{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review the Walmart Case StudyLinks to an external site..

· Compare and contrast the differences in the Walmart financial statements if the company were to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) rather than Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Be sure to discuss specific accounting differences between the two.

· Debate the pros and cons this would create for Walmart. Be sure to be specific and support any opinions.

· Describe any legal or ethical challenges this convergence may create using the country you selected in prior courses.

 

Sample Solution

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are accounting principles that have been established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). These standards provide a common set of rules and guidelines to be followed when preparing financial statements. In contrast, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The IFRS focus on reporting the economic substance of transactions in a manner that is transparent and relevant to users of financial information.

The primary differences between GAAP and IFRS involve revenue recognition, inventory value, asset impairment, leases, foreign currency exchange rates, pensions and income taxes. Under GAAP regulations, revenue is recognized once it has been earned; under IFRS regulations, revenue can be recognized when it is realized or when it becomes probable that future economic benefits will arise from a transaction. With respect to inventory value, GAAP requires the use of either last-in-first-out or first-in first-out methods for determining closing costs whereas IFRS allows for various other cost formulas.

 

Sample Solution

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are accounting principles that have been established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). These standards provide a common set of rules and guidelines to be followed when preparing financial statements. In contrast, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are developed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The IFRS focus on reporting the economic substance of transactions in a manner that is transparent and relevant to users of financial information.

The primary differences between GAAP and IFRS involve revenue recognition, inventory value, asset impairment, leases, foreign currency exchange rates, pensions and income taxes. Under GAAP regulations, revenue is recognized once it has been earned; under IFRS regulations, revenue can be recognized when it is realized or when it becomes probable that future economic benefits will arise from a transaction. With respect to inventory value, GAAP requires the use of either last-in-first-out or first-in first-out methods for determining closing costs whereas IFRS allows for various other cost formulas.

 

rate such as 3%, due to the long lifespan of a nuclear plant and the fact that many can be extended. Operating costs include fuel costs, which are extremely low for nuclear, costing only 0.0049 USD per kWh, and non-fuel operation and maintenance costs which are barely higher at 0.0137 USD per kWh. This includes waste disposal, a frequently cited political issue that has no longer been relevant technically for decades as waste can be reused relatively well and stored on site safely at very low costs simply because the quantity of fuel used and therefore waste produced is so small. The fuel, uranium is abundant and technology enabling uranium to be extracted from sea water would give access to a 60,000 year supply at present rates of consumption so costs from ‘resource depletion’ are also small. Finally, external costs represent a very small proportion of running costs: the highest estimates for health costs and potential accident are at 5€/MWh and 4€/MWh respectively, though some estimates fall to only 0.3€/MWh for potential accidents when past records are adjusted to try and factor in improvements in safety standards; though these vary significantly due to the fact that the total number of reactors is very small.

 

 

Nuclear power therefore remains still one of the cheapest ways to produce electricity in the right circumstances and many LCOE (Levelised Cost of Energy) estimates, which are designed to factor in all costs over the life time of a unit to give a more accurate representation of the costs of different types of energy, though they usually omit system costs, point to nuclear as a cheaper energy source than almost all renewables and most fossil fuels at low discount rates.

LCOE costs taken from ‘Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2015 Edition’ and system costs taken from ‘Nuclear Energy and Renewables (NEA, 2012)’ have been combined by the World Nuclear association to give LCOE for four countries to compare the costs of nuclear to other energy sources. A discount rate of 7% is used, the study applies a $30/t CO2 price on fossil fuel use and uses 2013 US$ values and exchange rates. It is important to bear in mind that LCOE estimates vary widely as many assume different circumstances and they are very difficult to calculate, but it is clear from the graph that nuclear power is more than still viable; being the cheapest source in three of the four countries and third cheapest in the f

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?