In “Automation,” Adam Greenfield argues that automation will have a significant impact on labor. In the most extreme circumstances, automation
technologies will eliminate human workers. However, Greenfield argues that we should understand automation to also include those technologies that more
simply reduce the need for workers. In such a context, workers will be asked to do more, for lower wages, under more precarious conditions, at a higher pace.
Discuss in detail Greenfield’s argument defending the claim that automation will make work and working conditions worse. Use examples from the real world
to exemplify Greenfield’s argument.
Sample Solution
Adam Greenfield’s argument defending the claim that automation will make work and working conditions worse is based on an understanding of the technology as more than a replacement for human labor. Rather, Greenfield claims that automation technologies “amplify existing inequalities by deepening the power imbalance between employers and employees,” leading to workers being asked to do more for lower wages, under more precarious conditions, at a higher pace.
To illustrate this point, Greenfield cites examples such as Amazon warehouses where workers are constantly monitored through tracking software which records their speed and performance in real-time. In other words, employers can control what should be done and how it should be done while measuring employee performance in order to ensure they meet certain standards, often at low cost or no cost to them. This type of surveillance amplifies existing
Sample Solution
Adam Greenfield’s argument defending the claim that automation will make work and working conditions worse is based on an understanding of the technology as more than a replacement for human labor. Rather, Greenfield claims that automation technologies “amplify existing inequalities by deepening the power imbalance between employers and employees,” leading to workers being asked to do more for lower wages, under more precarious conditions, at a higher pace.
To illustrate this point, Greenfield cites examples such as Amazon warehouses where workers are constantly monitored through tracking software which records their speed and performance in real-time. In other words, employers can control what should be done and how it should be done while measuring employee performance in order to ensure they meet certain standards, often at low cost or no cost to them. This type of surveillance amplifies existing