-
- QUESTION
Ulysses S. Citizen (U.S. Citizen or U.S.), a United States citizen and long-time resident of Norfolk, VA, works at the Norfolk shipyard as a civilian. He is fed up with the United States government and decides he wants to join Al Qaeda in the ongoing war against the United States. (Note: Congress recently passed another Authorization of the Use Of Military Force which authorized the President to “use all necessary and appropriate force against Al Qaeda.”)
Unsure of how to proceed, U.S. begins doing Google searches for, “Ways to Join Al Qaeda.” Through his google searches and personal connections, U.S. finds a phone number for Alkida Leader (Al), Al Qaeda’s third in command. U.S. calls Al, who is in Pakistan, and asks to join Al Qaeda and help wage war against the United States. Somewhat hesitant that U.S. might be a double agent, Al does not invite U.S. Citizen to train with Al Qaeda armed forces in Pakistan, which all new recruits who join Al Qaeda must do. Instead, Al instructs U.S. that he could serve Al Qaeda best by bombing Norfolk, blowing up ships and killing as many civilians as possible. Al explains to U.S. Citizen that Norfolk has been a top, strategic target for Al Qaeda since the war started, but Al Qaeda has not yet had the opportunity to attack it. Thus, Al told U.S. that if he was successful, Allah would be pleased and U.S. could become a full-fledged member of Al Qaeda, with no limitations. Over the next few weeks, to prepare him for the attack, U.S. and Al spoke every day on the phone. On the phone calls, Al instructed U.S. in the ways of Al Qaeda and its beliefs, which U.S. eagerly accepted.
Excited for his opportunity to serve Al Qaeda, U.S. constructs a bomb. U.S. then drives the bomb to the shipyard, uses his badge to enter, then places a brick on the gas pedal and sends the car and bomb into the shipyard. The bomb explodes as planned. One ship is damaged and 500 civilians are killed. (Note: targeting and killing civilians is a clear violation of the laws of war.)
Immediately, U.S. Citizen is arrested. While detaining U.S. Citizen, the government gets a warrant to search U.S.’s apartment. During the search, the government learns of U.S.’s Google searches and phone calls to Al. U.S. recorded his first conversation with Al so he could listen to it over and again to make sure he did exactly what Al Qaeda wanted. Accordingly, the President orders that U.S. be tried in a military commission at Guantanamo Bay under the Military Commissions Amendment Act. This Act, passed by Congress one year prior to U.S Citizen’s arrest, authorized the President to “try by military commission, in accordance with the laws of war, anyone who is (1) part of Al Qaeda and (2) violates the law of war while engaging in hostilities against the United States.” “Hostilities” is defined in the Act as “any conflict subject to the laws of war.” The Amendment also gave the President broad discretion and authority to set the rules of procedure governing the military commissions.
Question: Can U.S. Citizen be tried by the military commission under the Constitution and laws of the United States? Make arguments on both sides as to why or why not U.S. cannot be tried by the military commission. To answer this question, rely on the material studied in Unit 7, the statutes provided in the fact pattern, and other relevant cases or legal principles studied throughout the course. Explain Supreme Court cases in detail where helpful to your answer. Be sure to analyze all issues, regardless of your conclusion on preliminary issues. Simply argue in the alternative if necessary to ensure you cover all issues. Make sure your essay is organized with headings and is checked for grammar and spelling.
Subject | Law and governance | Pages | 3 | Style | APA |
---|
Answer
The Military Commissions at Guantanamo was first authorized through Military Commissions Act of 2006 to subject aliens who engages in unlawful enemy combatant, or who engages in war activities which expose civilians and their property to insecurity, danger, and loss. The Act was amended in 2009, in attempt to define the persons who are subject to the military commission[1]. This assignment argues whether, Ulysses S. Citizen (United State citizen) who became a terrorist can be tried by the military commission.
Upon the amendment, Sec. 948c under the title; Persons subject to military commissions read as follows, “Any alien unlawful enemy combatant is subject to trial by military commission under this chapter”. Under this provision, it is illegal to tri a US citizen by the Military Commissions regardless of the nature and magnitude of the offense[2]. Thus, by the authority of the federal law, the trial of Ulysses S. Citizen by military commission at Guantanamo Bay would be illegal. Nevertheless the Congress has the authority to lift this statutory prohibition. However, the constitutional law complicates the situation. There is never a clearly standing constitutional jurisprudence which out rightly and beyond any reasonable doubt, expressly prohibit the military commission from trying an American citizen.
It has been observed in the US that the Supreme court for instance has held both that the trial of a non-combatant U.S. citizen be the military commission is unconstitutional but only when civilian courts are still available and functional (in Ex parte Milligan) and that the trial of a U.S. citizen, who becomes unlawful enemy combatant by the military commission is constitutional (Ex parte Quirin)[3]. The legality or illegality of trial of a U.S citizen depends on whether there is or there is no civilian court. In the absence of a civilian court, it would be constitutionally fair to try Ulysses S. Citizen by the military commission. However, the question is whether there are functional civilian courts in the US or not.
The ultimate role of law is providing justice within the scope of the law. There is sufficient evidence that Ulysses S. Citizen committed war offence by colluding by terrorist to plan and execute a criminal act which lead to loss of 500 lives and damaged one ship. The government was able to acquire evidence through Google searchers and recorded phone conversation with AI Qaeda. It is therefore justifiable that Ulysses S. Citizen committed a war crime against the 500 people who died, to the owner of the ship which was damaged, and to the American government by killing its innocent citizens to please the enemy. Ulysses S. Citizen’s action, qualifies him to be an enemy belligerents within the provision of the Hague Convention and the law of war.P.37.12 [4]. It is therefore justifiable to try him by the military commissions. The Supreme Court is on record of upholding the legitimacy of military commission trying a citizen who is unlawfully an enemy combatant.
In conclusion, the ultimate goal of the law is justice through a legitimate means. The Military commission (Martial Court) has been fully recognized and mandated to try, investigate, pass judgment and sentence war offenders for decades. The Primary question would thus be whether a court would serve justice rather than to whom the justice will be served.
[1] Military Commissions Act of 2009
[2] Ibid pg. 2
[3] U.S. Supreme Court, Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 4 Wall. 2 2 (1866) Ex parte Milligan 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2
[4] Quita Jurecic (2016). The Legality of Donald Trump’s Proposal to Try US Citizens by Military Commission. LAWFARE, Friday, August 12, 2016, 11:25 AM. Accessed on June 24, 2020, from https://www.lawfareblog.com/legality-donald-trumps-proposal-try-us-citizens-military-commission
References
Appendix
|
|
Related Samples
The Role of Essay Writing Services in Online Education: A Comprehensive Analysis
Introduction The...
Write Like a Pro: Effective Strategies for Top-Notch Explication Essays
Introduction "A poem...
How to Conquer Your Exams: Effective Study Strategies for All Learners
Introduction Imagine...
Overcoming Writer’s Block: Strategies to Get Your Essays Flowing
Introduction The...
Optimizing Your Online Learning Experience: Tips and Tricks for Success
The world of education...