-
QUESTION
LGBTIA health
I need 3 pages and 4 sources
APA format, scholarly articles within 5 years
The Healthy People 2020 assignment paper topic is LGBTIA health
The health Issue on the assignment is Health People 2020 topic LGBTI healthWeek 2: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper
Submit Assignment
- Points 125
- Submitting a file upload
Purpose
The concepts of epidemiology provide the framework for the study of infectious and chronic health issues/diseases, which provides a rich source of data for the analysis of trends in disease and health. This assignment will offer the learner the opportunity to explore the population health effects of a topic which will be assigned by your course faculty.
As an example, you may be asked to identify populations at risk for oral health issues or, for instance, issues related to the frail living at home, and design a population health focused educational intervention for your target population.
In addition, you will look at what outcomes will be addressed to determine if your interventions are effective. This paper should integrate HP2020 and CDC information into your paper.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
- Identify appropriate outcome measures and study designs applicable to epidemiological sub-fields such as infectious disease, chronic disease, environmental exposures, reproductive health, and genetics. (CO3)
- Identify important sources of epidemiological data. (CO6)
Total Points Possible: 125
Requirements
Requirements
- Research Topic: Your course faculty will supply you with a topic for this assignment.
- Identify your target population (for instance, age or other demographic, aggregate population); this must be in your city or state.
- Discuss population-based health education interventions for your target population that is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality for the problem. Be sure to review the research literature and HP2020 for interventions.
- Identify how and what data for interventions is being tracked.
- In a three to four pages paper, address the following. Refer to rubric for expanded details related to grading expectations.
- Identify the problem in the introduction section.
- Provide an overview of the problem in your state/national.
- Review of descriptive epidemiological and demographic data on mortality/morbidity and risk.
- HP2020: Present the goal, overview, and objectives of Healthy People 2020 for the paper topic.
- Population level prevention and health promotion review. Describe population and/or primary health care focused interventions. Use of scholarly literature and HP2020 is required. There should be direct correlation to evidence for all strategies.
Best Practices in Preparing the Project
- Review directions and rubric through carefully.
- Follow submission requirements.
- Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included. Organize the paper using the rubric sections and appropriate headings to match the sections.
- Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
- Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
- Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
- A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature references must be used. Not all references should be from scholarly web sites. You may use your textbook, but this will not count towards the three (3) scholarly literature references.
- Length: Papers not adhering to the page length may be returned to you for editing to meet the length guidelines.
- Adhere to the Chamberlain College of Nursing academic policy on integrity as it pertains to the submission of your own original work for assignments.
Rubric
NR503_HP2020_Sept19
NR503_HP2020_Sept19
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 100 Points
Introduction of the Problem (no heading)
1. Problem is clearly stated.
2. General introduction to the problem supports its importance as a population health issue with data and general statement of scope of problem.
3. Focus of the paper is stated succinctly.
(3 critical elements)
5.0 pts
Excellent
All bullet items (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation, by evidence.
4.0 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
3.0 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Problem is unsupported 4. Writing is largely unsupported
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion: Overview, Background and Significance of the Problem
1. Provide background and significance of the problem.
2. This includes risks and impact of disease.
3. Data: State and National: Incidence, prevalence, mortality, breakdown by gender/race/religion as appropriately related
(3 critical elements)
25.0 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence.
23.0 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
21.0 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
12.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEpidemiological Analysis of the Problem
1. Using descriptive epidemiology (provide description of term) analyze health problem
2. Include demographic and related epidemiological data
3. Include characteristics of at-risk population using HP2020 specified criteria
(3 critical elements)
30.0 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence
27.0 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
25.0 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
15.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of HP 2020
1. Identify HP2020 goals and objectives
2. Relate HP2020 goals and objectives to health concern topic
3. Identify guidelines and a screening method related to health concern
4. Review validity (predictive power) of screening tool method to include what population the tool is applicable to use with (for instance, adult, child, culture)
(4 critical elements)
20.0 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence
18.0 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
17.0 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
10.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePopulation Level Planning Interventions
1. Investigate what is being done at the population health level related to prevention and health promotion for the health problem at the national and state level
2. Identify what and how outcomes are being tracked related to said interventions.
3. Utilize HP2020, CDC, state public health department, research, etc. as resources for interventions and data.
(3 critical elements)
20.0 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence
18.0 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
17.0 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
10.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 25 Points
APA
1. All content accurately utilizes APA format for citations and table formatting per APA current edition.
2. Reference list is formatted per APA current edition.
Cover page, running heads, font size and type, reference list and headings per APA current ed.
15.0 pts
Excellent
No APA errors
14.0 pts
V. Good
1-2 APA errors
12.0 pts
Satisfactory
3-4 APA errors
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement
5-6 APA errors
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
7 or more APA errors
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling
1. Grammar, writing voice, and spelling are in accordance with APA 6th edition.
2. Scientific prose/voice is consistent.
3. Writing has precision and clarity
4. See APA 6th edition, 3, Writing Clearly and Concisely
10.0 pts
Excellent
Written work is free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
9.0 pts
V. Good
Written work is largely free of grammatical, spelling or syntax errors. (Approximately 1-2).
8.0 pts
Satisfactory
Written work includes some grammatical, spelling or syntax errors that distract the reader. (Approximately 3-4).
5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Written work contains numerous grammatical, spelling or syntax errors that distract the reader (Approximately 5-6).
0.0 pts
Unsatisfactory
7 or more errors
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0.0 pts
Deduction of points
0.0 pts
Deduction of points
0.0 pts
Total Points: 125.0
Discussion topic: describe the diagnostic or screening tool selected, its purpose, and what age group it targets. Choose from one of the following tests:
- Genetic Testing: Colon, Prostate, Breast Cancer (choose one)
- Fall Risk Screening Tools ( to help identify at riskpatients aged 65 and over, such as Mobility Interaction Scale)
- NAAT Screening Test for Chlamydia
Healthy People 2020 Paper topic is:
LGBTIA Health
Guidelines for what to include in these all are in WEEK 2 modules.
| Subject | Nursing | Pages | 13 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
-
LGBTIA Health
Healthcare providers' concern is on the well-being of society, focusing on people of all ages. Consequently, the focus is on meeting the goals of Healthy People 2020 (HP2020), where the lesbians, gays, and bisexual and transgender (LGBT) individuals are considered in ensuring that they can manage rising health concerns. However, some health conditions such as infectious diseases or genetic disorders have negatively affected the goals of providing better health to society. This paper will review breast cancer patients aged 65 years and above on how they are affected by this condition leading to the slow attainment of HP 2020 goals. Further, the paper will provide insight into the education interventions to manage data on individuals' wellness within this study group.
About the Oxford University statistics, breast cancer is the second most fatal disease in the US that has claimed 10 million lives in the past two years. Generally, this condition is known to affect all gender, but according to this data, this condition was reported to be adverse among lesbians, while gays have reported an increasing trend in the same study period (MacGowan et al. 2019). Statistics conducted in selected cities of Ohio, Minnesota, and Maryland indicate that the most vulnerable in these regions express up to about 60% of the total number of individuals infected. Additional research by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), both black and white females are affected by cancer at the same rates while blacks' mortality rates tend to be higher than the whites. The reasons behind these trends are traced back to age, lifestyle, and financial ability to access better health care. Community creation of awareness and campaigns are recommended as the best practices to attain the themes of HP 2020 and its agenda.
The CDC's data indicate that breast cancer the most common disease among US women, with a rate of three victims for every ten women screened for the condition. Based on this trend, the year 2019 was characterized by 268,600 cases reported in 2019, while the males had reported only 2,670 cases, which are much lower than women. The report shows that the positivity rate for breast cancer is at 13% among the females, while for the males, it is at about 2.8 positivity rate (Pagahiannis et al., 2019). The most devastating trend of this condition is that from the total cases reported, women have the highest mortality rate of 42,000 annually while their male counterparts had 15 deaths from the disease (Henley et al. 2020). This trend is because of a lack of awareness of preventive and management measures for LGBT health management concerns.
Although breast cancer has claimed several lives in society, the HP 2020 goals provide four primary points to achieve its mandates. According to HP 2020, society needs individuals with high-quality lives, low mortality rates, and the ability to manage preventable health conditions (de Souto Barreto et al., 2020). Secondly, the goals seek to promote equality in accessing health services, reduce disparity, and improve health among all social groups. Thirdly, Healthy People 2020 goals are focused on improving the human environment to facilitate good health and effective management of health conditions. While oral health is a center of focus in HP 2020, chronic illness is also given equal consideration based on society's effects. The general objective is to prevent and manage chronic conditions among individuals by improving access to services and creating an enabling environment that treats and helps manage the individuals faced with these diseases.
Age is becoming a significant challenge for the management of chronic conditions among individuals in modern society. To address challenges the elderly face in meeting the HP 2020 goals, there is a need to develop a strategic approach that will promote better healthcare goals and objectives (Pereira et al., 2020). Firstly, there is a need to review the existing interventions used to manage these conditions among individuals aged 65 years and above. Secondly, there is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of a given intervention in system adaptability to the target group and prevent mortality rates when this condition is faced. In designing a better intervention approach, there is a need to consider a method that includes both health promotion and chronic disease control mechanisms that will eventually ensure that an individual has relevant knowledge on what they are suffering from and the need to practice a healthy lifestyle while understanding that all conditions can be managed. Thus, health education, behavior control, and proper communication between caregivers and the elderly affected by chronic conditions need to be adequately addressed to attain the objectives of HP 2020. In conclusion, Healthy People 2020 covers a population of different types of people and entails a mixed method that addresses various issues related to a chronic condition.
Reference
Henley, S. J., Thomas, C. C., Lewis, D. R., Ward, E. M., Islami, F., Wu, M., ... & Kohler, B. A. (2020). Annual report to the nation on cancer status, part II: Progress toward Healthy People 2020 objectives for four common cancers. Cancer, 126(10), 2250-2266.
McGowan, A. K., Kramer, K. T., & Teitelbaum, J. B. (2019). Healthy People: the role of law and policy in the nation's public health agenda. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(2_suppl), 63-67.
Pahigiannis, K., Thompson-Paul, A. M., Barfield, W., Ochiai, E., Loustalot, F., Shero, S., & Hong, Y. (2019). Progress Toward Improved Cardiovascular Health in the United States: Healthy People 2020 Heart Disease and Stroke Objectives. Circulation, 139(16), 1957-1973.
Pereira, L., Asrar, G. R., Fisher, L. H., Hsu, A., Nel, J., Sitas, N., ... & Malone, T. (2019). Bottom-up Initiatives and Participatory Approaches for Outlooks-Global Environment Outlook (GEO-6): Healthy Planet, Healthy People Chapter 23. Global Environment Outlook (GEO-6): Healthy Planet, Healthy People.
De Souto Barreto, P., Guyonnet, S., Ader, I., Andrieu, S., Castilla, L., Davezac, N., ... & Parini, A. (2020). The INSPIRE research initiative: A program for geroscience and healthy aging research going from animal models to humans and the healthcare system. The Journal of Frailty & Aging, 1-8.
Related Samples
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color="#E02B20" divider_weight="2px" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width="10%" module_alignment="center" custom_margin="|||349px||"][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner use_custom_gutter="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px||" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="13px||16px|0px|false|false"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_blog fullwidth="off" post_type="project" posts_number="5" excerpt_length="26" show_more="on" show_pagination="off" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" header_font="|600|||||||" read_more_font="|600|||||||" read_more_text_color="#e02b20" width="100%" custom_padding="|||0px|false|false" border_radii="on|5px|5px|5px|5px" border_width_all="2px" box_shadow_style="preset1"][/et_pb_blog][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type="1_4" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_sidebar orientation="right" area="sidebar-1" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|-3px||||"][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built="1" specialty="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_padding="0px|0px|0px|||"][et_pb_column type="3_4" specialty_columns="3" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="28px|||||"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"]-
QUESTION
Week 4 Discusssion
This is a discussion question that I need answered. I need the second portion of the questioned answered thoroughly, both bullet points. I have highlighted it in yellow to show that it is what I need answered. I need this r returned to me completed without any grammatical or punctual errors. The company that I want this question written about is Nissan Motor Corporation.
Choose ONE of the following discussion question options to respond to:
Using Adverse Conditions to a Company's Advantage
- Chakravorti (2010) discusses four methods that corporate innovators use to turn adverse conditions to their advantage. Examine an organization of your choice and briefly discuss how the organization might use one of these methods.
-OR-
Assessing Risk and Reward
- Using the company of your choice, identify an important and difficult decision that they faced. What were the most important risks and the most important rewards of the decision?
- What data, analysis or perspective would you have used to help Sr. Management decide if the rewards outweighed the risks?
| Subject | Business | Pages | 4 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
Assessing Risk and Reward
The Nissan Motor Company is one of the leading automobile makers in the world. The Japanese carmaker has primarily enjoyed a successful run, allowing it to enter various regional and international markets such as the United States. However, the changing business environment was not favorable to the company in 2019. Notably, the cooperation recorded losses amounting to 7.8%. The experience pushed the management into making tough decisions, requiring almost all of its North American workforce to go for unpaid leaves.
In late 2019, the company announced that the decline in sales necessitated a two-day unpaid leave for the North American workers. The stated days for the vacation were January 2 and 3rd (Chicago Tribune, 2019). Notably, this move was a crucial decision for the company because of its conflicting impacts. Whereas on the positive side, it could help the firm minimize expenses, it threatened to affect the public perception of the company regarding employee welfare.
The rewards for the decision involved cutting expenses by not paying the workers on leave, which eventually would translate into reduced expenses. Another reward was that the decision could allow the company to optimize performance by evaluating employee performances then developing new milestones. However, on the low side, the company risked affecting its public image and brand name, especially in the North American market. As per Chakravorti (2010), the way an organization treats its employees influences the firm's public perception. Thus, Nissan risked eliciting a negative public perception. With a distorted public image, the company could fail to revive its declining sales.
I would have advised the management of Nissan to utilize the Predictive Analytic perspective in determining the right decision to take. Ideally, the approach tries to predict what might happen in the future if particular decisions or actions are undertaken at the moment (Traymbak & Aggarwal, 2019). Looking at the situation at Nissan, the company needed to develop a goal such as increasing sales. After that, they would have made decisions aimed at realizing the set goal. In this regard, the predicted outcome could give the management an overview of whether more risks existed or significant rewards could be realized.
.
References
-
Bertani, A., Di Paola, G., Russo, E., & Tuzzolino, F. (2018). How to describe bivariate data. Journal of thoracic disease, 10(2), 1133.
Palazzolo, D. (2018). Writing in the disciplines: Political science - Four steps for conducting bivariate analysis. University of Richmond Writing Center & WAC Program. https://writing2.richmond.edu/writing/wweb/polisci/bivariate2.html
Sims, R. L. (2000). Bivariate data analysis: A practical guide. Nova Publishers.
Zhang, Z. (2016). Univariate description and bivariate statistical inference: the first step delving into data. Annals of translational medicine, 4(5).