{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Post a brief explanation of three important components of the psychiatric interview and why you consider these elements important. Explain the psychometric properties of the rating scale you were assigned(NICH Vanderbilt Assessment Scale). Explain when it is appropriate to use this rating scale with clients during the psychiatric interview and how the scale is helpful to a nurse practitioner’s psychiatric assessment. Support your approach with evidence-based literature, and a minimum od three references.

Sample Solution

The psychiatric interview is an important part of a nurse practitioner’s assessment process, and there are three major components that must be considered: obtaining the patient’s history, assessing mental status, and conducting a risk/safety assessment. Obtaining the patient’s history includes gathering information about the presenting complaint as well as any pertinent past medical and psychiatric histories. This helps to establish a baseline for making comparisons or tracking progress over time (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013). Mental status assessment involves observing how the patient presents in terms of their physical appearance, behavior, cognitive functioning, affective state, insight/judgment and communication (APA, 2013). Finally, it is critical to assess for potential risks to self or others during the interview process; this includes asking questions related to suicide ideation or intent as well as violence towards others (APA, 2013).

 

Sample Solution

The psychiatric interview is an important part of a nurse practitioner’s assessment process, and there are three major components that must be considered: obtaining the patient’s history, assessing mental status, and conducting a risk/safety assessment. Obtaining the patient’s history includes gathering information about the presenting complaint as well as any pertinent past medical and psychiatric histories. This helps to establish a baseline for making comparisons or tracking progress over time (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013). Mental status assessment involves observing how the patient presents in terms of their physical appearance, behavior, cognitive functioning, affective state, insight/judgment and communication (APA, 2013). Finally, it is critical to assess for potential risks to self or others during the interview process; this includes asking questions related to suicide ideation or intent as well as violence towards others (APA, 2013).

 

On the other side of the aisle, there are a handful of disadvantages associated with the relationship of open-list PR. In traditional PR, party leaders would have the power to allocate seats to their parties candidates as they deem appropriate, taking away political influence from citizens. Candidates in both systems have incentives to garner political party support as it allocates more party power within the upper and lower chambers of the legislature. However, since candidates have more personal power in making a name for themselves without necessarily following party principles, this can lead to a weakening of political parties. Lack of faith in political parties leads to what is known as floor crossing, political figures would change party affiliation, “in an attempt to jockey for the best positions for future elections,” (Dickovick/Eastwood, 409). Only causing faith in open-list PR to further disintegrate, political leaders would offer bribes to legislators to maintain a majority vote on specific pieces of legislation. Also, due to legislators loyalty to their federal states, they do not always have Brazil’s interests in mind when enacting legislation, as only the members of their respective state ensure re-election. What’s more, Brazil contains a multi-party, fragmented party, system where “voters may face as many as one thousand candidates in a single district… [caused by] high-magnitude legislative districts, low costs for candidates’ entry, and high thresholds for the number of candidates per party list,” (Aguilar/Barone/Cunow/Desposato, 181). Withal, the disadvantages of open-list PR in Brazil have led citizens to lose trust in their government, such as the impeachment of Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff in August 2016.

Altogether, the interesting question arises of how an open-list PR system would affect a less fragmented, strong party alliance system in a democracy such as the United States. The transition from a strict first-past-the-post system, which has been the building blocks for American society for 250 years, would certainly cause an uproar from conservatives and libertarians alike. While it would have little to no effect on the Senate retaining two seats per state, the institution of voting proportionment would likely result in smaller parties becoming more prevalent in the House of Representatives. Potential effects of such an institutional

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?