-
.QUESTION’
Extra-Credit Opportunity #2
For the opportunity to add 3 extra-credit points to your final course grade, please watch the
following video of my interview with Matthew Lorenzen, the author of this week’s reading:
https://youtu.be/Drpd6udeNs0
Then, in a one-page formally-written response paper, please answer the following questions
about that video:
• What did Lorenzen make clear about his research focus and findings?
• Why did Lorenzen decide to conduct this research?
• According to Lorenzen, what are the strengths of his chosen research methods - and
what methodological changes could improve his research?
• According to Lorenzen, what are the potential next steps for anyone interested in
conducting similar research?Extra-Credit Opportunity #2
For the opportunity to add 3 extra-credit points to your final course grade, please watch the following video of my interview with Matthew Lorenzen, the author of this week’s reading: https://youtu.be/Drpd6udeNs0
Then, in a one-page formally-written response paper, please answer the following questions about that video:
- What did Lorenzen make clear about his research focus and findings?
- Why did Lorenzen decide to conduct this research?
- According to Lorenzen, what are the strengths of his chosen research methods - and what methodological changes could improve his research?
- According to Lorenzen, what are the potential next steps for anyone interested in conducting similar research?
Using Module 10’s extra-credit Assignments function, please submit your response paper by Module 10’s closing date: Saturday 11/7 at 11:59pm.
*As a reminder, you may only take advantage of one extra-credit opportunity: #1, #2, OR #3.
| Subject | Business | Pages | 3 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
-
Response Paper
Lorenzen research main focus was to study the mixed motives of unaccompanied child migrants from the Central American northern triangle (Traver, 2020). Lozerana made a move to research this topic during his postdoc period at USC University of Southern California, and after working as a consultant at Mexico's national population council. The research findings were based on a small survey on unaccompanied child migrants under Mexican immigration authorities' custody and child welfare services in Mexico.
Lorenzen was highly interested in reaching about unaccompanied child migrants since he had a unique background in immigration. Therefore, upon working at CONAPO, he realized that the company had an idea of researching unaccompanied child migrants, which remained the main determinant for his research. He reframed the idea to capture the sociological concept, presenting a complex topic about the research (mixed motives of unaccompanied child migrants from Central American northern triangle).
The method's main strength was based on the fact that the results will be more truthful and realistic. The participants were the actual victims of immigration, hence the possibility to provide honest answers was high. Lorenzen urges that if the methodology had shifted to in-depth interviews and a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods would have been better; however, the results presented through questionnaires were also impressive.
The potential next step presented by Lorenzen's research is the opportunity to determine the connection between mixed motives in migration and its difficulties in offering humanitarian protection. Researchers need to prove the connection between mixed motives and how it creates a challenge in granting asylum to immigrants. Lorenzen highlights that even though the research might be complicated, it has to be done. It is an important area that will determine the reality between theorizing aspects and what is encountered on the actual ground.
References
-
Traver, A. (2020). Extra Credit 2 Video [Video]. Retrieved on November 2, 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Drpd6udeNs0&feature=youtu.be
Related Samples
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color="#E02B20" divider_weight="2px" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width="10%" module_alignment="center" custom_margin="|||349px||"][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner use_custom_gutter="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px||" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="13px||16px|0px|false|false"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_blog fullwidth="off" post_type="project" posts_number="5" excerpt_length="26" show_more="on" show_pagination="off" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" header_font="|600|||||||" read_more_font="|600|||||||" read_more_text_color="#e02b20" width="100%" custom_padding="|||0px|false|false" border_radii="on|5px|5px|5px|5px" border_width_all="2px" box_shadow_style="preset1"][/et_pb_blog][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type="1_4" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_sidebar orientation="right" area="sidebar-1" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|-3px||||"][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built="1" specialty="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_padding="0px|0px|0px|||"][et_pb_column type="3_4" specialty_columns="3" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="28px|||||"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"]-
QUESTION
Week 4 Discusssion
This is a discussion question that I need answered. I need the second portion of the questioned answered thoroughly, both bullet points. I have highlighted it in yellow to show that it is what I need answered. I need this r returned to me completed without any grammatical or punctual errors. The company that I want this question written about is Nissan Motor Corporation.
Choose ONE of the following discussion question options to respond to:
Using Adverse Conditions to a Company's Advantage
- Chakravorti (2010) discusses four methods that corporate innovators use to turn adverse conditions to their advantage. Examine an organization of your choice and briefly discuss how the organization might use one of these methods.
-OR-
Assessing Risk and Reward
- Using the company of your choice, identify an important and difficult decision that they faced. What were the most important risks and the most important rewards of the decision?
- What data, analysis or perspective would you have used to help Sr. Management decide if the rewards outweighed the risks?
| Subject | Business | Pages | 4 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
Assessing Risk and Reward
The Nissan Motor Company is one of the leading automobile makers in the world. The Japanese carmaker has primarily enjoyed a successful run, allowing it to enter various regional and international markets such as the United States. However, the changing business environment was not favorable to the company in 2019. Notably, the cooperation recorded losses amounting to 7.8%. The experience pushed the management into making tough decisions, requiring almost all of its North American workforce to go for unpaid leaves.
In late 2019, the company announced that the decline in sales necessitated a two-day unpaid leave for the North American workers. The stated days for the vacation were January 2 and 3rd (Chicago Tribune, 2019). Notably, this move was a crucial decision for the company because of its conflicting impacts. Whereas on the positive side, it could help the firm minimize expenses, it threatened to affect the public perception of the company regarding employee welfare.
The rewards for the decision involved cutting expenses by not paying the workers on leave, which eventually would translate into reduced expenses. Another reward was that the decision could allow the company to optimize performance by evaluating employee performances then developing new milestones. However, on the low side, the company risked affecting its public image and brand name, especially in the North American market. As per Chakravorti (2010), the way an organization treats its employees influences the firm's public perception. Thus, Nissan risked eliciting a negative public perception. With a distorted public image, the company could fail to revive its declining sales.
I would have advised the management of Nissan to utilize the Predictive Analytic perspective in determining the right decision to take. Ideally, the approach tries to predict what might happen in the future if particular decisions or actions are undertaken at the moment (Traymbak & Aggarwal, 2019). Looking at the situation at Nissan, the company needed to develop a goal such as increasing sales. After that, they would have made decisions aimed at realizing the set goal. In this regard, the predicted outcome could give the management an overview of whether more risks existed or significant rewards could be realized.
.
References
-
Leeson, R. (2003). Ideology and the International Economy: The Decline and Fall of Bretton Woods. Springer.