{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
  1. QUESTION

     

     

    Understanding of probability is key in making business decisions. The following questions begin to test your understanding of the different forms of probability and the data on which probabilistic decision making is based.

    Review the important themes within the sub questions of each bullet point. The sub questions are designed to get you thinking about some of the important issues. Your response should provide a succinct synthesis of the key themes in a way that articulates a clear point, position, or conclusion supported by research. Select a different bullet point section than what your classmates have already posted so that we can engage several discussions on relevant topics. If all of the bullet points have been addressed, then you may begin to re-use the bullet points with the expectation that varied responses continue.

    You are a risk manager in a manufacturing company. One of your key responsibilities is securing of property insurance coverage to provide protection against damage caused by “acts of God,” such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, etc. You begin the process with exposure due diligence, which is focused on estimating the chances of a single “act of God” occurring in the course of the upcoming year, as well as the chances of two or more “acts of God” materializing (also in the course of the next year).
    Determine where you might be able to find valid data for this type of analysis.
    Justify the use of the concept of conditional probability in the context of your task—more specifically, discuss how you would use conditional probability in your exposure due diligence efforts. Support your discussion with relevant examples, research, and rationale.

     

 

Subject Administration Pages 3 Style APA

Answer

Exposure Due Diligence

In insurance, exposure due diligence helps in evaluation and assessment of the true value of mergers and accusations (Reibstein, Petkun & Rudolph, 2013). To realize this objective exposure due diligence involves a detailed of insurance, workers compensation and overall risk management practice. All these help in identifying problem areas that could have an impact on the performance of the company (Andrew & White, 2017; Klein, 2016). These problem areas includes: uninsured and unfunded exposures, advance claims trends, bad debt management and environmental risks. Environmental risks results into losses that potentially and adversely affect the company. As a result an environmental insurance policy is used to fill the insurance coverage gaps created by these risks. Due to the great variation of environmental risks, environmental insurance policies also vary greatly (Klein, 2016). Among key environmental risks are “acts of God”. An “act of God” refers to any natural disaster that cannot be foreseen or prevented in any way by human beings and it causes damage. Acts of God include naturally occurring catastrophes such as hail, lightning, windstorm, earthquakes, erupting volcanos, tornados and hurricanes. Therefore the work of estimating the chances of a single “Act of God” occurring in the cause of upcoming year as well as the chances of more than one “Act of God” materializing in the cause of next year due diligence is important (Andrew & White, 2017; Reibstein, Petkun & Rudolph, 2013).

Conditional Probability and Insurance

In risk assessment model, data in use is conditional in nature. Trustworthy and valid data can easily be obtained from meteorological department and other departments that monitor the occurrence of natural catastrophes (Bayraktar, Promislow & Young, 2015). This data may not in the form required for analysis and as such it is prudent to classify or segregate data into appropriate risk classification such as high likelihood of occurrence and low likelihood of occurrence. In addition it is important to observe the trend of the catastrophes happening and know whether there are certain catastphes that predisposes others from occurring. All this information will help in developing a sound and strong insurance cover for either a single or multiple related and unrelated occurrences. Using conditional probability method which postulates that the likelihood of an event occurring is conditional to the occurrence of prior event occurring it is possible to estimate the likelihood of an event occurring and thus acquire a comprehensive cover that is cost effective (Aro, Djehiche & Löfdahl, 2015). In instances where the second event is dependent on the first event both events are utilized in the assessment of the risk and premium. Conditional probability is critical in exposure of due diligence efforts because an occurrence of one event may not necessarily result into an economic loss such as flood that does not carry away an insured car but only destroys uninsured fence (Bayraktar, Promislow & Young, 2015; Leguizamon, & Hammond, 2015).

To conclude, we can say that, risk is inevitable and some acts such as “Acts of God” cannot be prevented. In such a scenario, insurance coverage providing protection against damage caused by act of God require consideration of the dependency and independency of occurrence of “acts of God” in any given year when either one or more than one “acts of God” can materialize. Occurrence of an event may result into economic losses. If jointly occurring it may be impossible to appropriately apportion the losses to the specific “act of God” therefore it is important to secure any property against damage caused by an independent “act of God” or a combination of “Acts of God”.

References

Andrews, W. J., & White, J. E. (2017). Digital Due Diligence: Four Questions to Ensure Your      Organization Has the Right Cyber Insurance Coverage. Risk Management64(2), 30.

Aro, H., Djehiche, B., & Löfdahl, B. (2015). Stochastic modelling of disability insurance in a       multi-period framework. Scandinavian actuarial journal2015(1), 88-106.

Bayraktar, E., Promislow, S. D., & Young, V. R. (2015). Purchasing term life insurance to reach   a bequest goal: time-dependent case. North American Actuarial Journal19(3), 224-236.

Klein, G. (2016). Trying to make rational decisions while employing intuitive reasoning: a look at             the due-diligence process using the dual-system reasoning model. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management20(3-4), 214-234.

Leguizamon, J. S., & Hammond, G. W. (2015). Merit‐based college tuition assistance and the       conditional probability of in‐state work. Papers in Regional Science94(1), 197-218.

Reibstein, R. J., Petkun, L. B., & Rudolph, A. J. (2013). Hidden Due Diligence Risk in Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments: Independence Contractor Misclassification Often       Overlooked. Bus. L. Today, 1.

 

 

 

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?