-
QUESTION
Emergency Management Perspectives on Cyber security
EDMG600 B001 Fall 2020
Weeks 3-4 Written Assignment (submit here)Submit a single APA Formatted Paper (1500 word approximation). You must have an introduction and conclusion. Please use the APA Paper template attached.
Part 1 of 2 (refer to Week 3 Readings in the Lessons for Week 3)
Evaluate arguments by
Clemente (2013)
Department of Defense, Cyber Strategy (2018)
FEMA (2013) CIPP
Specifically, respond to the following questions:
What issues are common?
What are the differences is their assessment of cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection?
How does FEMA's Critical Infrastructure Protection Plan address key requirements set for by Clemente (2013)?
Conclude with a research or policy question for further research.
Part 2 of 2 (refer to Week 4 Readings in the Lessons for Week 4)
Findings and Lessons Learned in Xia, Becerra-Fernandez, Gudi, & Rocha-Mier (2011)
Information Fusion in Hennessy, Patterson & Lin (Eds.) (2003).
Can these findings be utilized in your city, county, state EOC. Why? Why not?
Conclude with a research or policy question.
You must utilize literature and cite properly.
Use APA style. Submit as Microsoft Word document.
Name the single file "EDMG600Weeks3-4_YourLastName.doc/x" (e.g., EDMG600Weeks3-4_Pesic.doc/x).
| Subject | Technolgy | Pages | 6 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
-
-
Weeks 3-4 Assignment
Begin the paper with an introduction of your topic. An introduction has an attention getter, purpose or thesis statement, and an overview. An attention getter can begin with any of the 6 ways: (1) Anecdote, (2) Question, (3) Quotation, (4) Humor, (5) Shocking Statistic, or a (6) combination of them (http://classroom.synonym.com/5-types-attention-getters-essays-2877.html). After you introduce the topic, state the purpose of the paper. The purpose can be as simple as restating the objective of the assignment. The purpose of this paper is to (state purpose). (Overview) The paper will address the following: (List topics)
Argument and Thesis
Clement Cyber Security and Global Interdependence
Discuss and evaluate the arguments, themes, tenets and assertions. Provide a detailed discussion and proved APA formatted citations. Ensure your paragraphs are supported.
Department of Defense Cyber Strategy
Discuss and evaluate the arguments, themes, tenets and assertions. Provide a detailed discussion and proved APA formatted citations. Ensure your paragraphs are supported.
FEMA National Infrastructure Protection Plan
Discuss and evaluate the arguments, themes, tenets and assertions. Provide a detailed discussion and proved APA formatted citations. Ensure your paragraphs are supported.
Common Themes
Discuss and evaluate the arguments, themes, tenets and assertions. Provide a detailed discussion and proved APA formatted citations. Ensure your paragraphs are supported.
Differences in Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Assessment
Discuss and evaluate the arguments, themes, tenets and assertions. Provide a detailed discussion and proved APA formatted citations. Ensure your paragraphs are supported.
FEMA's Critical Infrastructure Protection Strategy and Clemente Key Requirements
Discuss and evaluate the arguments, themes, tenets and assertions. Provide a detailed discussion and proved APA formatted citations. Ensure your paragraphs are supported.
Application of Knowledge Sharing Strategies and Information Fusion in the EOC
(Describe the main points and tenets of the arguments). This is the second main point as listed in the overview and pulled from the assignment. It also ensures you address all points on the scoring rubric. Please provide example to support your research or assumptions. Real world events, experiences, opinions based on research, conclusions based on research. Be sure to use in text citation (Author, 2014).
Research or Policy Question for Further Research
State a research or policy question.
Conclusion
Conclusions wrap up what you have been discussing in your paper. After moving from general to specific information in the introduction and body paragraphs, your conclusion should begin pulling back into more general information that restates the main points of your argument. Conclusions may also call for action or overview future possible research. The following outline may help you conclude your paper:
In a general way,
- Restate your topic and why it is important,
- Restate your thesis/claim,
- Address opposing viewpoints and explain why readers should align with your position,
- Call for action or overview future research possibilities.
-
References
-
-
-
Bellovin, S. M., Bradner, S. O., Diffie, W, Landau, S. & Rexford, J. (2011). Can it really work? Problems with extending EINSTEIN 3 to critical infrastructure. Harvard National Security Journal. 3.1, pp. 1-38
Clemente, D. (2013). Cyber security and global interdependence: What is critical? Programme Report. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/189645#
FEMA. (2013). National infrastructure protection plan. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/national-infrastructure-protection-plan-2013-508.pdf
Hennessy, J.L., Patterson, D.A, & Lin, H.S. (Eds.). (2003). Information technology for counterterrorism: Immediate actions and future possibilities. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/10640/
Saadawi, T & Jordan, J. Jr. (Eds.). (2011). Cyber infrastructure protection. Carlisle Barracks: U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute
Xia, W., Becerra-Fernandez, I., Gudi, A., & Rocha-Mier, J. (2011). Emergency management task complexity and knowledge-sharing strategies. Cutter IT Journal, 24(1), pp. 20-25
-
-
Related Samples
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color="#E02B20" divider_weight="2px" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width="10%" module_alignment="center" custom_margin="|||349px||"][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner use_custom_gutter="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px||" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="13px||16px|0px|false|false"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_blog fullwidth="off" post_type="project" posts_number="5" excerpt_length="26" show_more="on" show_pagination="off" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" header_font="|600|||||||" read_more_font="|600|||||||" read_more_text_color="#e02b20" width="100%" custom_padding="|||0px|false|false" border_radii="on|5px|5px|5px|5px" border_width_all="2px" box_shadow_style="preset1"][/et_pb_blog][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type="1_4" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_sidebar orientation="right" area="sidebar-1" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|-3px||||"][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built="1" specialty="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_padding="0px|0px|0px|||"][et_pb_column type="3_4" specialty_columns="3" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="28px|||||"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"]- QUESTION
Week 4 Discusssion
Choose ONE of the following discussion question options to respond to: Using Adverse Conditions to a Company's AdvantageThis is a discussion question that I need answered. I need the second portion of the questioned answered thoroughly, both bullet points. I have highlighted it in yellow to show that it is what I need answered. I need this r returned to me completed without any grammatical or punctual errors. The company that I want this question written about is Nissan Motor Corporation. - Chakravorti (2010) discusses four methods that corporate innovators use to turn adverse conditions to their advantage. Examine an organization of your choice and briefly discuss how the organization might use one of these methods.
- Using the company of your choice, identify an important and difficult decision that they faced. What were the most important risks and the most important rewards of the decision?
- What data, analysis or perspective would you have used to help Sr. Management decide if the rewards outweighed the risks?
| Subject | Business | Pages | 4 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
Assessing Risk and Reward
The Nissan Motor Company is one of the leading automobile makers in the world. The Japanese carmaker has primarily enjoyed a successful run, allowing it to enter various regional and international markets such as the United States. However, the changing business environment was not favorable to the company in 2019. Notably, the cooperation recorded losses amounting to 7.8%. The experience pushed the management into making tough decisions, requiring almost all of its North American workforce to go for unpaid leaves.
In late 2019, the company announced that the decline in sales necessitated a two-day unpaid leave for the North American workers. The stated days for the vacation were January 2 and 3rd (Chicago Tribune, 2019). Notably, this move was a crucial decision for the company because of its conflicting impacts. Whereas on the positive side, it could help the firm minimize expenses, it threatened to affect the public perception of the company regarding employee welfare.
The rewards for the decision involved cutting expenses by not paying the workers on leave, which eventually would translate into reduced expenses. Another reward was that the decision could allow the company to optimize performance by evaluating employee performances then developing new milestones. However, on the low side, the company risked affecting its public image and brand name, especially in the North American market. As per Chakravorti (2010), the way an organization treats its employees influences the firm's public perception. Thus, Nissan risked eliciting a negative public perception. With a distorted public image, the company could fail to revive its declining sales.
I would have advised the management of Nissan to utilize the Predictive Analytic perspective in determining the right decision to take. Ideally, the approach tries to predict what might happen in the future if particular decisions or actions are undertaken at the moment (Traymbak & Aggarwal, 2019). Looking at the situation at Nissan, the company needed to develop a goal such as increasing sales. After that, they would have made decisions aimed at realizing the set goal. In this regard, the predicted outcome could give the management an overview of whether more risks existed or significant rewards could be realized.
.
References
-
Marcus, L. J., Dorn, B. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). 3 Meta-Leadership And National Emergency Preparedness Strategies To Build Government Connectivity.