{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
    1. QUESTION

    Management of Marketing Channels

    Group Report

    Winter 2019 Report

    Part 2

    Company Assessment & Recommendations

    Marking Outline

     

    Due:   Noon April 12th – submitted through Safe Assign.

    In Class Presentations on April 9th

     

    Company Overview                                                                                       (Total of 20 marks)   

    • Firm’s overall mission and strategy (usually on the firm’s website, under “Investor Relations”)
    • Market segments served (B2C, B2B, geographic, demographic, psychographic, and / or behaviouristic)
    ¨      Flow of physical goods ( charts are helpful)
    ¨      Overview of firm’s channel structure, SOD’s (Service Output Demand) and SOS’s (Service Output Supply)
    • SOD’s look forward into the channel in terms of what outputs (i.e. specific services and/or channel functions) are being demanded by channel members à what do your channel members want
    • SOS’s look backward into the channel in terms of what outputs (i.e. specific services and/or channel functions) are being provided to channel members à what are you doing for your channel members
    • The difference between SOD’s (what is being asked for/expected by channel members) and SOS’s (what is being given) is a Service ‘Gap’ which is an opportunity to create an even better fit supply-demand relationship
    • See separate file “Service Output Demands and Services” for further explanation
    • GAP Analysis resulting from analysis of channel structure, SOD’s and SOS’s

     

     

    Channel Power                                                                                                 (Total of 20 marks)

    • Analysis of each of type of channel power for your selected firm and its channel members. Power analysis not required for competitive companies, just your company (product or product group)
    • For each type of power, analyse the firm’s source of that power, if any, then analyse each major channel member type’s source of that power
    • Once that is completed, determine who has the most power for each type of power and overall (ie…all the power doesn’t reside with the manufacturer, channel members can control more power sometimes through size, geographic coverage, image, etc.)
    • See the separate file “Project Part 2 Power Table” for a sample.

     

    Short-Term Fix Identification                                                                                         (Total of 25 marks)

    • The idea is to copy, adapt, improve on competitors’ valuable channel ideas or opportunities that become apparent after your analysis (either functional or demand driven)
    • For each of the two competitors, evaluate each channel difference (if there are any differences) that you identified in Project Report Part I, to determine if:
    • Your firm would benefit from implementing this idea
    • If the idea would be a low-risk change. A low-risk change does not require a large up-front cost (such as building a warehouse, or manufacturing facility) and, if unsuccessful, can be dropped without a major expense
    • Beyond your competitor analysis are there any environmental issues (outside influences like the economy, government regulation, technology, political etc. – also literal environmental changes could fall under government legislation (packaging legislation), or societal changes (consumer driven) that require any channel adjustments/improvements that could provide your firm with a competitive advantage.
     

     

    Designing the Ideal Channel                                                                              

    • The ideal channel is the most effective way of satisfying most of your customers’ needs. (It would not necessarily be a final channel design that a firm would implement because you will not have accounted for contractual exceptions/obligations that might exist nor the preferences of management.)

     

    • Ideal Channel Design                                                                                        (30 marks)
    • Match customer needs, lowest possible cost, core competency, potential for creation of a strategic/competitive advantage
    • Use customer needs analysis (above) plus what you learned about channel design (above)
    • A graphic of the ideal channel structure is required
    • A complete rationale on why this is the ideal channel design

     

     

    Professionalism And Formatting                                                                              (Total of 10 marks)   

    • Readability, formatting, index, headings, flow, etc.
    • Inclusion of all references and appropriate footnotes
    • The absence of MLA citations and references to ALL external sources of information constitutes plagiarism. Be sure that in-text citations are included throughout your document.
    • Interviews should be noted with the interviewee’s name, title, organization, and date of interview.
    • Appendices as required.
    • Project Report Part I to be included as an appendix

     

 

Subject Report Writing Pages 12 Style APA

Answer

Dr. Pepper Channel Report

Company Overview

Mission and Strategy

Dr. Pepper’s overall mission is to be the best beverage business within the Americas. The firm’s brands are synonymous with flavor, fun, and refreshment for generations. The company’s strategic approaches involve establishing and enhancing its leading brands, pursuing profitable packages, categories, and channels, and leveraging the firm’s integrated business models (Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, 2017; Calia, 2014a). Besides, other strategic approaches include strengthening the company’s route to market and improving the operating efficiency (Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, 2017; Dr. Pepper Snapple Facility Under Way, 2008). Dr. Pepper’s strategic approaches are informed by core values such as accountability, customer-centric, own decisions, transparency and honesty, Inspect What We Expect, and no blame fixing (Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, 2017).

Segments

Even though the final customer is responsible for pulling demand for the beverage industry, retailers and distributors or bottlers constitute beverage firms’ direct customers (Leach, 2017; Calia, 2014b). Within the B2B space, Dr. Pepper’s direct customers are retailers such as Wal-Mart, Kroger, and Safeway. The firm also sells products to other business, particularly foodservice businesses such as Burger King, McDonalds and Yum! Dr. Pepper’s B2C space involves selling products directly to customers of all ages. The company’s products or brands such as Cherry Vanilla, Canada Dry, 7UP, A&W, and Sunkist Soda are targeted at different customers. For instance, Cherry Vanillas is highly preferred by individuals aged between 18 and 24 years (Discovery Research Group, 2014). A specific customer profile for such as product would appear as follows:

“Maria Donald”

  • 18-24 years old
  • Middle-upper class income (working class)
  • Lives in GTA

Flow of Physical Goods

Figure I: Flow of Physical Goods

Source: Author’s Drawing

 

Even though the figure above shows the flow of products and goods throughout the channel, Dr. Pepper often sells its products directly to retailers and foodservice businesses. It is also vital to note that the company has been depending on services of third-party distributors like PepsiCo Inc. and the Coca Cola Company. The Food and Beverage trade shows also provide an opportunity for the company to acquire potential channel partners.   

Service Output Demand (SOD)

Channel members within Canada’s beverage industry desire features such as on-time delivery and spatial convenience options. Considering the fast-paced nature, seasonality, and high product demand levels that characterize the industry, retailers and wholesalers demand that Dr. Pepper deliver beverages on time and often has adequate stock, particularly during warmer months, festive seasons and weekends.  Competitive companies such as Pepsi and Coca Cola are more effective in meeting these goals than Dr. Pepper (Leach, 2017; Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, 2014). For instance, the firm often seeks the services of these rivals when it comes to ensuring that products are delivered on time to final consumers.

Service Output Supply (SOS)

Dr. Pepper’s most significant SOS’s is its capability to establish and sustain robust associations with customers and partners within the channel. Dr. Pepper has robust relationships with channel members, especially retailers such as Wal-Mart, Safeway, Target, and Kroger Co, and major food services businesses like McDonalds and Yum! (Cleverism, 2019). These channel members enjoy warm working relationships with the firm, which often goes overboard to ensure comfort to channel members handling its products. The firm also provides assistance in promotion and offers advice to sellers within the retail space, particularly retailers such as Kroger, Safeway, Wal-Mart, and Target. In addition, Dr. Pepper provides warranties for product market channel members.

Gap Analysis

In relation to the analysis executed in the SOD and SOS sections, it can be noted that Dr. Pepper less effective in delivering products to consumers in time relative to its competitors such as Coca Cola and Pepsi, especially during warmer months, weekends, and festive seasons. The company’s presence in direct distribution is largely limited by its reliance on the services of third-party companies such as Pepsi and Coca Cola.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Power Analysis

Type of Power

Dr. Pepper Brands (e.g. 7UP, A&W, Canada Dry, Cherry Vanilla etc.)

Wholesalers (Distributors and Bottlers)

Retailer 1: Discount departmental stores such as Wal-Mart

Retailer 2: Grocery stores such as Kroger

Reward

·         Offers discounts for payments made it time

·         Offers various products for channel members or partners to sell

·         Provides help with physical and virtual advertisements and promotions

·         Sell products with push-approach retailers with the aim of increasing profits for Dr. Pepper

·         Provides warehousing, as well as support for storage of products during peak seasons

·         Have numerous stores that offer reasonable self-space for Dr. Pepper’s products

·         Sell products by employing the pull strategy or approach that increases profits for Dr. Pepper

 

 

 

·         Permit specialty display of Dr. Pepper’s products, as well as larger in-store ads

·         Offer more in-depth illustrations about various brands for customers, which in turn increases their understanding of such products

 

Balance of Power

·         Dr. Pepper possesses the greatest reward power owing to benefits it can offer for compliance. Granted that other members of the channel comply, there exist extremely limited rewards relative to what Dr. Pepper provides

 

 

 

Table I: Reward Power

 

Type of Power

Dr. Pepper Brands (e.g. 7UP, A&W, Canada Dry, Cherry Vanilla etc.)

Wholesalers (Distributors and Bottlers)

Retailer 1: Discount departmental stores such as Wal-Mart

Retailer 2: Grocery stores such as Kroger

Coercive

·         Has the ability to force entire portfolio of products in situations in which buyers attempt to select a single line of product

·         Has the ability to restrict distribution in situations where retailers and wholesalers do not adhere to their structure

 

 

 

·         Since Dr. Pepper depends on these channel members for warehousing, they can leverage this opportunity for selling extra space

·         Have links with retailers, which in turn give them the ability to force desires results from Dr. Pepper

·         Can restrict location or shelf-space

·         These stores possess robust coercive power owing to their extensive provisions along with enormous base of sellers

 

 

·         Lack coercive power owing to their size in relation to number of stores or sales volume per market share

 

 

 

 

Balance of Power

 

 

·         Discount departmental stores like Wal-Mart possess the greatest coercive power owing to volume of sales they offer. Many buyers make their purchases in these stores. In addition, these stores possess extensive networks across the country, North America, and Europe.

 

Table III: Coercive Power

 

 

Type of Power

Dr. Pepper Brands (e.g. 7UP, A&W, Canada Dry, Cherry Vanilla etc.)

Wholesalers (Distributors and Bottlers)

Retailer 1: Discount departmental stores such as Wal-Mart

Retailer 2: Grocery stores such as Kroger

Legitimate Power

·         Widespread distribution of products imply that that Dr. Pepper can restructure the channel in an easy manner

·         Controls payment, which in turn grants it the ability to demand cooperation during peak seasons

·         Owing to their warehousing role, wholesalers exist among the most points of Dr. Pepper’s distribution.

 

 

 

·         Considering their enormous size, these retailers are always perceived as the channel’s authority

·         Wal-Mart’s shelf-replenish and delivery policy is very strict

 

 

Lack legitimate power owing to their size

Balance of Power

 

 

·         Wal-Mart possesses the most legitimate power owing to the pronounced demand for commodities during festive seasons, warmer seasons, and weekends. The seasonality of the beverage business also offers these channel members with an opportunity for ore legitimate authority, as they contribute to a significant portion of Dr. Pepper’s sales 

 

Table III: Legitimate Power

 

 

Type of Power

Dr. Pepper Brands (e.g. 7UP, A&W, Canada Dry, Cherry Vanilla etc.)

Wholesalers (Distributors and Bottlers)

Retailer 1: Discount departmental stores such as Wal-Mart

Retailer 2: Grocery stores such as Kroger

Referent Power

·         Channel members have a likelihood of knowing Dr. Pepper’s reputation along with what it provides

·         Emerging retailers, particularly grocery stores such as Kroger prefer being associated with robust brands such as Dr. Pepper, as this gives them power

 

 

·         Lacks referent power

 

 

·         In the real sense, they prefer being linked to Dr. Pepper owing to its robust brand reputation

·         Robust reputation associated with the discount departmental stores such as Wal-Mart grants the power of influencing Dr. Pepper to adhere to their structure

 

 

Lacks referent power owing to the limited size

Balance of Power

·         Dr. Pepper ultimately possesses the referent power owing to its robust reputation along with the robust brand reputation associated with it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table IV: Referent Power

 

Type of Power

Dr. Pepper Brands (e.g. 7UP, A&W, Canada Dry, Cherry Vanilla etc.)

Wholesalers (Distributors and Bottlers)

Retailer 1: Discount departmental stores such as Wal-Mart

Retailer 2: Grocery stores such as Kroger

Referent Power

·         Dealing with worldwide or international clients implies that Dr. Pepper comprehends the ideal operation of the channel

·         Dr. Pepper’s long history of manufacturing beverage drinks

Lack expert power apart from that exercised within their warehousing knowledge

 

 

 

 

 

 

·         Comprehension of their consumers as well as purchase data enable them to identify the appropriate time for restocking

·         Wal-Mart’s comprehension of the logistics process

 

Have better comprehension of the product, which enhance their ease of selling

Comprehend buyers and target market owing to greater personal interaction with consumers

 

Balance of Power

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

·         Owing to their personal or one-on-one interaction with consumers, these retailers always possess adequate comprehension of the tastes, preferences, and needs of customers. This knowledge can assist Dr. Pepper in manufacturing and promoting its products

Table V: Expert Power

 

Short-Term Fix Identification

Dr. Pepper’s major competitors such as Pepsi and Coca Cola are larger multinational firms and that explains their possession of highly extended distribution channels. Whereas these rivals operate in similar pattern to that of Dr. Pepper, which is characteristic of larger players in Canada’s beverage industry, Coca Cola and Pepsi possess international connections that enable them to excel when it comes to global distribution of products.  As aforementioned, beverage firms often sell their products to wholesalers (distributors and bottlers), who in turn sell products to retailers, who then sell to final buyers or end users (Leach, 2017). Nonetheless, when it comes to Pepsi and Coca Cola, this process is different in the sense that these companies employ their firm-owned distribution outlets. The two companies have intensified or strengthened their distribution channels by ensuring that they have a proliferation of distribution centers across the country. In some situations, Dr. Pepper is compelled to hire the services of these firms in order to deliver its products to end users in a timely manner. Therefore, it can be noted that Pepsi and Coca Cola have a competitive edge over Dr. Pepper in terms of highly extended distribution channels. This potential enables these companies to directly involve themselves in the delivery of products to customers.

Dr. Pepper should focus on embracing the approach employed by Pepsi and Coca Cola to ensure that it strengthens its distribution networks across the country. While such an undertaking will be viable, Dr. Pepper will be compelled to incur enormous costs in adapting its distribution chain to match those of its rivals. Focusing on the expansion or strengthening of the company’s distribution chains will be a high risk change considering that enormous upfront costs will be involved including construction of novel warehouses, purchases of extra trucks to supply products to be newly developed warehouses and recruiting workers, as well as the coordination of these activities. It is also significant to note that Dr. Pepper, Pepsi, and Coca Cola have a shortcoming in relation to ensuring that retailers to do not run out of stock when it comes to providing major brands from these companies during peak seasons such as festive seasons. Therefore, Dr. Pepper’s management should be informed of this shortcoming so that necessary measures are embraced to address it. Dent (2014) argues that adequate planning and effective cooperation with wholesalers and warehouses is significant in addressing issues associated with shortage of products or beverages in retail stores. Dent (2014) adds that beverage companies can also exploit opportunities provided by online sales platforms, as this can drive product sales in retail stores, thereby leading to constant stocking of shelves. Whereas Dr. Pepper may be focusing on the expansion of its distribution networks, the company’s management should remain cognizant of the potential environmental impacts that its supply chain can have on the environment. According to Jiang (2017), bigger supply chains are associated with more pronounced effects on the environment relative to smaller supply chains. 

The Ideal Channel

Currently, Dr. Pepper is almost close to the realization of the ideal channel for its operations. The company should focus majorly selling its products directly to consumers including retailers. This goal can be accomplished when the company comes between the wholesalers and retailers, who are part of Dr. Pepper’s customers. The firm’s management should commence by acquiring various distribution outlets across the country in order reinforce its product supply chains or outlets. In this manner, the company will solely focus on company-owned warehouses, which in turn will enhance direct interaction with customers, on-time delivery of products, and elimination of the issue of product shortage on the part of retailers during peak seasons. The ideal channel for Dr. Pepper is provided below:

 

 

Dr. Pepper’s management should also supplement the above channel by harnessing its trade website to establish sales for the company. Palanisamy and Liu (2018) assert that companies should focus on leveraging their Search Engine Optimization (SEO) with the aim of increasing the chances of customers finding products that they are looking for or searching on the firms’ websites. Moreover, social media campaigns should be created to grow the firm’s distribution reach. Full implementation of the proposed channel can be accomplished in the long-term, as it requires enormous financial resources. However, its complete implementation will result in massive gains to the firm, as aforementioned mentioned in this section.

downsides, hence facilitating an effective engagement process.

References

Calia, M. (2014a). Dr pepper snapple posts decline in sales, volume. Wall Street Journal (Online) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1497198876?accountid=4504

Calia, M. (2014b). Dr pepper snapple raises outlook; cost cuts, volume boost profit; company boosts its full-year earnings projection by five cents.Wall Street Journal (Online) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1547884908?accountid=45049

Cleverism. (2019). Business model of Dr Pepper Snapple Group. Retrieved April 13, 2019 from: https://www.cleverism.com/company/dr-pepper-snapple-group/

Dent, J. (2014). Technology Distribution Channels : Understanding and Managing Channels to Market. London: Kogan Page.

Discovery Research Group. (2014). Social Media Brand Analysis: Dr. Pepper. Retrieved April 13, 2019 from: https://thejuicepress.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/dr-pepper-case-study.pdf

Dr. Pepper Snapple Group (2017). Sustainability Report. Accessed April 13, 2019 from: https://www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com/smedia/pdfs/2017120710342017_CSR_Report_Final_v3_optimized.pdf

Dr Pepper Snapple Group. (2014). Dr Pepper Snapple Group Signs 3-Year Agreement with San Francisco Giants to Be Official Iced Tea Partner. Business Wire (English). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c56267398&site=ehost-live

Dr. Pepper Snapple Facility Under Way. (2008). Industry Week/IW, 257(12), 20. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=35447002&site=ehost-live

Jiang, Z. (2017). Procurement Management in the Supply Chain Environment : A Practical Guide to Understanding Procurement Management and Enhancing Procurement Effectiveness and Efficiency. Witney, Oxford, UK: Chartridge Books Oxford.

Leach, K. (2017). Dr Pepper Grows “Healthy” Beverages. Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker’s Journal, 52(1), 6–8. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?

Palanisamy, R., & Liu, Y. (2018). User Search Satisfaction in Search Engine Optimization: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Services Research, 18(2), 83–120.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix

Appendix A:

Communication Plan for an Inpatient Unit to Evaluate the Impact of Transformational Leadership Style Compared to Other Leader Styles such as Bureaucratic and Laissez-Faire Leadership in Nurse Engagement, Retention, and Team Member Satisfaction Over the Course of One Year

Related Samples

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?