The rules of attraction change for women as a function of their economic independence.
Post whether or not the rules of attraction change for women as a function of their economic independence. Explain whether or not the rules of attraction are biological imperatives or cultural constructions, or both. Please use social psychology theory to refute claims based on evolutionary theory.
Gender Differences in Mate Selection
The “law of attraction,” in whatever motives they may insight, does govern the process of choosing mates. From an evolutionary viewpoint, it is natural for humans to select mating partners based on psychological sex differences. Selecting individuals that are physically attractive to us is a fundamental aspect; regardless, with societal constrictions, our adaptations and assimilation of these restrictions influence our decisions when choosing a mate. This essay will discuss the power of rules of attraction on the change for women as a function of their economic independence. The paper findings suggest that laws of attraction are more culturally constricted than evolutionary-based in today’s society. Regardless individuals try to balance the two, whereby our decisions to choose mates are shaped by the force of physical appearance versus social and economic status.
Social responsibilities in the forms of cultural acceptance and social status have come a long way in influencing how individuals make crucial life decisions, including selecting mates. The social role theory claims that we choose mates based on their roles in society(Aronson et al., 2019). Hence, any shift in gender roles influences a change in our choices of mates; for instance, if women become independent, the evolutionary narrative changes automatically. Man’s status and wealth will matter less, while his physical appearance and beauty will become a key consideration. As Darley and Latané (1968) suggested in their article, the presence and acceptance of social responsibility have little to do with a prediction about an individual’s decisions to intervene due to their personality. Latane and Darley(1968) further introduce the diffusion explanation that suggests social influences on individuals does not predict their decision to feel responsible for helping others. Thus, Choosing mates becomes a battle of personality and social constriction.
Therefore, in today’s evolving society, societal influences are a significant influencer when choosing mates, while evolutionary considerations depend on what social role gender plays. This means in a society where women are economically independent, men’s physical appearance out-rules their social status as a factor to consider when choosing mates.
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M., & Sommers, S. R. (Eds.). (2019). Social psychology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. http://dx.doi.org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/h0025589
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. http://dx.doi.org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/h0026570