Research Translation
As a DNP, you are preparing a research project on assessing the effectiveness of evidence-based practice implementation in management of alcohol and substance use disorder in healthcare organization. Address the following as it patterns to the project;
1.How do stakeholders describe and measure quality in this organization or functional
unit? who owns the data?
2.What quality improvement activities are underway in the organization or functional
unit?
3.What are the quality goals of the group [or organization]?
4.Has the group [organization] been successful in it quality improvement efforts?
5. Have there been failures in the work or quality improvement?
6. What are the baseline measures of quality before the project begins?
7. What is the level of quality below which performance must not fall?
8. How is benchmarking accomplished?
9. Who are the stakeholders?
Sample Solution
1. Quality in the organization or functional unit can be described and measured using metrics such as patient satisfaction rates, healthcare outcomes, adherence to best practices and safety standards, cost of care, timeliness of services provided, quality of information available to staff and patients, and patient experience with access to services. Stakeholders such as health administrators, clinicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals who are involved in providing care should own the data associated with any quality improvement activities that are undertaken within the organization or functional unit.
Following the trend of most democratic regimes around the globe, Brazil transitioned from an authoritarian governing system to a democratic system after rectifying the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. Currently, Brazil is considered to be a democratic republic with a bicameral legislative system of an upper house chamber and a lower house chamber, whose seats are filled based on federalist electoral rules. While these rules were created with the purpose of representative equality, the results have stirred controversy over Brazil’s electoral efficiency and effectiveness. Since Brazil’s democracy is fairly young, it is difficult to discern what the long-term effects of the electoral system will be. Some political scientists pose the question of what consequences an open-list proportional system would impose on the United States if they adopted a parallel election system. Yet, this hypothetical question means questioning one form of democracy over another, despite the fact that the term “democracy” has yet to obtain a firm definition, leads scholars to tip-toe around the subject. While one must walk on eggshells, it is a question worth asking and can provide interesting insights into future democratic possibilities.
As previously stated, Brazilian legislature is comprised of an upper chamber, the Senate, or Senado, and a lower Chamber of Deputies, or Câmara dos Deputados. Formally, the Senate contains 81 seats, where three senators are chosen from each of the 27 federal states to ensure equal representation. In the Chamber of Deputies, 513 seats are chosen based on the open-list proportional representation, or open-list PR, the electoral system instituted within Brazilian politics. As stated by J. Tyler Dickovick and Jonathan Eastwood in Comparative Politics, “this system allows each voter to select a specific candidate and then attempts to achieve proportionality by aggregating the votes across parties,” (Dickovick/Eastwood, 209). In Brazil and European nations, open-list PR features the opportunity for political parties to gain house support from the var