Robin Hood Case Study

Answer

Robin Hood Case Study

This paper discusses Robin Hood Case study by analyzing Robin's band's challenges and the best solution he needs to implement. Robin is facing a profit squeeze because the incomes are reducing while the costs are rising as the first problem. The Merry Band's revenue was in decline because the wealthy travelers were avoiding the Sherwood Forest route. The second problem was resource constraints. Sherwood Forest has limited resources because its inputs (travelers to rob) have reduced mostly since the wealthy travelers began avoiding it. Also, costs increase as the recruit’s number is starting to surpass the forest’s food volume. The price of food purchase is starting to deplete the band’s monetary reserves when the incomes declined.

The third problem is communication and leadership disorientation. Robin had before depended on informal communication to plan and execute processes. Robin is happy with the enlarging and his band’s impact. But progress has implied that specialized obligations have started occupying most of the men's time, establishing a command gap between Robin and the first-line recruits. Also, they are positioned in an enormous encampment that is noticeable for miles. Hence this develops a likelihood of a surprise raid on them. Therefore, Merry Men’s setting nature and operations needed secrecy and flexibility (David & David, 2016). The present physical facility does not offer this. Thus, Robin needs to redefine its mission and vision because it changed as the rebellion is now routinized into banditry (Noe et al., 2017). likewise, he must pinpoint the main stakeholders, enlarge his focus past his private grudge with the Sheriff to incorporate the region's needs or the country.

 The fourth problem was the rising strength of the Sheriff’s forces. The Sheriff and his robust networks are a threat to Robin because they were better organized and were harassing the Merry Men. Also, the Sheriff was using his political connection to get reinforcement which means that Robin's plans of killing the Sheriff were futile. Therefore, Robin is confronted with the decisions on whether to (i) whether to murder the Sheriff, (ii) whether to take the Baron's offer to collaborate in freeing King Richard, and (iii) if he should enforce the fixed transit tax. The decision of murdering the Sheriff is not viable because it would be no assurance that Prince John would not appoint another person’s even worse than the Sheriff. Also, murdering the Sheriff does not aid the group in getting King Richard discharged from jail. The idea of enforcing a fixed transit tax on the travelers and local townspeople, but the band resisted because the farmer and the townspeople were the band’s political capital in their fight against the Sheriff. The best solution was Robin collaborating with the Baron to restore King Richard to the throne because his future amnesty is guaranteed. But this mission is risky, and if it fails, the effects are severe and very dangerous. Also, King Richard or the Baron might decline to honor his promise.

The advantage of this solution is that King Richard will answer the poor’s problems, the Sheriff will be ousted from power; hence his threat to the Merry Men will be no more, and the band will not need to rob the wealthy. Robin should take various actions when pursuing this solution. Robin needs to meet the MerryMen and clarify the strategic dilemmas and band is confronting and the challenging options it has to make to chart a new course (Gallus & Frey, 2016). also, Robin should halt the acceptance of recruits and downsize the band. Robin should also pursue mediation with the Barons to get amnesty for the MerryMen, the validation being that their exertions helped generate cash that Robin contributed towards King Richard's ransom. Evade further fights with the Sheriff for the Sheriff to reduce the urgency of securing reinforcement as a means of buying time in securing King Richard’s release to be successful.