[et_pb_section fb_built="1" specialty="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_padding="0px|0px|0px|||"][et_pb_column type="3_4" specialty_columns="3" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="28px|||||"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" hover_enabled="0" sticky_enabled="0"]
QUESTION
Week 5 Law and Religion
Answer questions 4, 5, and 6 on page 64 in 3rd Ed.;
Questions are included on attachments.
source- JEFFREY A. BRAUCH, A HIGHER LAW: READINGS ON THE INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIAN THOUGHT ON ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW (Hein & Co. 3rd Edition 2019
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width_tablet="" width_phone="100%" width_last_edited="on|phone" max_width="100%"]
| Subject |
Law and governance |
Pages |
3 |
Style |
APA |
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner module_class="the_answer" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" hover_enabled="0" sticky_enabled="0"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width="100%" custom_margin="||||false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|0px|||false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|desktop"]
Answer
The Essence of Stare Decisis and its Biblical Inclination
What is Stare Decisis?
Stare Decisis comes from a Latin expression meaning "to stand by things that have been decided" or "let the decision stand." It refers to the precedent doctrine well developed in common law, driven by prior judicial decisions in court rulings (Brauch, 2008). It means if a court has ruled on a matter of law, lower courts in the same jurisdiction are obliged to obey the ruling in their decisions unless the higher court has ruled differently subsequently.
Why is Stare Decisis Important?
The concept of the precedent is profoundly philosophical. Without it, the English constitution would not have established itself (Schauer, 2019). The English constitution consists of the British constitutional foundations, set down in customs, precedents, judgments, and statutes, and there is a much more significant portion of common law in it than the statute law (Brauch, 2008). Makes law stable and predictable, judge try to follow past decisions. Precedent rules can make the law more flexible and adaptable
Because of the deference we are used to paying to the legal courts' rulings, the preservation of this doctrine is of great importance, particularly in situations where their logical correctness is open to debate (Brauch, 2008). This acknowledgment of the power and province of the judicial tribunals to give absolute obedience to the doctrines in the guidance and settlement of our civil institutions, even when the court's judgment lays a guiding and shaping hand, not formally, maybe, but in the requisite deductions from its conclusions, on the most vigorously debated political issues, or the most relevant government affairs
How do these passages support the doctrine of stare decisis?
The Bible passages are in full support of the doctrine. Two passages have pointed out the judges who act as the final decision (Brauch, 2008). It has been mentioned that their decision was to be used to set out a common law. All three passages have one thing in common; the common law is derived from integrity, just and equality.
.
References
Brauch, J. A. (2008). A Higher Law: Readings on the Influence of Christian Thought in Anglo-American Law. William S. Hein & Company, Incorporated.
Schauer, F. (2019). Stare Decisis—Rhetoric and Reality in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Review, 2018(1), 121-143.
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px|false|false" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|desktop" custom_padding="60px||6px|||"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_text _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" min_height="34px" custom_margin="||4px|1px||"]
Related Samples
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color="#E02B20" divider_weight="2px" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" width="10%" module_alignment="center" custom_margin="|||349px||"][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner use_custom_gutter="on" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|||-44px||" custom_margin_tablet="|||0px|false|false" custom_margin_phone="" custom_margin_last_edited="on|tablet" custom_padding="13px||16px|0px|false|false"][et_pb_column_inner saved_specialty_column_type="3_4" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default"][et_pb_blog fullwidth="off" post_type="project" posts_number="5" excerpt_length="26" show_more="on" show_pagination="off" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" header_font="|600|||||||" read_more_font="|600|||||||" read_more_text_color="#e02b20" width="100%" custom_padding="|||0px|false|false" border_radii="on|5px|5px|5px|5px" border_width_all="2px" box_shadow_style="preset1"][/et_pb_blog][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type="1_4" _builder_version="3.25" custom_padding="|||" custom_padding__hover="|||"][et_pb_sidebar orientation="right" area="sidebar-1" _builder_version="4.9.3" _module_preset="default" custom_margin="|-3px||||"][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section]