Evidence-Based Practice Problem and Search Strategy

[et_pb_section fb_built="1" specialty="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_padding="0px|0px|0px|||"][et_pb_column type="3_4" specialty_columns="3" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="28px|||||"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" hover_enabled="0" sticky_enabled="0"]

QUESTION

 Discussion2    

MY PICOT TOPIC:

My topic is about stroke recurrence for those smokers and non smokers. Patients who recovered from stroke tends to go back to their previous habit of smoking since they are not aware if smoking is giving them higher chance of getting the stroke again(Jingjing et al., Impact of Smoking Status on Stroke Recurrence).

PICOT QUESTION:

In patients who have experienced stroke(P), how does being a smoker (I) compared to a nonsmoker (C)developed higher risk of recurrence (O) during the first 1 year after stroke?

 

 

Instructions

In this assignment, you will select an evidence-based practice problem from an identified list of topics provided by your course faculty (this is the topic you selected and identified in your unit 1 discussion).  After selecting a topic from the provided list, you will develop a PICOT question around your topic. Then, you will discuss the selected topic problem and significance of the problem, as well as your search strategy in locating three research articles that align to your selected topic.

For this assignment, be sure to include the following assignment criteria in your paper:

  1. Discuss your selected evidence-based practice problem/topic.
  2. Discuss the significance of the selected evidence-based practice problem.
    1. Support your discussion in terms of statistics and evidence-based outcomes.
  3. Describe your PICOT question created around the selected evidence-based practice problem.
    1. Included the individual PICOT components, as well as a combine PICOT question, in sentence format.
  4. Identify the threearticles you selected that address the problem which is the focus of your PICOT question.
  5. Describe the search strategy you used to locate these threearticles, including terms used when search, the research databases, and how you refined your search to select the three articles.
  6. Provide a conclusion to summarize your findings.

Remember to support your ideas with the articles you found. These articles should be less than five (5) years old. They should not be from the Web, but from the library databases, and be sure to use a narrative format.

In addition, you must follow APA guidelines, providing a title page, reference page, and in-text citations, as well as use level headings to match the assignment criteria listed above.

Please use, at minimum three scholarly references, and your paper should be 300-400 words, excluding title and reference pages.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Supporting Materials:

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

 

 

 

 

 

NU560 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric

NU560 Unit 2 Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

NU560-CO3

75 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

67.5 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed

60 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

53.65 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

44.42 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

NU560-CO3

30 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

26.4 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

24 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

21.6 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

18 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

PRICE-I; PRICE-P

10 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting

PRICE-I; PRICE-P

10 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

9 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

8 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

7 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

6 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

10 pts

Total Points: 125

PreviousNext

 

 

 

 

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width_tablet="" width_phone="100%" width_last_edited="on|phone" max_width="100%"]

Subject Nursing Pages 6 Style APA
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner module_class="the_answer" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width="100%" custom_margin="||||false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|0px|||false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|desktop"]

Answer

Evidence-Based Practice Problem and Search Strategy

This paper discusses my chosen topic problem, significance of the problem, and my search strategy in identifying three research articles that align to my selected topic. The areas covered in this paper are my selected evidence-based practice topic or problem, significance of the chosen evidence-based practice problem, description of my PICOT question, three articles selected to address the evidence-based practice problem, and search strategy. 

Selected Evidence-Based Practice Topic or Problem

My selected evidence-based problem concerns the recurrence of stroke for non-smokers and smokers after they have recovered from this illness. Patients or individuals, who have recuperated from stroke, often go back to their former behavior of smoking as they are unaware of the potential of smoking to cause stroke again (Chen et al., 2019).

Significance of the Chosen Evidence-Based Practice Problem

According to Feigin, Norrving, and Mensah (2017), stroke is considered the second largest death cause and the third largest disability cause, accounting for 10 percent of the world’s illness burden. Pan et al. (2019) and Chen et al. (2019) consider cigarette smoking a modifiable and well-established risk factor of stroke. Survivors of stroke have higher subsequent stroke risk, and recurrent stroke is considered more disabling and fatal relative to the first-ever stroke (Chen et al., 2019). Nonetheless, there is lack of adequate studies on the impact of smoking cessation and smoking on the recurrence of stroke (Chen et al., 2019).  As such, there is a significant need to establish the relationship between smoking and non-smoking, and stroke recurrence (Chen et al., 2019; Pan et al., 2019).  

Description of My PICOT Question

My PICOT question is described as follows:

Population: Patients who have experienced stroke

Intervention: Being a smoker

Comparison: compare to nonsmoker

Outcome: development of higher risk of recurrence

Time: during the first year after stroke

The PICOT question is as provided below:

In patients who have experienced stroke(P), how does being a smoker (I) compared to a nonsmoker (C)developed higher risk of recurrence (O) during the first 1 year after stroke?

Three Articles Selected to Address the Evidence-Based Practice Problem

The three articles that address my selected evidence-based practice problem are as follows:

  1. Epstein, K. A., Viscoli, C. M., Spence, J. D., Young, L. H., Inzucchi, S. E., Gorman, M., ... & IRIS Trial Investigators. (2017). Smoking cessation and outcome after ischemic stroke or TIA. Neurology89(16), 1723-1729.
  2. Matsuo, R., Ago, T., Kiyuna, F., Sato, N., Nakamura, K., Kuroda, J., ... & Fukuoka Stroke Registry Investigators. (2020). Smoking status and functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke51(3), 846-852.
  3. van den Berg, M. J., van der Graaf, Y., Deckers, J. W., de Kanter, W., Algra, A., Kappelle, L. J., ... & SMART study group. (2019). Smoking cessation and risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality after a first manifestation of arterial disease. American heart journal213, 112-122.

 

Search Strategy

My search was conducted on Proquest database. The inclusion criteria were articles not older than five years since their publication time, articles focusing on my PICOT question, and articles written in English. My exclusion criteria were articles older than five years since their time of publication, articles not focusing on my PICOT query, and articles not written in English. Since my search strategy was based on my PICOT question, the key terms for searches were derived from this question. In relation to this, the key terms employed in performing the search were “stroke recurrence,” “smokers,” “nonsmokers,” “higher risk,” and “after stroke.” Since there were no articles focusing on stroke recurrence 1 year after stroke, I settled on articles that focus on stroke recurrence from 3 months onwards.

Conclusion

There exists a robust relationship between smoking and the risk for the recurrence of smoke (van den Berg et al., 2019; Matsuo et al., 2020; Epstein, 2017). After suffering from stroke, patients who persist in the smoking behavior are highly vulnerable to the stroke recurrence risk (Matsuo et al., 2020; Epstein, 2017). Irrespective of a person’s age, the cessation of cigarette smoking following stroke is associated with a lower likelihood of stroke recurrence relative to persistent smoking (van den Berg et al., 2019).

\

 

References

 

Chen, J., Li, S., Zheng, K., Wang, H., Xie, Y., Xu, P., ... & Xu, G. (2019). Impact of smoking status on stroke recurrence. Journal of the American Heart Association8(8), e011696.

Feigin, V. L., Norrving, B., & Mensah, G. A. (2017). Global burden of stroke. Circulation research120(3), 439-448.

Pan, B., Jin, X., Jun, L., Qiu, S., Zheng, Q., & Pan, M. (2019). The relationship between smoking and stroke: a meta-analysis. Medicine98(12).

 

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|desktop" custom_padding="60px||6px|||"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" min_height="34px" custom_margin="||4px|1px||"]

Related Samples

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color="#E02B20" divider_weight="2px" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width="10%" module_alignment="center" custom_margin="|||349px||"][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner use_custom_gutter="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px||" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="13px||16px|0px|false|false"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_blog fullwidth="off" post_type="project" posts_number="5" excerpt_length="26" show_more="on" show_pagination="off" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" header_font="|600|||||||" read_more_font="|600|||||||" read_more_text_color="#e02b20" width="100%" custom_padding="|||0px|false|false" border_radii="on|5px|5px|5px|5px" border_width_all="2px" box_shadow_style="preset1"][/et_pb_blog][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type="1_4" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_sidebar orientation="right" area="sidebar-1" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|-3px||||"][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section]