- QUESTION
Week 3 A1: Discussion Question 1
Since the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, there have been many opportunities to look at quality and errors within health care. Health Grades is an organized system devoted to looking at some of this data.
Look at their most current report and review the content. Identify at least two major issues described in the report and discuss the implications to the APN.
Please use issues:
1. Complications and Deaths Increase Costs
2. Length of Stay Contributes to Direct Costs
The report is attached.
Also attached is AAPN Report for NP Cost effectiveness.
Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are a proven response to the evolving trend towards wellness and preventive health care driven by consumer demand. A solid body of evidence demonstrates that NPs have consistently proven to be cost-effective providers of high-quality care for almost 50 years. Examples of the NP cost-effectiveness research are described below. Over three decades ago, the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) (1981) conducted an extensive case analysis of NP practice, reporting that NPs provided equivalent or improved medical care at a lower total cost than physicians. NPs in a physician practice potentially decreased the cost of patient visits by as much as one third, particularly when seeing patients in an independent, rather than complementary, manner. A subsequent OTA analysis (1986) confirmed original findings regarding NP cost effectiveness. All later studies of NP care have found similar cost-efficiencies associated with NP practice. The cost-effectiveness of NPs begins with their academic preparation. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing has long reported that NP preparation cost 20-25% that of physicians. In 2009, the total tuition cost for NP preparation was less than one-year tuition for medical (MD or DO) preparation (AANP, 2010). Comparable savings are associated with NP compensation. In 1981, the hourly cost of an NP was one-third to one-half that of a physician (OTA). The difference in compensation has remained unchanged for 30 years. In 2010, when the median total compensation for primary care physicians ranged from $208,658 (family) to $219,500 (internal medicine) (American Medical Group Association, 2010), the mean full-time NP’s total salary was $97,345, across all types of practice (American Academy of Nurse Practitioners [AANP], 2010). A study of 26 capitated primary care practices with approximately two million visits by 206 providers determined that the practitioner labor costs and total labor costs per visit were both lower in practices where NPs and physician assistants (PAs) were used to a greater extent (Roblin, Howard, Becker, Adams, and Roberts, 2004). When productivity measures, salaries, and costs of education are considered, NPs are cost effective providers of health services. Based on a systematic review of 37 studies, Newhouse et al (2011) found consistent evidence that cost-related outcomes such as length of stay, emergency visits, and hospitalizations for NP care are equivalent to those of physicians. In 2012, modeling techniques were used to predict the potential for increased NP cost-effectiveness into the future, based on prior research and data. Using Texas as the model State, Perryman (2012) analyzed the potential economic impact that would be associated with greater use of NPs and other advanced practice nurses, projecting over $16 billion in immediate savings which would increase over time. NP cost-effectiveness is not dependent on actual practice setting and is demonstrated in primary care, acute care, and long term care settings. For instance, NPs practicing in Tennessee’s state-managed managed care organization (MCO) delivered health care at 23% below the average cost associated with other primary care providers, achieving a 21% reduction in hospital inpatient rates and 24% lower lab utilization rates compared to physicians (Spitzer, 1997). A one-year study comparing a family practice physician-managed practice with an NP-managed practice within an MCO found that compared to the physician practice, the NP-managed practice had 43% of the total emergency department visits, 38% of the inpatient days, and 50% total annualized per member monthly cost (Jenkins and Torrisi, 1995). Nurse managed centers (NMCs) with NP-provided care have demonstrated significant savings, less costly interventions, and fewer emergency visits and hospitalizations (Hunter, Ventura, and Keams, 1999; Coddington and Sands, 2009). A study conducted in a large HMO setting established that adding an NP to the practice could virtually double the typical panel of patients seen by a physician with a projected increase in revenue of $1.28 per member per month, or approximately $1.65 million per 100,000 enrollees annually (Burl, Bonner, and Rao, 1994). Chenowith, Martin, Pankowski, and Raymond (2005) analyzed the health care costs associated with an innovative on-site NP practice for over 4000 employees and their dependents, finding savings of $ .8 to 1.5 million, with a benefit-to-cost ratio of up to 15 to 1. Later, they tested two additional benefit-to-cost models using 2004-2006 data for patients receiving occupational health care from an NP demonstrating a benefit to cost ratio ranging from 2.0-8.7 to 1, depending on the method (Chenowith, Martin, Pankowski, and Raymond (2008). Time lost from work was lower for workers managed by NPs, compared to physicians, as another aspect of cost-savings (Sears, Wickizer, Franklin, Cheadie, and Berkowitz, 2007). A number of studies have documented the cost-effectiveness of NPs in managing the health of older adults. Hummel and Prizada (1994) found that compared to the cost of physician-only teams, the cost of a physician-NP team long term care facility were 42% lower for the intermediate and skilled care residents and 26% lower for those with long-term stays. The physician-NP teams also had significantly lower rates of emergency department transfers, shorter hospital lengths of stay, and fewer specialty visits. A one-year retrospective study of 1077 HMO enrollees residing in 45 long term care settings demonstrated a $72 monthly gain per resident, compared with a $197 monthly loss for residents seen by physicians alone (Burl, Bonner, Rao, and Kan, 1998). Intrator (2004) found that residents in nursing homes with NPs were less likely to develop ambulatory care-sensitive diagnoses requiring hospitalizations. Bakerjian (2008) summarized a review of 17 studies comparing nursing home residents who are patients of NPs to others, finding lower rates of hospitalization and overall costs for the NP patients. The potential for NPs to control costs associated with the healthcare of older adults was recognized by United Health (2009), which recommended that providing NPs to manage nursing home patients could result in $166 billion healthcare savings. NP-managed care within acute-care settings is also associated with lower costs. Chen, McNeese-Smith, Cowan, Upenieks, and Afifi (2009) found that NP-led care was associated with lower overall drug costs for inpatients. When Paez and Allen (2006) compared NP and physician management of hypercholesterolemia following revascularization, they found patients in the NP-managed group had lower drug costs, while being more likely to achieve their goals and comply with prescribed regimen. Collaborative NP/physician management was associated with decreased length of stay and costs and higher hospital profit, with similar readmission and mortality rates (Cowan et al., 2006; Ettner et al., 2006). The introduction of an NP model in a health system’s neuroscience area resulted in over $2.4 million savings the first year and a return on investment of 1600 percent; similar savings and outcomes were demonstrated as the NP model was expanded in the system (Larkin, 2003). Boling (2009) cites an intensive short-term transitional care NP program documented by Smigleski et al through which healthcare costs were decreased by 65% or more after enrollment, as well as the introduction of an NP model in a system’s cardiovascular area associated with a decrease in mortality from 3.7% to 0.6% and over 9% decreased cost per case (from $27,037 to $24,511). In addition to absolute cost, other factors are important to health care cost-effectiveness. These include illness prevention, health promotion, and outcomes. See Documentation of Quality of Nurse Practitioner Practice (AANP, 2013) for further discussion. References AANP (2010). Nurse practitioner MSN tuition analysis: A comparison with medical school tuition. Retrieved February 7, 2013 from http://www.aanp.org/images/documents/research/NPMSNTuitionAnalysis.pdf AANP (2010). 2009-2010 National NP sample survey: Compensation and benefits. Author: Austin TX. Accessed March 20, 2013 at http://www.aanp.org/images/documents/research/2009-10_income_Compensation.pdf American Association of Colleges of Nursing (nd). Nurse Practitioners: The Growing Solution in Health Care Delivery. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-sheets/nursepractitioners American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (2010). Documentation of Quality of Nurse Practitioner Care. Retrieved December 3, 2009 from http://www.aanp.org. American Medical Group Association (2009). 2009 Physician Compensation Survey. Retrieved September 22, 2009 from http://www.cehkasearch.com/compensation/amga. Bakerjian, D. (2008). Care of nursing home residents by advanced practice nurses: A review of the literature. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 1(3), 177-185. Boling, P. (2000). Care transitions and home health care. Clinical Geriatric Medicine, 25, 135-148. Burl, J., Bonner, A., Rao, M., & Khan, A. (1998). Geriatric nurse practitioners in long-term care: demonstration of effectiveness in managed care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46(4), 506-510. Chen, C., McNeese-Smith, D., Cowan, M., Upenieks, V., & Afifi, A. (2009). Evaluation of a nurse practitioner led care management model in reducing inpatient drug utilization and costs. Nursing Economics, 27(3), 160-168. Chenoweth, D., Martin, N., Pankowski, J., & Raymond, L.W. (2005). A benefit-cost analysis of a worksite nurse practitioner program: First impressions. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47(11), 1110-6. Chenoweth, D., Martin, N., Pankowski, J., & Raymond, L. (2008). Nurse practitioner services: Three-year impact on health care costs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 50(11), 1293-1298. Coddington, J. & Sands, L. (2008). Cost of health care and quality of care at nurse–managed clinics. Nursing Economics, 26(2) 75-94. Cowan, M.J., Shapiro, M., Hays, R.D., Afifi, A., Vazirani, S., Ward, C.R., et al. (2006). The effect of a multidisciplinary hospitalist physician and advanced practice nurse collaboration on hospital costs. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 36(2), 79-85. Ettner, S.L., Kotlerman,J., Abdemonem, A., Vazirani, S., Hays, R.D., Shapiro, M., et al. (2006). An alternative approach to reducing the costs of patient care? A controlled trial of the multi-disciplinary doctor-nurse practitioner (MDNP) model. Medical Decision Making, 26, 9-17. Hummel, J., & Pirzada, S. (1994). Estimating the cost of using non-physician providers in an HMO: where would the savings begin? HMO Practice, 8(4), 162-4. Hunter, J., Ventura, M., & Kearns, P. (1999). Cost analysis of a nursing center for the homeless. Nursing Economics, 17 (1), 20-28. Intrator, O., Zinn, J., & Mor, V. (2004) Nursing home characteristics and potentially preventable hospitalization of long-stay residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 1730-1736. Jenkins, M. & Torrisi, D. (1995). NPs, community nursing centers and contracting for managed care. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 7(3), 119-23. Larkin, H. (2003). The case for nurse practitioners. Hospitals and Health Networks, (2003, Aug.), 54-59. Newhouse, R. et al (2011). Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1999-2008: A systematic review. Nursing Economic$, 29 (5), 1-22. Office of Technology Assessment. (1981). The Cost and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Office of Technology Assessment. (1986). Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, and Certified Nurse Midwives: A Policy Analysis. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Paez, K. & Allen, J. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioner management of hypercholesterolemia following coronary revascularization, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 18(9), 436-444. Perryman Group (2012). The economic benefits of more fully utilizing advanced practice registered nurses in the provision of care in Texas. Author: Waco, TX. Accessed March 20, 2013 at http://www.texasnurses.org/associations/8080/files/PerrymanAPRN_UltilizationEconomicImpactReport.pdf. Roblin, OW., Howard, D.H., Becker E.R., Adams, E., & Roberts, M.H. (2004). Use of midlevel practitioners to achieve labor cost savings in the primary care practice of an MCO. Health Services Research, 39, 607-26. Sears, J., Wickizer, T., Franklin, G., Cheadie, A., & Berkowitz, B. (2007). Expanding the role of nurse practitioners: Effects on rural access to care for injured workers. Journal of Rural Health, 24(2), 171-178. Spitzer, R. (1997). The Vanderbilt experience. Nursing Management, 28(3), 38-40. United Health. Group (2009). Federal health care cost containment: How in practice can it be done? Options with a real world track record of success. Retrieved February 7, 2013 from http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/ hrm/UNH_WorkingPaper1.pdf.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width_tablet="" width_phone="100%" width_last_edited="on|phone" max_width="100%"]
| Subject | Nursing | Pages | 4 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
Week 3 A1: Discussion Question 1
Since the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, there have been many opportunities to look at quality and errors within health care. Health Grades is an organized system devoted to looking at some of this data. In their most current report American Hospital Quality Outcomes 2014, the authors study nationwide performance of over 4,500 hospitals involved in 31 common inpatient procedures and conditions from 2010 to 2012. Also the authors review findings from a study conducted earlier, on the “relationship between adverse patient outcomes and the resulting increase in direct costs incurred by hospitals.” (Roughton & Baro, 2013)
Roughton & Baro (2013) note that there is a significant disparity in hospital performance across various local service areas, and advice consumers to choose best performing hospitals in their specific area of complications. Moreover, the report points out several factors that contribute to high costs of health services. Firstly, statistics indicate that health complications and death have a significant impact on the risk-adjusted direct cost. Complications may increase this cost by 1.3 to 2.3 times, while mortality increases the risk-adjusted cost by 3.3 times (Roughton & Baro, 2013). Secondly, condition and procedure notwithstanding, patients’ length of stay has the most significant impact on risk-adjusted cost (Roughton & Baro, 2013).
From this report, it is clear that nurse practitioners have a role in ensuring that patients are provided with safe and quality care. Such care will help avert possible complications and mortalities that may arise in the course of healing, and raise the cost of treatment (American Association of Nurse Practitioners 2013). Secondly, nurse practitioners are tasked with being updated on the latest evidence based approaches and techniques to optimize quality care outcomes (Roughton & Baro, 2013). Also, nurse practitioners ought to discuss and exhaust viable interventions with their patients, to ensure that their patients know the impact of their choices on their length of stay in healthcare facilities, and consequently, the corresponding risk-adjusted costs.
In conclusion, delivery of safe and quality care in healthcare facilities is dependent on all the stakeholders involved. Consumers should look for correct information and make sound, cost-effective healthcare decisions. For the hospitals on the other hand, findings from American Association of Nurse Practitioners (2013) indicate that the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners is independent on actual practice setting. Hence, all hospitals nationwide should strive to recruit as many nurse practitioners as possible to reduce costs in healthcare.
References
|
American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2013). Nurse Practitioner Cost-Effectiveness (7th ed.). American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.aanp.org/aanpqa2/images/documents/publications/costeffectiveness.pdf. Roughton, S., & Baro, S. (2013). American Hospital Quality Outcomes 2014: Healthgrades Report to the Nation: Executive Summary. Denver: Healthgrades. Retrieved from http://www.rsfh.com/upload/docs/About%20Us/2013-american-hospital-quality-outcomes-2014-healthgrades-report-to-the-nation.pdf.
|