Globalization and explore it through the four general education interdisciplinary lenses

  select an issue or event in globalization and explore it through the four general education interdisciplinary lenses. By viewing the issue/event through these lenses, you will gain insight into how the interconnected nature of globalization affects society. The four general education interdisciplinary lenses are history, humanities, natural and applied sciences, and social science. History is the study of the past and its connection to the present. It encompasses content, memories, and events situated in time. Humanities is the study of cultures’ creative expression and contemplates metaphor, experience, and meaning. Natural and applied sciences study the material world grounded in the scientific method. Social sciences study human relationships and social structures grounded in demographic and statistic measurements. When we look at an event in our lives, we often jump between different frameworks to make sense of it. For instance, if we attend a music concert we might move from an artistic lens (How did they create the musical score?) to a technical lens (How does all the lighting work?) to a financial lens (How much money do the performers earn?). Similarly, looking through the general education interdisciplinary lenses can help us see things from other perspectives by giving us a conscious way to analyze them, helping to broaden our perspective. This assignment prepares you to choose a topic and lens for your project by first applying all four lenses. Before completing this activity, review the Project Guidelines and Rubric to know exactly what you will be working on. You may still change your choice of topic until the next module. write a short paper on a globalization topic of your choice. It could be a topic related to globalization that you have personally experienced or that you are interested in knowing more about. Review the module resources and visit the IDS 401 Library Guide for guidance on selecting and narrowing a topic. After selecting your topic, do some preliminary research to ensure that you can address the required elements of your project. In your paper, you must apply each lens to your topic by using its language and perspectives. You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking and writing. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Describe your existing knowledge about your topic in globalization. You might describe your personal experience with the topic, what you learned in school, or what your assumptions are about the topic. Ask, what do I know (or think I know)? Apply the history lens to your topic. Using the language of history as it is defined in your resources and academic journals, how would you write about your topic? What events and dates have occurred that are important to your topic? Has the significance of the topic diminished or shifted with time? Who are the authors of the historical record(s) related to your topic?

Sample Solution

History Lens: The history of climate change can be traced back to the industrial revolution in the nineteenth century and earlier when humans began to burn fossil fuels on a large scale. This release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere has led to an increase in global temperatures, altering weather patterns and causing negative environmental consequences. As more is learned about this phenomenon, it is increasingly clear that its effects are already being felt across multiple regions around the world. For example, melting icecaps have caused rising sea levels which threaten coastal cities like Miami, while severe droughts have impacted agricultural production in California. It is essential to study these changes over time so that we can better understand them and develop solutions for mitigating their impact on our societies.        
Overall, jus in bello suggests in wars, harm can only be used against combatants, never against the innocent. But in the end, the aim is to establish peace and security within the commonwealth. As Vittola’s conclusion: ‘the pursuit of justice for which he fights and the defence of his homeland’ is what nations should be fighting for in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332). Thus, although today’s world has developed, we can see not much different from the modernist accounts on warfare and the traditionists, giving another section of the theory of the just war. Nevertheless, we can still conclude that there cannot be one definitive theory of the just war theory because of its normativity.

Jus post bellum

Finally, jus post bellum suggests that the actions we should take after a war (Frowe (2010), Page 208). Firstly, Vittola argues after a war, it is the responsibility of the leader to judge what to do with the enemy (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Again, proportionality is emphasised. For example, the Versailles treaty imposed after the First World War is questionably too harsh, as it was not all Germany’s fault for the war. This is supported by Frowe, who expresses two views in jus post bellum: Minimalism and Maximalism, which are very differing views. Minimalists suggest a more lenient approach while maximalist, supporting the above example, provides a harsher approach, punishing the enemy both economically and politically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last instance, however, the aim of war is to establish peace security, so whatever needs to be done can be morally justified, if it follows the rules of jus ad bellum. In conclusion, just war theory is very contestable and can argue in different ways. However, the establishment of a just peace is crucial, making all war type situation to have different ways of approaching (Frowe (2010), Page 227). Nevertheless, the just war theory comprises of jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it can be either morally controversial or justifiable depending on the proportionality of the circumstance. Therefore, there cannot be one definitive theory of the just war but only a theoretical guide to show how wars should be fought, showing normativity in its account, which answers the question to what a just war theory is.