Using the information you learned in your reading this week, think about how you would define a mezzo level and a macro level in the type of economy that Rachel Botsman presents (I WILL REFERENCE THE TEXTBOOK). In 500 words addressing the questions and criteria below. (Follow APA guidelines as is appropriate when citing and referencing sources.)
For example, are there mezzo systems she has done away with due to the globalization of exchange? Does her system consider everything to be a micro system since we access it individually and don’t need to go through other systems to access the resources we need / want? How would you define this global exchange in terms of systems theory?
Include in your paper: An example of a micro system she addresses; An example of a mezzo system she addresses; An explanation of a macro system she addresses; How are these boundaries blurred in the current economy as she explains it?
LINK TO VIDEO-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQa3kUJPEko
Sample Solution
In Rachel Botsman's book What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption, she discusses the emergence of a new economy based on collaborative consumption. She argues that this new economy is comprised of sharing, bartering, and exchanging goods and services without relying upon traditional ownership or markets (Botsman, 2010). In this type of economy, people are able to access resources from other individuals or businesses without having to go through multiple systems or organizations.
At the micro level in this type of economy, individuals can find what they need directly from one another. For example, Airbnb allows people to rent out rooms in their homes to visitors who may not have access to hotels nearby. Similarly, RideShare companies such as Uber allow users to request rides directly from drivers within their area instead of having to rely on public transportation systems. These types of exchanges occur directly between two parties with no involvement from outside sources and often do not require any monetary payment for goods or services received (Botsman & Rogers, 2011)
How do you define a Civil War and what criteria do you have to fit to say that your country is at what? The most seen academic definition has that of two key criteria. ‘’The first says that the warring groups must be from the same country and fighting for control of the political centre, control over a separatist state or to force a major change in policy. The second says that at least 1,000 people must have been killed in total, with at least 100 from each side’’.
Civil wars evidently involve countless types of conflict. Conflict which actually only happens between residents of the same country, which is why the name of Civil War was given. Many analysts differentiate amongst civil wars in which rebels try to take over and rule the current government. Conflicts which started due to wanting to gain the full control of the leading government can sometimes involve rebels originating from inside the heart of the state apparatus, for example coups which are carried out by the military (Military coup) like that of the Turkish coup d’etat, which in fact was a mostly filed attempt on 15 July 2016. The coup in Turkey was against state institution, which included the government along with the Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The coup which was conducted by only a fraction of the Turkish military names themselves the Peace at Home Council. The aim was an attempt to seize the control of several recognised places in Turkey such as Ankara and the capital Istanbul. Even though they attempted to seize the control of these places they failed to take control other forces who were loyal to the country helped to defeat them.
These challenges don’t only stem from the inside of the political formation but also from the outside too. Experts differentiate amongst cultural wars in which the rebels and persons who are in control of the government have detached ethnic identities and innovative wars in which rebels attempt to achieve huge key social revolution. Colonial wars are occasionally singling down to a kind of distinct from civil conflicts on a state’s core ground. Nevertheless, with these variances a given civil war will frequently combine numerous factors. An example of these factors would be that the insurgencies might be equally culturally and ideologically built and the insurgents’ intentions can alternate over a period of time from secession for a limited territory area to then governing the entire state. Civil wars are normally not as severe as national battles. If you were to measure and create a death toll from the direct battles, the vast majority of logged deaths in battle since the cold war actually come from civil wars. Civil wars tend to be more recurrent and last a much longer time than what a national/world war would. Civil war can also have a considerable indirect influence on individual’s wellbeing outside of the actual loss of life statistics. Over the passing years it has been found by numerous different academic studies that the different countries who are competing in civil wars will in fact suffer hugely from a distinct downfall in gross domestic products and they won’t ever be able to recover to enable them to get to their previous economic growth level. conflict disrupts trade and investments badly and the trade in that state may even end up coming to a complete halt. this will then leave great social leg