1500 words essay Drawing on material from two out of the three strands of DD102 study materials, discuss some of the ways in which differences and inequalities persist over time. ——————————————————————– Specifically in this TMA, you were required to flex your comparing and contrasting analytical skills. You chose the second option that explored the problem of inequality and what to do about it as proposed by Hayek and Stiglitz. Your answer was good, well written and showed a decent understanding of both thinkers approaches to inequalities and the role of the state. The plan you submitted was good. It had a good level of detail and was coherently ordered and there appeared a balance to the discussion. I do wonder whether some indication of sources to support the relevant sections would have improved it. Follow the PEEL principles: Point, Explain, Expand, Link (back to question). That aside, I imagine this plan was much help when it came to writing the essay. Structurally, the essay had an introduction which set the context for the essay well but actually needed to also tell the reader what was to come in terms of (briefly) similarities and differences that would be explored. Similarly, your conclusion needed to be stronger on summarising the key points and arguments you have made. In terms of the main body, you showed an impressive understanding and ability to summarise both thinker’s ideas. There was scope for improvement though as I noted on the essay itself. Stiglitz needed more context and also what he foresaw the consequences of inequalities to be. With Hayek, you forget to actually detail properly what his views on inequality were and what should be done about it. These things need to be teased out earlier in the planning stage, ensuring you’re not missing anything out. The similarities and differences you explored were generally good and you noted the most significant ones. However, the clarity of the discussion of this part of the essay was found wanting in places. Also, the actual accuracy of some of the claims you made, in particular on Hayek’s views, I was not always convinced of. Worryingly some of these claims went unreferenced and there was no source to substantiate your claim. Do take a look at my comments. Towards the end of the essay you were making some points that read as more general reflections on the state of contemporary capitalism and the role of the state/government. It was unclear whether there were meant to be assigned to a Hayek or Stiglitz or quite what the point of the discussion was here. Again, something to be aware of and ensure in the further that is clear what the relevancy is of the points you are making. In terms of writing and expression, this was really strong – the essay had a really good tone to it. You made good use of the audio materials for your answer perhaps to the detriment of the relevant book chapters? While it was clear that you drew extensively on the course materials, there were many places in the essay that lacked references. This is something I have noted previously so please do attend to this in the EMA. A minimum of two references in each paragraph is a good rule of thumb. All claims need to be substantiated with evidence and references. Reference list at the end was fine. In terms of part 3 – personal reflection – this was better. You clearly identified areas for attention in the final assignment. What was pleasing to see was that many of them had begun to be worked on in this current assignment itself. This bodes well for the final assignment. So, well done again and for almost finishing the course – really great to see you make progress across the course. This was good assignment albeit one with room for further improvement! Do have a good think about this feedback and reflect carefully on what I have highlighted before starting the EMA. Do let me know if you’d like to discuss anything further regards this feedback or anything else in preparation for the EMA.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>