-
QUESTION
Title:
The Rational Public Policy Method
Paper Details
First, select a law enforcement agency of your choice. The organization can be your current employer, your school’s security department, or any other law enforcement agency that you are familiar withNext, follow the steps by fully completing Worksheet for Building Logic Models (Template 1). Then transpose the information onto Logic Model Template 2. In developing your logic model, you must follow the following steps in order:
- Determine the needs of the stakeholders.
- Develop the desired outcomes.
- Determine the available inputs.
- Determine the activities.
- Develop the outputs.
- Develop the goals.
| Subject | Law and governance | Pages | 12 | Style | APA |
|---|
Answer
The Rational Public Policy Method
Worksheet for Building Logic Models (Template 1)
The logic model is substantially used for evaluation of different programs in several countries across the globe. Expertise and an agent work together in developing the logic model for a joint community-investigator program. The logic model presents a sensible and plausible model which elucidates how the project will be undertaken under particular conditions. A broader array of stakeholders ought to be requested to come to the table to help team up the establishment of the logic model. Notably, the engagement of the stakeholders in the process would assist in promoting a sense of assurance, plan’s ownership as well as a shared vision among the parties.
|
Step 1: Identify ONE Problem (the Stakeholder Community Need) |
|
The community is facing a lot of insecurity, especially during the night as a result of attacks from unknown people. It is believed the attackers may be youths lacking investment opportunities and, therefore, the community and the investigating agency is in search of a systematic tactic or approach of identifying essential issues and needs of the youth and people involved in the attacks respectively. The involvement of the community is crucial in developing a sense of responsibility and ownership among the young persons. In the same token, the young population cannot venture into productive activities which can help them raise funds for economic growth as well as better standards of living. The stakeholder community identifies lack of youth empowerment as a big problem affecting the young people and making them engage in evil activities. The investigators, therefore, have a role in ensuring that the law is applied equally to make sure that everybody lives safely and happily.
|
|
Step 2: Determine the Outcomes |
|
Short Term: Some of the short-term outcomes take in a whole picture of the attitudes, behaviors of the surveyed youths and the risk, assets as well as some of the protective factors the youths face at many ecological levels. Notably, this particular information positions different agencies to respond to the problem. The youths have high risks of not securing jobs promptly, therefore, making them engage in evil activities. Long Term: A sustained support of the project to look in cohorts becomes one of the long-term outcomes of the problem (Williamson et al., 2016). Constant commitment, time, attention as well as financial resources to eventually accomplish the intended long-term outcomes of positive health, educational, economic, and social outcomes for the young population in the community are fundamental. Another long-term outcome may include continued membership and commitment in the investigating committee. The investigating agency needs to have an active obligation to ensure that the intended purpose of the program is achieved. |
|
Step 3: Identify the Inputs (available resources) |
|
Some of the inputs available for the project include funding, skill, expertise, and time. The partnership freed twenty-five percent of its time to devote to the project, meaning the members moved other duties to prioritize and concentrate on the project to ensure its success. Subsequently, the expertise scheduled numerous visits in the community, meeting the community committee and working with them to expedite the process (Besharov & Call, 2016). A lot of funding was put in place to educate the youths on how to secure jobs and become entrepreneurs. In addition, the steering board spent a lot of time discussing with the youth what may lead to unemployment and misconduct in the society. Many youths were interviewed to obtain whether they were the cause of insecurity or not. |
|
Step 4: Determine the Activities (the things that need to be done to accomplish the outcomes) |
|
The project is driven by an array of activities including interviewing the community members. Regular meeting of the different committees, and involving and informing stakeholders throughout the entire process constituted an essential part of the investigation. Social service providers, parents, youths, the religious community, and law enforcement officers were all significant influencers or players in the process (Kroeger Borders & Webster, 2013). Other activities also involved the development of sealant programs as well as fluoridation. |
|
Step 5: Determine the Output measurements (these are the measures of the activities) |
|
The activities can be measured through workforce outcome measurement model. It is vital to have a better understanding and conduct a measurement of both the desired outcome as well as the current position to track effectiveness and progress of the intervention. In addition, output measurement would involve identifying issues that may relate to either future or present anticipated requirement of the people as well as services. |
|
Step 6: Goal Statement (this is basically a re-wording of Step 1) |
|
To provide the youths with sources of employment to shun idling among them. The project is targeted at making sure that all the youths are able to secure jobs. Notably, the project had a target of knowing the source of insecurity in the area. |
Logic Model Template 2
|
Name of Organization: |
Federal Bureau Investigation Agency |
PROGRAM LOGIC MODEL
|
Program Goal: To investigate the needs of the youth
|
||||
|
Inputs |
Activities |
Outputs |
Outcomes |
|
|
Short Term |
Long Term |
|||
|
· Stakeholder Community is searching for an orderly approach of identifying fundamental needs and issues impacting the youths of the society. · Community engagement is important for the development of a sense of responsibility and ownership for young persons. · The community is concerned about the general quality of life for the young population. · The investigators would like to approve whether unemployed youth is the major cause of insecurity within the community. In conclusion, this logic model offers a visual exemplification of the community-investigator partnership program in finding out the cause of little insecurity within the community and applying the law towards the same. The assessment was to find out possible solutions towards youth unemployment since several people believed that the unemployed youth were the source of insecurity in the area. The logic model usage provides a language and structure for the evaluation to take place efficiently. The inputs, outputs, activities, and outcomes provide a platform for obtaining a sufficient report from the investigation. The investigating agency had to consider various factors before commencing the survey, for instance, economic and social factors.
|
Kroeger, S., Borders, C., & Webster, K. (2013). Research Strand: Program Evaluation.
Besharov, D. J., & Call, D. M. (2016). Using logic models to strengthen performance measurement. Improving public services: International experiences in using evaluation tools to measure program performance.
Williamson, H. J., Young, B. R., Murray, N., Burton, D. L., Levin, B. L., Massey, O. T., & Baldwin, J. A. (2016). Community–University Partnerships for Research and Practice: Application of an Interactive and Contextual Model of Collaboration. Journal of higher education outreach and engagement, 20(2), 55.
|
The data were gathered through interviews, questionnaires, and meetings.
|
Identifying youth attitude, behaviors, and perceptions about family, self, peers, and community. Celebrating and recognizing the positive aspects or facets of the youths. Educating community on youth-identified issues
Sustained or continual commitment of members of the community. |
Acquiring resources to address as well as identify issues via grants. Support from Country Board of Supervisors to identify and address issues affecting the youths. Improved, environmental economic, social, outcomes for community youths. |
References
|
Besharov, D. J., & Call, D. M. (2016). Using logic models to strengthen performance measurement. Improving public services: International experiences in using evaluation tools to measure program performance. Kroeger, S., Borders, C., & Webster, K. (2013). Research Strand: Program Evaluation. Williamson, H. J., Young, B. R., Murray, N., Burton, D. L., Levin, B. L., Massey, O. T., & Baldwin, J. A. (2016). Community–University Partnerships for Research and Practice: Application of an Interactive and Contextual Model of Collaboration. Journal of higher education outreach and engagement, 20(2), 55.
|