Q.1 Write a reply for this discussion
Value-based consideration is a type of repayment that attaches installments for care conveyance to the nature of care given and compensates suppliers for both proficiency and adequacy. This type of repayment has arisen as another option and possible trade for expense for administration repayment, which pays suppliers reflectively for administrations conveyed dependent on charge charges or yearly expense plans. To improve whereby medicinal services suppliers do return during treatments performed, the Places for Federal health insurance and Medicaid Administrations (CMS) has presented a variety of significant worth-based consideration models, for example, the Government medical care Shared Investment Funds Program and Pioneer Responsible Consideration Association (ACO) Model. Private payers have this way, received comparable models of responsible, esteem-based consideration. While the customary charge-for-administration repayment model advanced the number of administrations, government authorities have proposed a few repayment programs that reward medical care suppliers for the nature of care that they provide for patients. Worth-based consideration means to propel the triple point of giving better consideration to people, improving populace well-being through the executive’s methodologies, and decreasing medical care costs.
Nowicki, M. (2018). Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations. Chicago: HAP.
MGMT
Q.2 Write a reply for this Discussion
A group of people called to court for jury duty (often by a jury summons) are interrogated by attorneys and occasionally judges before a jury is chosen. Questioning is known as “voir dire,” which translates to “to speak the truth.” The basic goal of voir dire is to select jurors who can listen to the evidence objectively and render a decision that is consistent with the law. By demonstrating that the person can’t be fair or won’t follow the law, an attorney can utilize a “challenge for cause” to remove them from the jury. In most jurisdictions, attorneys are also permitted a set number of “peremptory” challenges—a fancy way of stating they can remove someone from the jury without providing a reason. Many judges will only question a specific number of prospective jurors at a time during voir dire. The remaining potential jurors could observe the voir dire of that group while waiting nearby. Each party may cross-examine any members of the group they do not want to serve on the jury following the questioning. Those series of question can vary depending on the ongoing case.
References: How do they select jurors for jury duty? | lawyers.com. (n.d.-a). https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/criminal/criminal-law-basics/the-process-of-questioning-potential-jurors.html/
Q.3 What is the purpose of the Statute of Fraud? What exactly does it include?
