{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

QUESTION

Evaluating Purpose Statements    

THIS IS THE ARTICLE ASSIGNED Dank, M., Lachman, P., Zweig, J. M., & Yahner, J. (2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 846-57. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8
Post a critique of the research study in which you:
• Evaluate the research questions and hypotheses.

The Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation. Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post.

• Identify the type of quantitative research design used and explain how the researchers implemented the design.
• Analyze alignment among the theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design.

Evaluating Purpose Statements

There is a link between understanding the purpose of one’s research and selecting the appropriate methods to investigate the questions that are derived from that purpose.

–(Newman, Ridenour, Newman, & DeMarco, G. M. P., Jr., 2003, p. 169)

For this Discussion, you will evaluate the purpose statements in assigned journal articles in your discipline and consider the alignment of theory, problem, and purpose. You will also explain your position on the relationship between research and social change.

Alignment means that a research study possesses clear and logical connections among all of its various components. To achieve these connections, researchers must carefully craft the components of their study such that when they are viewed together, there is a coherent interrelationship.

As you read the authors’ purpose statements, consider how well the intent of the study, and its connection to the problem and theoretical framework, is presented. Also consider if the purpose statement reveals the study’s potential for engendering positive social change.

As you know, social change is a distinguishing feature of Walden University’s mission. Positive social change implies a transformation that results in positive outcomes. This can happen at many levels (e.g., individual, family systems, neighborhoods, organizations, nationally and globally); and positive social change can occur at different rates: slow and gradual or fast and radical.

With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. You will switch your journal article assignment from Week 3. 

 

THIS IS THE ARTICLE ASSIGNED TO ME:

Dank, M., Lachman, P., Zweig, J. M., & Yahner, J. (2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 846-57. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8

Post a critique of the research study in which you:

  • Evaluate the research questions and hypotheses.

    The Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation. Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post.

  • Identify the type of quantitative research design used and explain how the researchers implemented the design.
  • Analyze alignment among the theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design.

.

 

Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist Use the following criteria to evaluate an author’s research questions and/or hypotheses. Look for indications of the following:

  • Is the research question(s) a logical extension of the purpose of the study?
  • Does the research question(s) reflect the best question to address the problem?
  • Does the research question(s) align with the design of the study?
  • Does the research question(s) align with the method identified for collecting data? If the study is qualitative, does the research question(s) do as follows?
  • Relate the central question to the qualitative approach
  • Begin with What or How (not Why) • Focus on a single phenomenon • Use exploratory verbs
  • Use nondirectional language
  • Use an open-ended format
  • Specify the participants and research site If the study is quantitative:
  • Do the descriptive questions seek to describe responses to major variables?
  • Do the inferential questions seek to compare groups or relate variables?
  • Do the inferential questions follow from a theory?
  • Are the variables positioned consistently from independent/predictor to dependent/outcome in the inferential questions?
  • Is a null and/or alternative hypothesis provided as a predictive statement?
  • Is the hypothesis consistent with its respective research question?
  • Does the question(s) and/or hypothesis specify the participants and research site? If the study is mixed methods, do the research questions and/or hypotheses do the following?
  • Include the characteristics of a good qualitative research question (as listed above)
  • Include the characteristics of a good quantitative research and/or hypothesis (as listed above) • Indicate how the researcher will mix or integrate the two approaches of the study
  • Specify the participants and research site
  • Convey the overall intent of the study that calls for a mixed methods approach

 

 

 

 

Subject Article Analysis Pages 6 Style APA

Answer

 

Article Critique

his paper presents a critique of the research study that includes evaluation of the research questions, hypothesis, and research design. The article being critiqued is Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth by Dank, Lachman, Zweig, and Yahner (2014). This critique concludes that accountability of the study results lies with the use of appropriate study design, credited resources, and measurement scales.

In their research study, Dank et al. (2014) adopted a cross-sectional research design. The cross-sectional design involved a large-scale survey of multiple 7th – 12th-grade youths in recruited schools. A cross-sectional design was an appropriate choice for the study as it allowed the researchers to compare different groups at the same time. This study aimed at examining dating violent experiences of LGB youths as compared to heterosexual youths (Dank et al., 2014). According to Thutoemang and Oppong (2021), the advantage of a cross-sectional study design is that it is an inexpensive and time-saving method to survey a large population at the same time. About this research study, the variables in comparison are the LGB youth population versus the heterosexuality youth population. Further, the study had to compare different demographic measures within these populations that included age, race, sexual orientation, and State location.

The problem statement of this research was that media’s attention towards hate violence among LGB groups fails to unmask the interpersonal violence that may exist within these groups, especially dating violence. The study was guided by four research questions that were without a doubt an extension of the purpose of the study. To acquire more precise information, the authors sectioned their survey based on different attributes relevant to the research questions. The study further adopted different scales developed by other researchers to measure certain attributes. For instance, to measure psychological dating abuse, the study adopted Foshee’s psychological abuse scales. According to Fernández-González et al. (2017) validity and reliability of Foshee’s Acceptance for dating scale (ADV) scale has been acknowledged in psychological studies involving adolescents. 

All inferential questions sought to compare LGB groups against heterosexual groups based on risk factors, health-seeking behavior, frequency, and rates of partner violence experiences. Overall, all mentioned hypotheses were consistent with the respective research questions. One hypothetical notion that this study aimed to address was that the LGB youths experience higher levels of interpersonal violence compared to the heterosexual youths. In respect to this hypothesis was the first question “how often do LGB youth experience and/or perpetrate dating violence and abuse, and do these rates differ from those for heterosexual youth?” (Danke et al., 2014, p. 847). According to the study results, “LGB youth were more likely to report being victimized physical dating violence, psychological dating abuse, cyber dating abuse, and sexual coercion than heterosexual youth” (Danke et al., 2014, p.854). This null hypothesis provided a predictive statement that aligned with the study findings.

The third question, “do LGB youth seek help if they experience dating violence and abuse, and do their help-seeking behaviors differ from that for heterosexual victims?” addressed a notion raised by qualitative evidence that LGB youths were more likely to seek support from informal sources such as friends and families than formal services. Further, previous studies claim that LGB victims of dating violence perceived the existing assistance systems unhelpful to youths of their sexual orientation (Dank et al., 2014). Similarly, this alternative hypothesis acted as a predictive statement that LGB victims of teen dating violence were more likely to seek help, particularly from informal sources than heterosexual youth.

 

Overall, the authors achieved effective implementation of cross-sectional research design and proper alignment of hypothesis/ research questions with the study purpose (Sovacool et al., 2018). The accountability of the results lies with the use of appropriate study design, credited resources, and measurement scales.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

 

 

Dank, M., Lachman, P., Zweig, J. M., & Yahner, J. (2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of youth and adolescence43(5), 846-857. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8

Fernández-González, L., Calvete, E., & Orue, I. (2017). The Acceptance of Dating Violence scale (ADV): Psychometric properties of the Spanish version. Psicothema29(2), 241-246. Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72750577015.pdf

Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018). Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy Research & Social Science45, 12-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007

Thutoemang, T. C., & Oppong, S. (2021). Utilizing Cross-Sectional Study Design, Multi-Site Sampling, and Multiple Data Collection Platforms to Investigate the Influence of Paternal Involvement on Female Reproductive Strategies. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529761429

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?