In El Rinche: The Ghost Ranger of the Rio Grande, Christopher Carmona reconstructs how the Texas Rangers brutalized and killed Mexican Tejana/o families in order to assist Anglos in power who desired agricultural development in South Texas. Although this book is a work of fiction, it nonetheless provides an important window into how Mexican Tejanas/os sought to hold on to their lands in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
Assignment: You are required to write an 900 to 1,000 word book essay on El Rinche. For this essay, you should not provide a mere summary of the book. Rather, you are required to provide your critical analysis by answering five reading response essay questions. An effective reading response essay demonstrates that you have a deep understanding of the reading and have substantiated your critical analysis by providing quotes and details from the book. You can only use the book to answer the questions below. Any use of outside sources will result in a zero.
Your essay should be in Times New Roman, 12 point font, double-spaced, and 1” margins. You do not need a cover page. Your first page would have your name, the date, and the title of the assignment at the top left corner.
All quotes should be cited using MLA, or parenthetical references: (Carmona 19).
To effectively answer each question below, provide a paragraph that has details from the book as well as two to three quotes from the book that you analyze to support your response to the question. You should not merely provide quotes, but rather, analyze these quotes and tell me how these quotes answer the essay question. In total, you will have five paragraphs. You do not need an introduction nor conclusion.
- What different methods did the Texas Rangers use in order to push Mexican Tejanas/os off their land? ALSO, how did they get the assistance of people who were not Texas Rangers in order to push Mexican Tejanas/os off their land?
- How did the character El Rinche empower Mexican Tejanas/os to resist the Texas Rangers? Also, why did Mexican Tejanas/os create a legend and a corrido (song) about El Rinche?
- Why did a Mexican Tejano, an African American, a Native American, and a Japanese
American come together to resist the Texas Rangers? ALSO, how were African Americans, Native Americans, and Japanese Americans each treated in South Texas by the Anglos in power and the Texas Rangers? You should tell me how each group was treated.
- What parts of the book did you like the most, and why?
- If you were a Mexican Tejana/o who owned land in South Texas, would you have resisted the Texas Rangers? If so, explain why. If not, explain why not. You should make sure to include and analyze two to three quotes when answering this question, as you did for the other four questions.
Purpose: This book essay allows you to gain mastery in the student learning outcome of analyzing the effects of historical, social, political, economic, cultural, and global forces on this period of United States history.
Your essay will be evaluated for how well you answer the questions by providing details
from the book for each question, having SHORT analyzed quotes that support your critical
analysis for each question, the length, and grammatical as well as spelling errors. The use
of any outside sources will result in an F. You can only use on the book to answer the five questions.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>