{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

There is often a crucial difference in the evidence of best practice and the care delivered in mental health settings, particularly in relation to change.
This assessment requires you to review and discuss an area where there is a difference and discuss why this is so.
This brief discussion requires you to provide a synopsis of your findings.

1. Critically contrast the findings from the literature with that of current practice and /or policy in clinical settings.

Assessment details
Participate in the following discussion board topic by performing the following steps:
Choose an area where practice may lag behind evidence. For example:
• Identification and treatment of addiction in mental health contexts
• Lived experience of mental ill health in the workforce
• Management of the effects of Psychological Trauma experienced as a child in clinical practice
Briefly identify the evidence and critically debate why there is a practice gap between evidence and clinical practice

Sample Solution

 

The literature on best practices in mental health settings often stresses the importance of change, including the need to move away from a focus on symptom management and towards one that takes into account broader factors such as social determinants of health, culture, lifestyle factors and trauma-informed approaches. In particular, research suggests that early interventions for mental health conditions are crucial for prevention and improved outcomes. Despite this evidence base, current practice in many clinical settings is still largely focused on treatment with medications rather than other therapies or strategies. Furthermore, there is limited access to psychological services in some areas due to funding constraints or lack of resources.

Sample Solution

 

The literature on best practices in mental health settings often stresses the importance of change, including the need to move away from a focus on symptom management and towards one that takes into account broader factors such as social determinants of health, culture, lifestyle factors and trauma-informed approaches. In particular, research suggests that early interventions for mental health conditions are crucial for prevention and improved outcomes. Despite this evidence base, current practice in many clinical settings is still largely focused on treatment with medications rather than other therapies or strategies. Furthermore, there is limited access to psychological services in some areas due to funding constraints or lack of resources.

Following the trend of most democratic regimes around the globe, Brazil transitioned from an authoritarian governing system to a democratic system after rectifying the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. Currently, Brazil is considered to be a democratic republic with a bicameral legislative system of an upper house chamber and a lower house chamber, whose seats are filled based on federalist electoral rules. While these rules were created with the purpose of representative equality, the results have stirred controversy over Brazil’s electoral efficiency and effectiveness. Since Brazil’s democracy is fairly young, it is difficult to discern what the long-term effects of the electoral system will be. Some political scientists pose the question of what consequences an open-list proportional system would impose on the United States if they adopted a parallel election system. Yet, this hypothetical question means questioning one form of democracy over another, despite the fact that the term “democracy” has yet to obtain a firm definition, leads scholars to tip-toe around the subject. While one must walk on eggshells, it is a question worth asking and can provide interesting insights into future democratic possibilities.

As previously stated, Brazilian legislature is comprised of an upper chamber, the Senate, or Senado, and a lower Chamber of Deputies, or Câmara dos Deputados. Formally, the Senate contains 81 seats, where three senators are chosen from each of the 27 federal states to ensure equal representation. In the Chamber of Deputies, 513 seats are chosen based on the open-list proportional representation, or open-list PR, the electoral system instituted within Brazilian politics. As stated by J. Tyler Dickovick and Jonathan Eastwood in Comparative Politics, “this system allows each voter to select a specific candidate and then attempts to achieve proportionality by aggregating the votes across parties,” (Dickovick/Eastwood, 209). In Brazil and European nations, open-list PR features the opportunity for political parties to gain house support from the var

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?