-
.QUESTION
Final Essay
Write a 5-8 page (1250-2000 words) essay that fulfills this task:
"You are an assistant to the President's Chief of Staff. The Sec of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs just delivered a memo to the President outlining options for a post-ISIS Iraq and Syria. The only option recommended by the National Security Advisor requires the deployment of between 8,000 and 10,000 US troops to northern Iraq and western Syria to act as a buffer between the various Kurdish factions in Syria and Iraq, and the combined forces of the Assad regime and Turkey to the north, and the Iranian-supported Iraqi militias to the south. This option wasn't necessarily the first choice of the CJCS or Joint Staff. Assume that the deployment of troops is deemed necessary by the President.
The Chief of Staff has asked you to build the strategy for generating domestic political support for the operation. Using your knowledge of the policy making process, the key actors, and formal and informal constraints and limitations, explain the most critical components of this strategy. You are not asked to evaluate the operation's utility nor assess its chances for success."
This is not a research paper and does not require reviewing material not included in the course.
| Subject | Essay Writing | Pages | 9 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
Final Essay
To: The President's Chief of Staff
From: Assistant to the President's Chief of Staff
Date:
Subject: Strategy for generating domestic political support operation
This brief provides strategic planning for the National Security Advisory on the pending deployment of 8000-10,000 US troops in response to ongoing Northern Iraq and Western Syria civil action. With a review of the political response to civil wars of controlling the economy, the essential fight for freedom has always been elaborate support to regional alignment and smooth economic transition. Given the 8000-10,000 US troops deployed in the warring region of northern Iraq and Western Syria, strategic planning is the key to offer a roadmap to final victory. However, there is a need to assume that strategic planning to get into the battlefield is still not attained. In this memo, three winning strategies for generating domestic political support for the operation will be provided to offer critical tactics for entry into the battleground. Among the three methods offered are:
Battle management application use policy: for offering language to control battle and aiding decision for situations.
The Policy of applying terahertz electronically enabled devices enhances the speed of attack and the sensitivity of oncoming attack devices.
Policy for applying rays that are coherent aided by laser: offering output beam instead of additional lesser in adverse battlegrounds.
Policymaking process
While there have been considerations for putting in place laws and policies for National Security Advisory, some guidelines have created confusion by failing to outline players' roles. To ensure that effective policies are developed for US troop management, an outline for their development considers five aspects. The first is to view sensitive information and critical systems used by the defense team to convey messages. This will help outline the critical system management and control of receiving and dispatching information from the system. The next move to develop policies is by incorporating federal, state, and local laws with acceptable ethical practices in the military actions. To offer broader considerations to the locals, some morals can be modified from the Department of Homeland Security and the National defense ethical practices.
In our policymaking process, the definition of security goals and objectives forms the basis of understanding the deployment's expected mission. Though applying this move, we will ensure that families and soldiers have local support for involvement in war and control of essential resources and economic zones. Further, our planning will require outlining how different milestones are accomplished and incorporating policies to ensure maximum technology use. Just before settling for these policies to be developed, all mechanisms for the troop to attain goals and objectives will be in place to meet the required task within outlined timelines.
At the end of the policy planning session, risk assessment on the technology troop enabled system will be undertaken to identify several factors for battle management efficiency, application of terahertz devices, and coherent lesser tools. Among considerations to be offered include providing policy roles, development, and approval through the President of the US and sustainability of outlined policies.
The key actors
The policymaking process in strategy for generating domestic political support operation involves official and unofficial policymakers. The unofficial policymakers include individuals who do not hold offices in public offices but are key players in the decision making and defense system management. Individuals involved in this process have application developers and other Information Technology (IT) experts who form part of foreign troops deployed to Iran and Syria and manage the states' critical infrastructure. From the information provided by these unofficial actors, the presidential mandate on defense is developed from harnessed demand and recommendations on how policies can meet local political needs while addressing the battleground issues.
The official Policy makes for this technology-enabled system includes individuals under primary and supplementary policymakers. Generally, the official policymakers are outlined in the constitution to take part in the national defense strategic planning to outline how activities conducted in the battleground matches the domestic political interest, among the authorized policymakers in applying cyber defense issues, the President of US, personal assistants and the Senate as well as other staffs within the political alignment to evaluate the proposal on strategic planning for adopting battle management application use, terahertz electronic devices, and coherent lesser application policies.
Supplementary policymakers ensure additional considerations for domestic support in defense strategy. Among these supplementary policymakers are government agencies and departments such as Homeland Security to ensure that proposed international operations policies align with the local defense strategies.
Formal constraints
Although strategies have been formulated and adopted in response to the international military operation, several constraints have also been associated with different policies. Among critical conditions faced include the era of George Bush and the Obama administration. Thus formulation of our systems to incorporate technology in military operation for Kurdish and Assad functions outlines a planning guide to address the previously faced limitation. Therefore, this process begins by identifying the President's disparities and the Senate's lack of corporation in the policy development process. The President will be required to assess the current wars' political interest in Syria and Iraq and respond by changing outlines for a response from the previously used strategies.
On the other hand, the Senate expresses concerns on passing legislation to address troop actions and deployment in a given region. Unlike in the past, when local complaints included exclusion from the policy formulation process, the current response will involve the Senate advisory collected within a stipulated period followed by a presidential mandate to authorize operations to Syria and Iraq's warring regions. Considerations to define roles of the House of Representatives and the executive will ensure the effectiveness of cyber-enabled military actions. Typically, a decision made by the executive is a collection of public opinions on defense delivered by the House of Representatives from public participation.
Our party has local support from the public, who are willing to support its operations to support military interests. The House of Representatives thus has the power to seek public views on policy development to improve security actions by the network information system.
Informal constraints
Government agencies and departments help in the creation of local political alignment for international military actions. However, when there is less involvement of the informal actors, technology-enabled laws and policies reduce the troop actions. The use of software for battle management will require informal actors to design and interpret languages conveyed by the battleground troops. Using the department of Homeland Security and the National Security Council, the informal actor's views will be collected through humanitarian organizations then a discussion is held to select the most critical issues that will enable application development and programming. The language applied will thus be interpreted within a given time and effectively understood by all.
Secondly, the electronic terahertz device's operation will be guided by policies to enhance its speed and sensitivity. Using the unofficial developers’ inputs to design the system, including system communication, interception, and system guidance will be outlined in the Policy. On the other hand, the electronic devices will have the procedure to select machines with higher signal emission and reception to the final users.
The previously used policies for lesser diodes proved efficient in managing battle ground situated in Asian zones. In response to Syria and Iraq military operations, the Policy to enhance efficiency will outline specifications for power levels of 100-2000 Watts of the energy flux emitted for the next four year period that our party will be addressing security concerns. Additional modifications to be outlined in the Policy for increased efficiency are applied technology to use thousands of diodes linked to coherent rays. In the long run, the system will give a waste management approach to ensure that high-power operations are within the specified target and limited traced to enemies on the battlefield.
Limitation
The selected technologies in managing the battlefield require a follow-up method to increase the outcome of activities performed. Therefore, policies for follow up will include the ability of terahertz devices evaluation of enemy plans, surveillance on the enemy, and recognition of forces applied by the enemy. When the data is gathered, the Policy will also protect such critical information while only outlining channels of giving outcomes and how the enemy has been attacked. Following blocks to computers data collection and analysis, Policy to increase speed will ensure additional data collected about the enemy.
The second considerations that need to be taken alongside terahertz devices are the management of battlegrounds and languages to be applied. The Policy will also focus on selecting demos and evaluating alternatives, using accurate and reliable information to issue the command on the attack weapons, and using an analytical framework to give real training modules to the troops to respond to enemy moves. From such actions from the network system, the troops will extract information from raw data and system automated decision of attack and retreat moves.
Effectiveness of technologically enhanced military approaches by use of lesser rays requires policies on potential application. The selection procedure will be discussed and passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate to ensure domestic support. The public will be required to offer their views on anti-sensor weapons to attack the enemy, infrared illuminators, and eye sensors to identify the enemy range. The House of Representatives and the Senate will give a foundation for presidential order to limit critics that may arise following political action.
Critical components of this strategy
The military operation, especially in hostile foreign environments like Syria and Iran, requires an outline of outlined critical strategies. In this case, the first component that will be considered is outlining a vision for generating domestic political support operation. The concept of this military mission will be to create peace and ensure smooth life continuity for all. At the end of this operation, the intention will be to secure economic resources by offering protection to resources. In designing this Policy, both primary and secondary actors will understand technology's operational mission and role in addressing foreign military issues. Further, the operations will seek to protect soldiers and increase survival rates at the end of four years.
The next critical component is the formulation of a mission statement to guide strategic planning. Given Americans' political interest and the party's objectives, this military operation's mission will be: To secure the future of Americans and support a better heal economy and free movement. Considering these components, the House of Representatives will collect views from the public using government agencies and other federal bodies seeking society's well-being. This move will help in grating domestic support on political involvement and technology used to conduct military operations in Iraq and Syria.
The third critical component outlines the goals and objectives of the political authorization of military actions to Syria and Iraq. Under short-term interventions, this Policy will include the suppression of Assad and Kurdish militia activities in the warring regions. On the other hand, the long-term goals will be to restore peace to the areas and secure the US's political future to protect citizens' lives. The main objective will be to bring peace and protect the economic resources of United States citizens.
Our action plan forms the final stage of securing the future of America using military interventions. Therefore, different stakeholders in this operation will be designated duties and time allocations to execute their policy development roles. By the end of this operation, the critical objective, mission, and vision of deploying US troops will be attained, and the party will remain relevant in meeting its roles.
In conclusion, strategic planning will begin with the battle management application use policy to offer language to control battles and aid situations. Secondly, I recommend applying terahertz electronically enabled devices enhances the speed of attack and the sensitivity of oncoming attack devices followed by the Policy for applying rays that are coherent aided by laser: offering output beam instead of additional lesser in adverse battlegrounds. This will help our country in responding to the ongoing militia actions in Syria and Iraq.