Answer

The Role of Moral Ethics in Decision Making

      Moral principles are crucial elements of decision making. It determines how individuals conduct and manage their daily lives and aids in making critical choices. Consequently, there are various theoretical approaches that aids in moral and ethical decision making. Therefore, this essay discusses the role of the moral, ethical theories – Utilitarianism, Kantian, and Aristotelian Virtue ethics – in assisting decision making. Subsequently, it helps – using the theories – in choosing between candidates who are corrupt and poor decision-makers and are likely to win an election; vis a vise a corrupt-free and good decision-maker who has the interest of the nation and is expected to lose. 

      Utilitarianism

      Utilitarianism theory – which is also a form of consequentialism – is a typical utility approach in decision making. It dictates that the right decision can only be determined whether it right or wrong by evaluating its outcomes (Driver, 2009). Therefore, according to the theory, the dedicated citizens might not vote for the ideal candidate since they depend on the outcome of the election to determine their choice. Hence they. Furthermore, the dedicated citizens might never decide to vote for the ideal candidate to ballot out the worse candidate since they make their decision by the outcomes of the elections. Moreover, they are hence unjustified a boycott of voting. 

      Kantian or Deontological Ethical 

      Based on the deontological theoretical approach, the dedicated citizens might vote for the corrupt-free candidate. The theory dictates that despite the outcomes, some actions are always wrong while others are right (Shakil, 2013). Therefore, the dedicated citizen might opt for the ideal candidate who has the nation’s interest despite the election’s outcome. Additionally, the citizens can neither vote for the least bad major candidate nor the worst main candidate. Through a well-thought decision process, they can only vote for the ideal candidate without considering the outcomes of the elections. Therefore, they have absolutely no reason to vote for any other candidate besides the excellent one. Moreover, they are even more justified not to vote if their evaluation results in a loss for the ideal candidate. 

      Aristotelian Virtue Ethics 

      Aristotelian virtue ethics approach dictates that the dedicated citizens vote the perfect candidate based on the virtues possessed. The theory is built on the fact that individuals are supposed to learn the core virtues. Therefore, a decision made on virtue enables the dedicated citizens to vote for the ideal candidate. Additionally, they would never vote for the bad or the worse candidate – major – if there is a perfect condition that possesses the virtues of being a leader. Consequently, this approach leaves no room for a tainted choice in terms of virtues. Therefore, they are justified to stick to their principle of choosing a leader with merit.

      In conclusion, moral principles are crucial attributes in decision making by people. More importantly, leaders are required to have these principles. As dedicated citizens, it is always their mandate to make a wise decision for the country. Therefore, they are required to evaluate and scrutinize the candidates as they project the future of the country rather than the outcome of the election. Consequently, I would vote in the ideal candidate who is corrupt-free, can make the right decision under pressure or predicaments, and the one with the ability to advance the interest of the nation.

.