory, and the Transactional Theory.

Comparison Chart

The Great Man Theory

Situational Theory

Transactional Theory

The Great Man theory maintains that outstanding leaders are not made, but born. The theory holds a position that leadership qualities are born within a person and prevails within the bloodlines. The Great Man Theory further suggests that leadership features such as intuition, wit, intelligence, and courage are desirable qualities that are inherited down a bloodline (Robinson, 2018). The Great Man theory of leadership operates on a traditional view of leadership that suggests that when one is born of a leadership bloodline, the likelihood that he/she will have unique leadership qualities is enhanced (Robinson, 2018).

The great man theory is founded on the assumption that great leaders will always possess specific traits that ensure that they can rise into a leadership position hence enabling the followers to look up to them. Moreover, the theorists are based on the notion that the great leader can arise in the events whereby their need rises. The framework further maintains that the people in power deserved to be called leaders based on the prevailing leadership traits endowed within them (Robinson, 2018).

The situational theory of leadership maintains that no specific theory under the leadership context can be applied to address all the situations (Chon & Park, 2019). Moreover, the situational leadership theory observes that leaders should have the ability to adjust their leadership traits to fit within the prevailing situation. Therefore, it is accurate to derive that situational leadership theory relies on a flexible form of management whereby the leaders are required to delegate, command, coach, and persuade the subordinates to follow the established management decisions (Chon & Park, 2019).

The situational form of leadership is regarded as an effective style since the leader will change the prevailing style of leadership to meet the goals of the team (Chon & Park, 2019).

The transactional leadership theory is founded on the notion that an effective leader should always reward the subordinate’s good deeds. Additionally, the leaders should also rebuke the wrong deeds of the followers (Khan, 2017). This form of leadership offers priority to the order, structure, and hierarchy of the firm depending on the member’s creativity. In comparison to the great man theory and the situational form of leadership, transactional leadership is most preferred since it motivates the subordinates towards ascertaining their goal within a team(Khan, 2017).

Therefore, it is evident that transactional leadership is mainly focused on directing and motivating subordinates through actions that appeal to their self-interest. The power allocated to transactional leaders is established on their formal responsibility and authority within the team (Khan, 2017). The primary goal of the subordinates is to obey the instructions provided by the leader while ensuring that the primary goals of the team are achieved.

 

References

Chon, M., & Park, H. (2019). Predicting public support for government actions in a public health crisis: Testing fear, organization-public relationship, and behavioral intention in the framework of the situational theory of problem solving. Health Communication, Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/predicting-public-support-government-actions/docview/2389819451/se-2?accountid=45049

Khan, N. (2017). Adaptive or transactional leadership in current higher education: A brief comparison. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3) Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/adaptive-transactional-leadership-current-higher/docview/1934154241/se-2?accountid=45049

Robinson, M. (2018). Shared Leadership: A Rediscovery Of An Old Paradigm And Its Historical Context. The Journal of Applied Christian Leadership, 12(2), 54-70. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/shared-leadership-rediscovery-old-paradigm/docview/2414850908/se-2?accountid=45049

 

 

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?